MHF Community Board
Notifications
Clear all

Stanford Study of Paxlovid for Long COVID Stopped Early - MedPage Today

2 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
702 Views
Abigail Nobel
(@mhf)
Member Admin
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 1183
Topic starter  

Nobody is saying what the glitch is, but Paxlovid may not be the solution COVID Long-haulers have been looking for.

— Enrollment was halted earlier than planned after interim analysis

Enrollment into a small trial of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for long COVID -- one that previously garnered attention for investigators not wearing masks -- has been stopped early after an interim analysis, Stanford University confirmed to MedPage Today.

Two sources familiar with the STOP-PASC study told MedPage Today that trial enrollment had been halted. One was told by a study coordinator that a preliminary review found "inconclusive evidence" for the primary outcome of the study. Another said their first appointment was canceled just a few days before it was supposed to take place, and they were later told that all future enrollment had been halted.

"I've had neurological long COVID for more than 2 years and this was the first time I had an opportunity to participate in a trial testing a potential drug therapy," the participant whose visit was canceled told MedPage Today. "I was so eager to give it a try, I spent money from my dwindling savings account to pay for [my] trips."

Stanford Medicine spokesperson Lisa Kim confirmed that "new enrollment is closing slightly earlier than original projections based on a planned interim analysis reviewed by an external monitoring committee."

"There are no safety concerns with the study and enrolled participants are encouraged to complete follow-up activities as planned," she added.

Kim did not provide further comment on what was found during the interim analysis and did not comment on the "inconclusive" results mentioned by the study coordinator to the source.

In May, MedPage Today reported that some participants were concerned that some investigators were not wearing masks during clinic visits, potentially putting the participants at risk.

According to ClinicalTrials.gov, the study design specified two-way masking, for both investigators and participants. Neither Stanford nor study sponsor Pfizer would comment on whether or not the masking issue factored into the decision to stop the study early.

Pfizer spokesperson Jerica Pitts said Pfizer "funded the study and provided clinical supplies of Paxlovid and the placebo comparator at no cost." She also confirmed that new enrollment is closed at this time, "and the investigators plan to share final results as soon as the study is completed. We look forward to reviewing these results once available and will use the insights gathered to help inform planned and future studies."

STOP-PASC is a phase II study that sought to enroll 200 participants. It is not clear how many enrolled before recruitment closed.

Participants would receive a 15-day course of either nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or placebo plus ritonavir. Stanford and Pfizer did not comment on why the placebo group also received a protease inhibitor.

The study called for five patient visits over a total of 15 weeks, with the therapy or placebo given for the first 15 days. The estimated completion date was November 2023, according to ClinicalTrials.gov. The study's primary outcome is the difference at 10 weeks between the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and placebo arms for any of six core symptoms of post-acute sequelae SARS-CoV-2 infection, or PASC: "fatigue, brain fog, dyspnea, body aches, gastrointestinal symptoms, cardiovascular symptoms."

Stanford spokesperson Kim said the results of the STOP-PASC trial "will be shared as soon as the study is completed," and that the study should be published "sometime before the end of the year" but that there is no definite timeline.

ClinicalTrials.gov currently lists the status of the study incorrectly as "recruiting."

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/105295

 

Kristina Fiore leads MedPage’s enterprise & investigative reporting team. She’s been a medical journalist for more than a decade and her work has been recognized by Barlett & Steele, AHCJ, SABEW, and others. Send story tips to k.fiore@medpagetoday.com.



   
ReplyQuote
Abigail Nobel
(@mhf)
Member Admin
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 1183
Topic starter  

This well-written narrative from Science brings out similarities between post-vax and post-infection symptoms. Too long to quote in full.

Rare link between coronavirus vaccines and Long Covid–like illness starts to gain acceptance

Studies probe unusual cases of neurologic complications, blood pressure swings, and other side effects

3 JUL 2023 | 4:30 PM | BYGRETCHEN VOGEL, JENNIFER COUZIN-FRANKEL

... Cases seem very rare—far less common than Long Covid after infection. Symptoms can include persistent headaches, severe fatigue, and abnormal heart rate and blood pressure. They appear hours, days, or weeks after vaccination and are difficult to study. But researchers and clinicians are increasingly finding some alignment with known medical conditions. One is small fiber neuropathy, a condition Oaklander studies, in which nerve damage can cause tingling or electric shock–like sensations, burning pain, and blood circulation problems. The second is a more nebulous syndrome, with symptoms sometimes triggered by small fiber neuropathy, called postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). It can involve muscle weakness, swings in heart rate and blood pressure, fatigue, and brain fog.

...Another team scanned for postvaccine POTS across a specific population. Researchers led by cardiologists Alan Kwan and Susan Cheng at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center analyzed a health database of almost 285,000 people in the Los Angeles area; all had received at least one COVID-19 shot. They found that within 90 days after a shot, the rate of POTS-related symptoms was about 33% higher than in the 3 months before; 2581 people were diagnosed with POTS-related symptoms after vaccination, compared with 1945 beforehand. However, the study found a bigger effect from COVID-19 itself: The rate of POTS symptoms in about 12,000 unvaccinated people after infection was 52% higher than beforehand. Although Kwan cautions against extrapolating these numbers to a wider population, he says the pattern is intriguing. “Our data show a relatively clear signal that there probably is an increase in POTS after vaccination and after infection,” he says....

https://www.science.org/content/article/rare-link-between-coronavirus-vaccines-and-long-covid-illness-starts-gain-acceptance



   
ReplyQuote
Q

Get MHF Insights

News and tips for your healthcare freedom.

We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.

 

Name(Required)
Zip Code(Required)
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Sponsors

Friends of MHF

MHF Community Forum thumbnail

Kirsten DeVries

Tom & Karen Nunheimer

Steve Ahonen

Ron & Faith Bosserman

Marlin & Kathy Klumpp

Sign Up for MHF Insights to keep up on the latest in Michigan Health Policy

Name(Required)
Zip Code(Required)
This field is hidden when viewing the form

5 great non profit logos 2021 - 2025
Michigan Healthcare Freedom Candid

Click here to join the MHF Community Forum!

Grow the community on our social media pages.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial