- Journalists Distill News on Ebola, Licensing Midwives, and California’s Budget
- Justice Department charges 15 for $90M+ in alleged healthcare fraud, expands strike force
- UnitedHealth’s PBM names CFO
- Tennessee becomes 2nd state to ban PBMs from owning pharmacies
- Trump Bought Stock in Eli Lilly as His Policies Gave the Drugmaker a Big Boost, Documents Show
- 40% lower physician distress, 245% more violence reporting: Workforce retention strategies gaining traction
- 15 new behavioral health study findings to know
- APRN charged in $1.35M Medicare fraud scheme
- Florida woman faces charges of practicing unlicensed dentistry
- GI of the Rockies launches AI-powered care program
- Deputy injured in Indiana hospital shooting
- Legacy Health-backed insurer PacificSource to exit ACA market, pull out of Montana entirely
- Expanded federal scrutiny reshapes how hospitals govern risk, compliance
- The instability compounding the anesthesiologist shortage
- ADA proposes standards on dental cartridges, water quality
- The unraveling of prior authorization: 5 things to know
- The hospital bad debt and charity care crisis: 20 things to know
- As AI identifies more at-risk patients, health systems face a capacity challenge
- 5 GI power players
- 4 dental insurance updates to know
- Federal appeals court overturns EPA fluoride ruling: 5 notes
- What payers don’t understand about ASC spine surgery
- 3 men sentenced for $6.9M orthotic DME fraud scheme
- What will outpatient cardiology look like in 10 years?
- 15 leadership moves across 4 specialties
- Dental Medicaid disenrollment could cause $86M in added costs
- Park Dental opens Minnesota practice
- AI is about to break healthcare’s scarcity model — if we let it
- The most underrated threat in digital health
- Tennessee orthodontic practice opens 2 locations
- Justice Department charges autism care providers in $46.6M fraud case
- 14.2% of Medicaid patients received mental health ED follow-up: 4 notes
- Acting NIAID Chief Steps Down Amid Ebola, Hantavirus Concerns
- Leaders sound off on overrated ASC trends
- Dental hygienist employment reaches 222,000: State-by-state breakdown
- Vitana Pediatric & Orthodontic Partners adds 1st Maryland practice
- 10 highest-paying states for dental hygienists in 2026
- US overdose deaths decline for 3rd straight year: What it means for healthcare
- Sunscreen Confusion Puts More Americans At Risk For Melanoma
- ACAP warns final ACA rule adds further uncertainty to a market in flux
- AbbVie plots 85 summer layoffs tied to Allergan unit in California
- Quorum Health transitioning to nonprofit for financial pickup
- Women's Health Capitol Hill Day: Advocates lobby to advance budget priorities
- Europe's CHMP gives thumbs up to AZ's breast cancer drug after thumbs down from FDA adcomm
- Novartis, AbbVie plan summer layoffs on opposite coasts
- AstraZeneca, Daiichi beat Gilead to first-line TNBC with FDA nod for Datroway
- Industry Voices—From claims to compassion: Reclaiming patient advocacy in revenue cycle
- 1 In 10 U.S. Surgeons Quit Practice, Study Warns Of Shortage
- Video Game Can Detect Depression In Minutes, Study Says
- Quitting Smoking Might Lower Your Dementia Risk
- Severe Asthma Often Comes With Other Serious Health Problems
- AbbVie, GSK race up patient reputation leaderboard in the UK
- Efforts To Understand The Nation's Drugged Driving Problem Stall Under Trump
- Trump’s $50B Rural Health Bet Meets a Healthcare Desert in North Carolina
- 3 Medical Routines That Older People May Not Need
- Fierce Pharma Asia—Merck-Kelun ADC’s triple wins; Tools in China licensing deals; Takeda’s $885M antitrust loss
- Tyra creates awareness day with patient advocates to shine light on a rare cancer
- Machine learning-guided lifestyle plans reduce depression symptoms: 3 study notes
- Innovaccer picks up CaduceusHealth to offer end-to-end revenue cycle management
- Acadia psychiatric hospital faces abuse lawsuits
- Massachusetts behavioral health clinics to pay $1.4M to settle fraud allegations
- From 50 days to 7: How 1 system cut behavioral health intake wait times
- Hospitals allege contracted CVS Health subsidiaries pocketed their 340B savings
- Northwell hospital launches in-home behavioral health services
- RFK Jr. Fires Two Leaders Of Major U.S. Health Task Force
- Ksana Health awarded $17.9M to build behavioral health foundation model
- Lilly accuses church-linked pharmacies, wholesalers and more of running $200M+ rebate fraud scheme
- Study: Brokers increasingly recommending ICHRA to employers
- ASCO: Merck, Kelun's sac-TMT ADC combo beats Keytruda by 65% on progression in first-line lung cancer
- Common Food Preservatives Linked to Major Heart Problems
- Health Tech Weekly Rundown: Prime Healthcare expands virtual sitting tech; CVS Health studies seniors' digital health needs
- Amgen's Tavneos, facing liver injury scrutiny, gets label update in Japan as patient starts resume
- Gilead pledges 400K AmBisome doses to fight visceral leishmaniasis in expanded WHO collab
- With Voxzogo under pressure, BioMarin touts trial win in label expansion bid
- Migraine With Aura Linked To Middle-Age Stroke Risk
- Nicotine Vapes Triple Smokers' Odds Of Quitting Tobacco
- Fatty Liver Disease Increases Heart Attack Risk, Study Says
- Religious Anti-Abortion Center Finds Opportunity In Town Without OB-GYNs
- CPAP Insurance Rules Too Stringent, Deny Device Coverage To Sleep Apnea Patients Who Would Benefit
- ICE Arrests Are Separating Families. Here’s How To Plan Ahead.
- Colorado Charts Its Own Course on Vaccines Amid Federal Pullback
- OpenEvidence launches hands-free voice AI feature, expands hospital footprint with Cedars-Sinai tie-up
- Inside agency view: Ogilvy Health on AI’s ‘light speed,’ nano influencers and the rise of Ria
- Fixing Eligibility at the Point of Care: The Missing Link in Medical Device Reimbursement Integrity
- Fixing Eligibility at the Point of Care: The Missing Link in Medical Device Reimbursement Integrity
- The failure of the ‘usual suspects’ approach to life science recruitment
- The failure of the ‘usual suspects’ approach to life science recruitment
- Kennedy dismisses leaders of US Preventive Services Task Force
- Statement on Novel Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
- CMS proposes rule aimed at limiting Medicaid state-directed payments
- WTW: Employers aiming to bulk up AI use for health and benefits
- Freestanding EDs, urgent care acquisition opportunities abound for HCA Healthcare
- Value, Focus, and the Future of MedTech: M&A and Divestitures are Rewriting the Strategic Playbook.
- Value, Focus, and the Future of MedTech: M&A and Divestitures are Rewriting the Strategic Playbook.
- Rollback of PFAS Drinking Water Standards Raises Safety Fears
- 'Missed risk': Women's Heart Health Summit explores gaps in research, treatment
- House and Senate Democrats move to overturn CMS’ WISeR AI prior auth pilot
- Designing an agentic, future‑ready tech roadmap for emerging pharma
- Judi Health taps Clear for its identity verification tech
- Canvas Medical unveils Canvas Studio, a customizable EMR workflow tool for clinicians
- The Boston Children’s Experience: Hidden ICU Risk and AI-Driven De-escalation
- The Boston Children’s Experience: Hidden ICU Risk and AI-Driven De-escalation
- Artivion Completes Endospan Acquisition, Expands Aortic Arch Portfolio With FDA-Approved NEXUS System
- Artivion Completes Endospan Acquisition, Expands Aortic Arch Portfolio With FDA-Approved NEXUS System
- Your Handwriting Could Be a Window Into Your Aging Brain
- Democratic senators share plans for Medicare home care benefit, long-term care reform
- GHO Capital, CBC Group plan to merge, forming $21B healthcare investment firm
- Ipsen details growing pains as teens transition to adult care
- Lilly, AbbVie, J&J, AZ lead an uptick in Big Pharma Q1 growth, with Novo again bringing up the rear
- MetroHealth partners with Artisight on smart hospital platform rollout
- How Do Caffeine, Alcohol, Weed, Nicotine Affect MS Symptoms?
- Once-A-Day Pill Effective In Treating Sleep Apnea Without CPAP, Clinical Trial Says
- Teens Turning To Creatine, Not Steroids, For 'Looksmaxxing'
- BMS taps Anthropic’s Claude for enterprise-wide AI adoption to speed R&D, global workflows
- Gilead inks another deal with Korean API manufacturer Yuhan, this time worth $140M
- Childhood Trauma Tied to Higher Obesity Risk, But One Caring Adult Can Make A Difference
- Eroding ACA Enrollment Portends Higher Insurance Rates
- Amgen, bidding adieu to CFO, lures Galderma exec with hefty $12.4M bonus
- Watch: The Tug-of-War Over Taxpayer Dollars
- Religious Anti-Abortion Center Finds Opportunity in Town Without OB-GYNs
- CG Life appoints Collette Douaihy as chief creative officer as C-suite buildout continues
- Tarsus taps John Cena for its latest Demodex blepharitis campaign
- Statement on Proposing Registered Offering Reform and Enhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies
- American Aid Worker Tests Positive for Ebola After DRC Exposure
- Listen to the Latest ‘KFF Health News Minute’
- Headache Medicine: Statement on Proposing Releases for Registered Offering Reform and Enhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies
- More Kids Seeking Anxiety Help at Routine Doctor Visits, Study Finds
- Statement on Proposing Releases for Enhancement of Emerging Growth Company Accommodations and Simplification of Filer Status for Reporting Companies, and Registered Offering Reform
- Global MedTech Contract Manufactures Finalize Merger
- Global MedTech Contract Manufactures Finalize Merger
- Carl Zeiss Meditec Plans Up to 1,000 Job Cuts Amid Restructuring Effort
- Carl Zeiss Meditec Plans Up to 1,000 Job Cuts Amid Restructuring Effort
- Signatera CDx Gets FDA Nod as Companion Diagnostic for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
- Signatera CDx Gets FDA Nod as Companion Diagnostic for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
- Boston Scientific announces strategic investment in MiRus LLC
- Boston Scientific announces strategic investment in MiRus LLC
- Weed/Opioid Combo Doesn't Help Knee Arthritis Pain
- Losing A Parent Can Dent An Adult's Earning Power
- Ticks Can Creepy-Crawl Your House For Weeks Before Dying, Study Shows
- Kids Keep Getting Stuck in Hospitals, Even After Being Cleared For Discharge
- Short, Intense Radiation Therapy Safe For Prostate Cancer Patients
- Efforts To Understand the Nation’s Drugged Driving Problem Stall Under Trump
- Somewhere Between Cacophony and Euphony
- Ebola Outbreaks in Africa Trigger Global Health Emergency, U.S. Travel Warnings
- Rapid Weight Loss Beats Slow and Steady in New Clinical Trial
- Medtronic Bets on Cardiovascular Realignment Amid Stock Pressure and Facility Closures
- Medtronic Bets on Cardiovascular Realignment Amid Stock Pressure and Facility Closures
- Smog Linked To Lewy Body Dementia Risk, Major Study Finds
- NYC Mold Removal Program Cut Asthma ER Cases By A Quarter, Study Says
- Pregnancy Safe For Women With Myasthenia Gravis, Study Concludes
Should Americans live in fear? Should patients be denied pain control?
Everyone agrees the answers should be NO.
Yet, here we are.
Another excellent view inside the clinical world from the KevinMD blog.
https://www.kevinmd.com/2023/07/the-persecution-of-pain-management-doctors.html
The persecution of pain management doctors
She and I had discussed the dangers of continuing to treat pain, knowing that the DEA wanted to make some examples, and several doctors in our state had suffered criminal charges. The complaints published about their practices left us bewildered. They had charged cash, treated patients under the age of fifty, and had patients that traveled long distances. Another was charged with complaints of his having treated people he knew (or should have known) suffered from addiction. They were also criticized that a percentage of their patients had criminal records, quoting a percentage. I wondered where the doctor could go to get accurate criminal record information. More importantly, when I checked the quoted percentage, it was lower than our state average. But more importantly, since when can a doctor not treat someone who has a criminal conviction? Finally, I noticed that the DEA was quoting morphine dose/milligram equivalents, leaving the press and the public with the impression that these were individual pills. I wrote a letter to the reporter trying to correct these misstatements but never saw a correction.
Then a third doctor was hit. She had prescribed Xanax to a patient in crisis at a McDonald’s parking lot. Not a crime, but then she panicked and lied about it when questioned by federal agents, allowing herself to fall victim to 18USC1001: lying to a federal agent. The first physician was 71 years old, pleaded guilty to one count of prescribing a Schedule IV medication, which was supposed to have a maximum term of five years in prison. But the government argued what it calls “relevant conduct,” at which they attribute any patient deaths as “related to” the prescriptions. The doctor was sentenced to 120 months in federal prison. The second doctor pleaded guilty to wrongfully prescribing alprazolam and was sentenced to four years in prison. Finally, the third doctor was sentenced, also for alprazolam. In this case, the government agreed that no prison time was necessary, but the judge felt that a message should be sent to physicians treating pain and sentenced her to three years.
These events were worrisome as none of the complaints listed are actually crimes. I had, in fact, taken hundreds of hours of CME in pain management and addiction, and no one had listed age, criminal history, or payment method as problems. My practice had set up very strict procedures and protocols to avoid diversion and monitor for signs of addiction. I had joined both the American Academy of Pain Medicine and the American Society of Addiction Medicine and was taking board review courses, as I find these to be excellent ways to stay up to date. I had even traveled to take in-person classes held by Harvard Medical School. Everyone in our practice who received controlled medications had counseling made available to them, and we would not accept a patient for opiate therapy unless they came to us already on opiates with a chronic pain diagnosis made and confirmed byother medical professionals and specialists. We did make an exception for patients with cancer, as oncologists were referring patients to us for maintenance treatment.
I searched my calendar to see how I could reschedule patients to help my friend keep her practice alive until she could retain counsel and defend herself to the board. While I was doing this, my receptionist told me that a sheriff’s deputy wanted to see me. A cold feeling came over me, and I woodenly shook his hand and accepted the envelope he handed me. Inside was my emergency order of suspension from the medical board. It turned out that a disgruntled former employee had called an insurance company pretending to be a patient and had complained that I was “treating addicts.” The insurance investigated and found that some patients had died within thirty days of being treated by us. Since we saw all of our patients every thirty days, this would be the case no matter why they had died. It turns out that today, any patient that dies while taking opiates is listed as an “opiate-associated” death, even if they die in hospice or by suicide. I even had a patient who died in police custody, twenty hours after last taking his medications and after being denied proper medical care. The jail told his family he had died of an overdose, despite the coroner’s finding on autopsy that he died from a cardiac condition.
The insurance company investigation found that our treatment had been reasonable but felt they had to notify the medical board. The medical board felt they had to issue an emergency order of suspension without giving me a chance to defend my practice. When I finally went in front of them, the suspension of my license was lifted, and I thought the ordeal was over. Instead, law enforcement officers went on the news to say that the board had been too easy on me, and I was indicted that same day. I did not plead guilty but took it to trial. The government wanted to give me twenty to life for the patient who died in police custody. I took the stand in my defense and tried to help the jury understand the complications of medical practice and the risks and benefits of opiate therapy. I explained that I was certified to treat addiction, and that while my patients on opiate therapy did not have addiction, even if they did, the benefits of treatment could outweigh the risks. The government’s expert testified that MRIs were not objective, that a veteran treated with methadone for pain meant he had addiction, that a man with a hand crushed so badly that a finger was pulled off did not have “real” pain and should not have been treated. The fact that I had cut him back from three opiates to two and from two benzodiazepines to one on that first visit went right over the jury’s heads, as well as the fact that I had reduced his opiates sixty days and his benzodiazepines thirty days before his death.
The government’s expert testified that when my chart notes referenced my concern about the potential for addiction, that this was absolute proof that the patient had addiction. The prosecutor told the jury in closing that we only accepted patients already on opiates because it was easier to get them addicted. None of these statements are true, but I was shocked to find that you can’t use the textbook in your defense. You also cannot use the content of your CME in your defense. You have to rely on experts, most of whom are now too terrified to testify for the defense, and the government can have their witness make statements completely contrary to the scientific practice of medicine. I was found not responsible for the death but convicted for treating the patient at all, as I had placed him “at risk” of addiction. I was also convicted for treating the veteran who had been prescribed methadone, despite him testifying that I was a compassionate doctor who had always tried to help him reduce the opiate medications he came to me on. I am waiting for sentencing and looking at up to twenty years in prison. If I could offer any word of advice, it would be for all primary care physicians to stop treating pain until this insanity is rectified, as it is impossible to educate a jury in a week. And there is no limit to what the government can say to get a conviction. They are not bound by truth or science. Also, if you come under prosecution, hire only a health care prosecution specialized attorney. Do not trust that any other attorney will understand things well enough to adequately defend you.
Dr. L. Joseph Parker is a research physician in Texarkana, Arkansas. He received his medical degree from Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science and has been in practice for more than 20 years.
The Wall Street Journal reports on another effect of the war on pain drugs.
Rite Aid Prepares Bankruptcy That Would Halt Opioid Lawsuits
The drugstore chain is preparing a chapter 11 filing within weeks and doesn’t have an agreement with opioid plaintiffs, people familiar with its plans said
Rite Aid faces lawsuits alleging it contributed to the opioid epidemic.
Listen to article Length(2 minutes)Rite Aid is preparing to file for bankruptcy in coming weeks to address mass federal and state lawsuits the drugstore chain is facing over its alleged role in the sale of opioids, according to people familiar with the company’s plans.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/rite-aid-prepares-bankruptcy-that-would-halt-opioid-lawsuits-69f94242
Although the rest of the article is paywall-protected, the audio version adds to the story.
Next Up: Dentists!!!
https://www.upi.com/Health_News/2024/02/06/dentists-pain-control-guidelines/3551707239073/
New dental guidelines limit use of opioids for teens, adults
By Dennis Thompson, February 6, 2024New guidelines from the American Dental Association (ADA) are cracking down on the use of opioids for tooth pain.
The guidelines say that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) taken alone or alongside acetaminophen should be the first-line treatment for managing short-term dental pain in teenagers and adults.
The available medical evidence indicates that those medications can effectively manage pain from a toothache or after a tooth removal, an ADA guideline panel concluded.
The guidelines also say that opioid painkillers should be prescribed under limited circumstances, after considering any risk factors for opioid misuse.
Dentists should avoid providing "just in case" opioid prescriptions for patients, and use extreme caution in prescribing opioids to teens and young adults, the guidelines say.
Patients also should be educated on proper storage and disposal of opioid drugs, according to the guidelines.
The guidelines were developed under a $1.5 million grant handed down by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2020 to develop guidelines for handling dental pain in patients.
"We hope this clinical practice guideline will reduce the risk of opioid addiction, overdose and diversion," Marta Sokolowska, deputy center director for substance use and behavioral health at the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in an ADA news release.
A previous set of recommendations for pediatric patients was published in 2023.
Over-the-counter NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen and naproxen sodium. There also are prescription-strength NSAIDs available for more severe pain.
"It's important to take special consideration when prescribing any type of pain reliever, and now dentists have a set of evidence-based recommendations to determine the best care for their patients," said senior author and panel chair Dr. Paul Moore, a professor emeritus at the University of Pittsburgh's School of Dental Medicine.
"Patients are encouraged to discuss pain management expectations and strategies with their dentist so they can feel confident that they are receiving the safest, most effective treatment for their symptoms," Moore said.
The new guidelines appear Monday in the Journal of the American Dental Association.
"Evidence-based" and "paid for by the government" for some reason fail to stoke my confidence that guidelines are based solely on patient well-being.
Some anecdotes:
The Door Was Locked: When Pain Clinics Disappear and Lawmakers Dismiss the FalloutBy David Manney | June 24, 2025
Three more Americans share how bureaucracy, policy failure, and indifference deepen the pain.
It’s a strange thing, that moment when you realize the world doesn’t see you anymore. You’re standing in front of a door that used to open. A place that once gave you some sliver of relief. But now it’s locked. No note on your phone. No warning. No follow-up. No care. Just a door that doesn’t open. Pain, as always, stays.Behind that locked door isn’t just a shuttered clinic. It’s the final echo of trust in a system that no longer pretends to function. The war on opioids didn’t kill addiction. It just redirected the cruelty.
Steve in Tennessee: The Locked Door and the Flood
Steve’s story begins more than half a century ago. Chronic pain has been his companion since his twenties. Over the years, he found some stability through managed care: a daily regimen of 215mg of morphine sulfate extended-release and low-dose oxycodone for breakthrough pain. It wasn’t comfortable. It was a function.
Then came the bureaucracy. In Tennessee, patients with pain management needs are often limited to one clinic, one pharmacy, and one provider. Change any of those, and you risk losing everything. The process is rigid, overcrowded, and indifferent.
Steve describes it plainly. “You can’t move your prescription. You can’t change pain clinics. Appointments last 15 minutes or can be scheduled for the entire day. I’ve waited four hours. Once, I had to leave for five hours, then return before closing, just to be seen.”
But the worst blow came without warning.
“I arrived at my pain clinic and found a note on the door,” Steve wrote. “The clinic had permanently closed. Two weeks before. No calls. No newspaper notice. Just… gone.”
Gone, along with his supply of morphine.
He’d been saving leftovers, one or two pills at a time, preparing for a “rainy day.” That day had turned biblical.
Outraged, Steve contacted his state representative. The reply? Cold and condescending. The state, the rep said, had “worked very hard to make things easier for pain patients.” Steve was told he didn’t understand the system.
But he did. He understood it too well. And he knew how to survive without it.
“My anger was greater than my dependence,” Steve wrote. He weaned himself off morphine entirely. He still manages with lower doses. “It’s a struggle, but I’m managing. I was lucky.”
He ends with a wish that’s less a curse and more a reckoning: “I wish those who make it hard for us had to live with my pain for just one day. Then they would know.”
Jean: Allergic, Responsible, and Still Humiliated
Jean’s story is quieter on the surface but just as cruel. For over eight years, she’s lived with migraines. Not headaches, migraines. The kind that dismantles your life in slow, pounding waves.
Her treatment involved a medication containing codeine, one of the few opioids she can tolerate. Morphine? Off the table. All the codones? Same problem. Her body metabolizes them like poison.
Then came the state requirement: quarterly drug testing just to access the one medication that worked.
Jean refused. The intrusion was humiliating, the assumption clear: if you need relief, you’re probably lying.
So she turned to ibuprofen. Aspirin. Whatever would blunt the edge.
The result? A gastrointestinal bleed was so severe that she ended up in the ER.
Her doctor, sympathetic but powerless, urged her to write a letter to the state. “He asked why they were trying to kill me,” she recalls.
And still, the suspicion followed her. When Jean returned to the ER with shingles, she informed them about her allergies.
“They thought I was just there for the ‘good stuff,’” she said. They failed to diagnose shingles even after the rash broke out. And then came the kicker: “They asked if I wanted some ‘fentanyl to go.’”
Jean is a sixty-something professional woman. She’s used her voice. She’s warned others. The rules play her. And still, she’s been treated like a junkie at every turn.
“I resent being treated like an addict,” she said. “I have a legitimate need, and I use medication responsibly. But I worry about the future. My doctor is nearing retirement. When he’s gone, I don’t know what happens next.”
She asked for anonymity, not out of shame, but out of fear. Real, understandable fear. Because every time the rules change, she’s the one left exposed.
Beckie: The Bomb in Her Leg and the Wall of Indifference
Beckie lives in the heartland. She shattered her femur in February. The surgeon described it like a bomb had gone off inside her leg: bone fragments shredded muscle, tendons, ligaments. Repair required a full-length rod, screws, and plates from hip to knee.
She was sent home nine days later. No infection, no MRSA, but only because she escaped the hospital quickly enough.
Her discharge instructions? Ten days of oxycodone. After that, Tylenol. That’s it.
Beckie explained her medical history: 30 years of undetected Hepatitis C, cirrhosis, and a warning from a liver specialist to avoid NSAIDs or risk further liver damage.
She pleaded. She asked for Tramadol, a mild opioid. She was denied. The surgeon told her it was out of his hands. She’d need to go to pain management.
However, pain management requires monthly visits. Urine samples. Pill counts. And a primary physician that she didn’t have. No insurance for eight years. No way to pay out-of-pocket.
She’s now 66 years old, surviving on $2,200 a month from Social Security and a pension. Her life has shrunk. She lives alone. Basic care is now painful, and the fear of making the pain worse means she does even less. The dark thoughts have come. So has the spiritual fatigue.
“When it gets really tough, I recite Philippians 4:13,” she said. “It helps me through the pain, but it never resolves the pain.”
Her grandson, just 30 years old, already has three compressed discs. He has a partner. Three kids. No relief. No options. Just pain and swallowed frustration.
“I worry more for him than me,” she wrote. “I’ve had my life. But the way this system treats pain? It’s not built to help. It’s built to deny.”
She ended with a brutal truth: “Someone else’s tragedy shouldn’t mean I have to suffer. I didn’t cause the addiction crisis. Why should I be punished for it?”
Where Policy Becomes Punishment
In each of these stories, the same pattern reappears: guidelines become a punishment, and pain becomes suspicion, while those in power hide behind the phrase out of my hands.
Tennessee’s guidelines aren’t unique. Most states begin with federal recommendations and then add additional restrictions. Why do they do this? To avoid liability and appear tough on paper, the human cost is often buried in paperwork.
Steve’s locked door.
Jean’s fentanyl insult.
Beckie’s rod and no relief.
These aren’t edge cases. They are the new normal.
The CDC quietly walked back its 2016 guidelines because it knew it caused suffering. But the damage was done.
Final Thoughts
These stories aren't outliers. Their signal flares were fired up by people who were ignored and insulted but still kept fighting.
They don't want pity. They want dignity.
And they’re not alone.
To those reading this column, if you're in pain or know someone who is, tell your story. Loudly. Publicly. We need more noise because silence helps the system, not the sufferer.
Let the lawmakers see who they’re really writing off.
Let the media understand that the “opioid crisis” is more than a headline. It’s a policy of sanctioned neglect.
As Beckie reminded us, quoting Mark Twain: “Nothing so needs mending as other people's bad habits.” That includes the habits of lawmakers who punish the innocent to look like they’re helping the guilty.
We’ll keep telling these stories.
And we’ll keep writing.
Until someone listens.
Got a Story? I Want to Hear It.
If you live with chronic pain and have been pushed aside, doubted, or punished by the very system meant to help you, I’m listening.
You don’t need to write a novel. Just say what you need to say. You can share as much or as little as you like.
And if you’d prefer to stay anonymous, that’s absolutely fine. I’m not a government agency or research lab. I’m not running numbers.
I’m just trying to tell the truth, your truth.
Not to sensationalize suffering. But to hold the system accountable for what it’s done to real people: mothers, workers, veterans, neighbors.
People who didn’t ask for pain but live with it every day.
You can send your story by clicking the “TIPS” button and including your email address so I can follow up if needed. Please include my name at the beginning of your message so I can ensure I receive it.
Please let me know if you would like to remain anonymous again. If not, I’ll simply use your first name and where you’re from if you include it.
Normally, we [PJ Media] keep these columns behind our paywall, but this is a special glimpse into this important series.
Get MHF Insights
News and tips for your healthcare freedom.
We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.















