
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is federally-funded and administered by states. However, funds also loop through the USDA, state universities, farmers' markets, online grocery purchasing, restaurant meals, and much more, according to the MDHHS home page.
Mackinac Center's Michigan Capitol Confidential undertook the deep dive to expose SNAP's vulnerability to fraud. Surprise! It turns out both state and federal levels are culpable.
SNAP fraud skyrockets as Michigan sends 738 new Bridge cards a day
Food stamp fraud jumped nearly 400% over fiscal year 2023 to 2024
Michigan mailed out roughly 738 Bridge cards every day in 2024 for a total of 269,644 cards, according to a document obtained through a records request.
Cards could be replaced for reasons such as theft, demagnetization of the card, or forgotten PINs. The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services didn’t respond to a request for comment on how many cards were in each category.
More than 1.4 million Michiganders use those cards to buy groceries through the federally funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which is administered by the state. But criminals have infiltrated the program, cloning cards and then draining their funds.
Michigan Capitol Confidential exclusively reported that food stamp fraud jumped by nearly 400% from fiscal year 2023 to 2024. The dollar amount of reported fraud increased from $181,778 to $884,947.
Bridge cards use a magnetic strip that can easily be cloned. Criminals steal funds in several ways: installing a fake card reader at public places, buying compromised log-ins on the dark web and using phishing emails. Meanwhile, banks have, since 2015, protected their customers’ money by embedding chips into debit and credit cards.
Nationwide, annual SNAP fraud totals about $18 billion, Haywood Talcove of LexisNexis Risk Solutions, a company banks and unemployment agencies use to help prevent fraud, told CapCon in an email.
“Michigan’s high rate of card replacements is a clear indicator of that systemic vulnerability,” Talcove wrote in an email. “Much of this fraud is driven by the outdated magnetic stripe technology, which makes it easy for criminal organizations to clone cards and steal from food-insecure families.”
Upgrading to chipped cards would cost Michigan about $8 million, CapCon reported. That change would reduce fraud by around 40%, Talcove said. But it would not, he said, be enough to stop criminal rings that clone terminals of legitimate retailers by using account numbers stolen from the Food and Nutrition Services of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
“We shouldn’t stop at chips,” Talcove wrote. “The future of benefit delivery is a secure digital wallet. It’s less expensive, safer, and faster — and gives states an opportunity to verify whether recipients are still eligible, still residing in the state and still in need.”
Most people who qualify for food stamps also qualify under a federal program for a smartphone, which could be used for a digital wallet.
“While a chip card may cost around $10 per person to issue, the real cost of doing nothing is much higher,” Talcove said. “If Michigan continues to replace roughly 22,000 cards a month, that’s not only a recurring expense — it’s an open door for criminal exploitation."
A previously unreleased email obtained by CapCon through a separate public records request shows that federal officials were aware of international criminals targeting Michigan’s food assistance program.
In a January 2023 email, Tim English, acting associate administrator of SNAP at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, wrote to Stacy Dean, another department official, to warn of a Russian-based group preparing to exploit Michigan’s benefits program.
LexisNexis “shared that they think that Michigan may/will be the next target area based on a Russian-based group working in that area,” the email from English read.
CapCon filed the records request with federal officials on Sept. 27, 2023, and received the documents 599 days later.
The state health department hasn’t responded to a request for comment. But an agency representative testified in April before a subcommittee of the Michigan House Oversight Committee.
Dwayne Haywood, senior deputy director of the economic stability administration, said that Bridge cards use outdated technology.
“I will be honest with you. That's one of the reasons why we are looking at updating the chip and the technology,” Haywood told the Subcommittee on State and Local Public Assistance Programs.
Michigan has continued to replace Bridge cards in 2025. It sent out 20,451 in January, 17,628 in February and 19,324 in March, according to information CapCon received from a records request.
Sunday's Detroit News features an MSU op-ed staunchly defending its SNAP-Ed funding against federal budget cuts.
Opinion: SNAP-Ed cuts will be devastating
Quentin Tyler and Cheryl EschbachIn the national debate over government spending, Michigan’s SNAP-Ed program stands out as a rare example of a public initiative that saves more than it costs. Yet despite its proven impact, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which passed the U.S. Senate and House and now heads to President Donald Trump's desk for signature — includes the full elimination of federal funding for SNAP-Ed.
The impact of these cuts will be devastating for Michigan residents.
In the past year alone, MSU Extension SNAP-Ed reached more than 115,000 Michigan residents with direct education. Evaluations show participants increase fruit and vegetable consumption, drink more water and engage in more physical activity. A recent state-level study out of Illinois showed that for every $1 spent on SNAP-Ed, the return on investment is between $5.36 and $9.54, due to improved health, reduced health care costs and long-term gains in earnings and life expectancy. That return rivals our investments in infrastructure, early childhood education and clean water.
In Michigan, SNAP-Ed is implemented by two key organizations: MSU Extension and the Michigan Fitness Foundation (MFF), in partnership with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. MSU Extension uses its statewide footprint — long a backbone of rural and community support — to embed educators in schools, churches, food pantries and health clinics. MFF extends this work through subgrants to trusted local nonprofits. This public-private model avoids expanding government bureaucracy while maximizing reach and relevance.
SNAP-Ed isn’t just fiscally responsible; it reflects core values across the political spectrum: self-reliance through education, taxpayer accountability and local control. Whether it’s a school garden in Grand Rapids or a senior cooking class in Alpena, SNAP-Ed meets people where they are with dignity and practical tools for lifelong health.
As Michigan’s land-grant university, MSU has a 160-year commitment to public service and community-based education. SNAP-Ed is central to that mission. MSU Extension SNAP-Ed employs more than 120 staff embedded in counties across all 83 Michigan counties, working with more than 1,000 partner organizations and 200 local coalitions.
Michigan State University exists to bring education, innovation and practical solutions directly to the people. With deep roots in agricultural science and community engagement, MSU has long played a critical role in strengthening Michigan’s food systems. SNAP-Ed is a natural extension of that mission — one of the most effective tools we have to fight hunger, improve public health and empower communities across the state, and now it's gone.
Programs like SNAP-Ed don’t need cuts, they need our support. By investing in SNAP-Ed, we invest in Michigan’s health, economy and future. These programs empower families with the tools to make healthier choices and connect food dollars to local producers, creating lasting community benefits.
Quentin R. Tyler is director of Michigan State University Extension and senior associate dean for Outreach and Engagement. Cheryl Eschbach is director of the Michigan State University Extension Health and Nutrition Institute