- Journalists Shed Light on Deadly Hantavirus Outbreak and a Crisis in the Nation’s ERs
- Is the horizon still bright for orthodontists?
- The Make America Healthy Again Movement Comes for Hospital Food
- What’s driving physicians to early retirement
- Why Tenet’s CEO says ASCs keep choosing USPI
- 12 recent hospital, health system president exits
- Hospitals embrace rapid opioid treatment in fentanyl era: Study
- Texas systems open 200-bed behavioral health center
- 32 health systems spending $5B on cancer care
- Sanford, North Memorial planned combination adds to Minnesota healthcare deal wave
- Lone Peak Dental Group acquires Arizona practice
- Inside Northwestern Medicine’s battle against surgeon burnout
- UT Austin launches Epic ahead of new academic medical center
- Ohio system names COO
- Buy, sell or fight: The new calculus of health system growth
- OpenAI’s growing healthcare footprint
- Tennessee optometrist pleads guilty to $6.9M Medicare fraud
- Why Cook County Health’s Medicaid coverage loss strategy is drawing attention
- Akron Children’s chosen for former Ohio college campus site
- Surgery Partners doubles down on orthopedics, robotics as total joint growth hits 14.6%
- The growing war over Anthem’s out-of-network penalty policy
- 3 PDS Health headlines to know in 1 week
- Remarks at the Conference on Financial Market Regulation
- Could ASCs help cardiology move past its ‘breaking point’?
- 3 programs expanding the anesthesia workforce in 2026
- Dad Jokes: Remarks at the 13th Annual Conference on Financial Markets Regulation
- UVM Health targets $300M in cuts, outpatient overhaul amid $280M deficit
- Maine behavioral health provider cites industry pressures in merger
- Dentists opening practices in 1 month
- The Aspen Group names new chief commercial officer
- RFK Jr. Launches Plan To Curb Antidepressant 'Overprescription'
- Georgia mental health provider adds after-hours outpatient program
- AI-augmented behavioral health provider Theris launches out of stealth
- 5 data breaches, settlements impacting cardiology
- Maine hospital adds stroke prevention, cardiac imaging services
- As new tech, AI sweeps the marketing world, Eversana Intouch’s new CEO is ‘comfortable in the gray’
- Sanford Health unveils deal to integrate Minnesota-area North Memorial Health, invest $600M
- Trump plans to fire FDA chief Marty Makary: report
- Trump plans to fire FDA chief Marty Makary: report
- Oregon governor signs behavioral health workforce expansion bills amid shortage
- Remarks at the Special Competitive Studies Project AI+ Expo
- Lawmakers, former FDA leaders and more rally behind mifepristone as Supreme Court weighs telemedicine access to abortion pill
- 5 DSOs making headlines
- Plant-Based Foods May Help Lower Risk of High Blood Pressure
- The ACA exchanges dominated Q1 earnings calls. Here's what payer, health system execs had to say
- Targeted Protein Degradation and Novel Modalities: Getting on the Frontline
- Gilead cranks up Yeztugo first-year sales forecast to $1B on 'unprecedented launch trajectory'
- Capricor Therapeutics files breach-of-contract lawsuit against US partner NS Pharma
- Op-ed: It's time to make more strategic bets on AI in healthcare
- Daiichi Sankyo takes $610M profit hit linked to ADC manufacturing overbuild
- Super Shoes Might Increase Risk Of Running Injuries, Study Says
- TV, Movies Offer Flawed Depictions Of Autism, Add To Delayed Diagnosis, Study Says
- Opioid OD Survivors Have Triple Rate Of Repeat Overdoses Than Previously Estimated
- Revisiting Pharma’s tariff reality
- A New Medicare Option For Weight Loss Drugs: What Older Americans Should Know
- Exposure Therapy Can Successfully Ease Peanut Allergies
- Listen: A Federal Agency Is After Workers’ Health Data, and Critics Are Alarmed
- In California Governor Race, Single-Payer Is a Litmus Test. There’s Still No Way To Pay for It.
- AbbVie’s Skyrizi beats out J&J’s Tremfya in April drug ad spending leaderboard
- Johnson & Johnson launches ‘Generation Fine’ depression project
- Pre-launch efforts linked to lasting drug awareness edge: report
- GSK tees up a Modern Family for meningitis messaging
- NYC invests $12M in overdose recovery workforce
- Aspen Dental to pay $2M to settle allegations of violating corporate dentistry laws
- Texas dental practice relocates into 6K-square-foot facility
- Medit launches global orthodontics division, acquires California training institute
- Pennsylvania enacts dental faculty bill
- Cruise Ship Hantavirus Outbreak Kills 3 as WHO Says Risk Is Low
- How policy, reimbursement incentives, could help healthcare address its climate footprint
- Remarks at the 13th Annual Conference on Financial Market Regulation
- 5 best practices for financially integrating behavioral health
- Fierce Pharma Asia—Summit’s surprise interim trial miss; UCB’s $2B Candid buy; J&J’s CAR-T cuts
- Amazon Pharmacy to offer home delivery for Novo Nordisk's Ozempic pill
- New York expands behavioral health data access in EHRs
- Staffing firm Cross Country Healthcare to be acquired by Knox Lane for $437M
- New Hampshire to receive $29.5M in Purdue opioid settlement
- Behavioral health leaders counter HHS ‘overprescribing’ narrative
- Clover Health's MA membership grows 51% year-over-year
- New Study Suggests The Brain Can Continue Learning While In An Unconscious State
- Health Tech Weekly Rundown: Tether rolls out medical AI for phones, wearables; Medaptus launches operational ‘command center’
- Pennsylvania sues Character.ai over AI chatbot allegedly presenting itself as licensed medical professional
- Angelini finds Catalyst for its US growth ambitions with $4.1B buyout
- FDA to reconsider shock rejection of cell therapy Ebvallo. Could uniQure be next?
- Every 1,000 Steps After Surgery Cuts Complication Risk, Study Finds
- Bullying and Politics Fuel Suicide Risk for LGBTQ+ Teens and Young Adults, Survey Finds
- Head Impacts May Disrupt Gut Health Even Without Concussion
- Class of Migraine Drug, CGRP Inhibitors, Has Added Benefit: Reduced Glaucoma Risk
- States Eye Aid to Prop Up Distressed Hospitals Amid Federal Medicaid Cuts
- That Discount at the Pharmacy Counter May Pack Hidden Costs
- Trump Promised Cheaper Drugs. Some Prices Dropped. Many Others Shot Up.
- Hims & Hers debuts its first AI care agent to interpret biomarker lab results
- Alnylam rebuked by FDA over efficacy claims on Amvuttra website
- Insulet CEO details ‘Scrubs’ device promotion win as it boosts awareness, education drive
- Oscar Health's profit hits $679M, membership rises in Q1
- Joint Commission, NACHC partner on training, new accreditation for community health centers
- Ardent Health touts outpatient growth, checked labor spend during hectic Q1
- FDA Authorizes Fruit-Flavored Vapes for Adults
- Sanofi asks to pull Tzield bid from FDA's controversial CNPV program: report
- FDA rolls out 1-day assessment pilot in bid to refocus inspection resources
- Nearly 8 in 10 employers say GLP-1 coverage drives up benefit costs: Business Group on Health
- Edibles + Alcohol Combo Poses Driving Risks Missed by Sobriety Tests
- Leapfrog Group's latest safety grades have far fewer low scores since removal of non-participating hospitals
- VR Training Helps Autistic People Navigate Police Encounters
- Novo CEO cites pricing 'sweet spot' as Wegovy pill debuts with $355M quarter
- Weight Loss Surgeries Fall More Than 20% As Patients Turn To GLP-1 Meds, Experts Say
- FDA blocks publication of COVID, shingles vaccine safety studies: NYT
- Bayer diagnoses how to build trust in cell and gene therapies
- Amwell boasts higher than expected renewals, retention despite Q1 revenue decline
- First Psych Ward Stay Signals Long-Term Mental Health Struggles For Nearly All Patients
- Why Melatonin Shouldn't Be A Bedtime Go-To For Kids
- Children Living Near Gas Stations Have Higher Cancer Risk, Study Finds
- The timing is right for psychedelics manufacturer Optimi Health's IPO
- HHS' Healthy Food Agenda Puts Hospitals On Notice About Patients' Meals
- A New Medicare Option for Weight Loss Drugs: What Older Americans Should Know
- Trump’s Drug Strategy Aims To Bolster Addiction Services — Despite Gutting of Government Support
- Inside the gaps in fertility and surrogacy systems
- CVS execs say company on track to meet MA margin goals by 2028
- Facilitating Access to Trump Accounts
- Fixing Failures to Communicate
- Hinge Health lifts 2026 outlook after strong Q1 as it expands to new conditions
- For nonprofit hospitals, pricey management consultants haven't yielded better performances: study
- Supreme Court Issues Stay, Keeping Abortion Pill Mifepristone Available by Mail For Now
- Statement on Proposing Release for Semiannual Reporting
- Quarterly Questions: Statement on the Proposed Amendments to Allow Semiannual Reporting
- Statement on Proposing Semiannual Reporting
- Wellstar partners with BD to implement AI-driven medication management system
- Listen to the Latest ‘KFF Health News Minute’
- Newer Migraine Drugs Reduce Headache Days With Fewer Side Effects
- New Drug Combo Effective Against Treatment-Resistant IBD, Trials Show
- New Warning Labels Might Help People Cut Back On Drinking
- Ozempic Can Curb Cravings in Alcohol Use Disorder, Landmark Trial Finds
- US on the Brink of Losing Measles-free Status, Study Warns
- Delays in Visa Program Threaten Doctor Placements in Underserved Areas
- States Eye Aid To Prop Up Distressed Hospitals Amid Federal Medicaid Cuts
- Supreme Court Puts Brakes on Abortion Pill Restrictions
- FDA Green Lights Expanded Access to Pancreatic Cancer Drug, Daraxonrasib
- Online Misinformation Adding To Americans' Skin Cancer Risk, Survey Finds
- Medtronic’s Updated Mitral Valve, Mosaic Neo, Gets FDA approval
- Medtronic’s Updated Mitral Valve, Mosaic Neo, Gets FDA approval
- Social Media Videos, Easy Access Raise Risk of Teen Inhalant Use
- Staff Statement Regarding Pooled Employer Plans
- Sonire Therapeutics Initiates First U.S. Clinical Study of Ultrasound-Guided HIFU Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer
- Sonire Therapeutics Initiates First U.S. Clinical Study of Ultrasound-Guided HIFU Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer
- Edwards Lifesciences Shares Ten-Year Pivotal Data Supporting Long-Term Durability of Resilia Tissue
- Edwards Lifesciences Shares Ten-Year Pivotal Data Supporting Long-Term Durability of Resilia Tissue
- 'Fitspirational' Posts Can Be More Harmful Than Motivational, Review Concludes
- Parents’ Stress Tied to Children’s Mental Health, New Survey Finds
- Surgeon Multitasking Increases Death Risk Of Organ Transplantees
- When Natural Disasters Strike, Another Crisis Hits Those Recovering From Opioid Addiction
- FDA Recalls Several Ghirardelli Powdered Beverages Over Potential Contamination
Like Michigan, Colorado banned counselors from helping patients overcome gender dysphoria to become reconciled to their genetic sex.
Please note: I avoid the term "conversion therapy" here, because it's a made-up term, designed to frame the argument to the Left's advantage. Michigan even embedded the new definition in our legal code, attempting to make it stick.
The Left invented the term "conversion therapy" as a take-off from "aversion therapy," rightly hated and abandoned in the last century. I'm old enough to remember electric shock therapy, and that "treatment" has nothing to do with today's counseling for dysphoria.
Thankfully, a Christian Colorado counselor took on the state law's violation of First Amendment rights, and SCOTUS has granted certiorari.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/10/politics/conversion-therapy-supreme-court-colorado/index.html?
Supreme Court to review Colorado law barring conversion therapy for minors
CNN — The Supreme Court on Monday said it would review a Colorado law that bars mental health professionals from practicing “conversion therapy” for minors, a discredited practice that attempts to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.Kaley Chiles, a licensed counselor and practicing Christian, challenged that law under the First Amendment, claiming that her patients voluntarily seek out her services.
Chiles, who was represented by the religious group Alliance Defending Freedom, argued that the laws enacted in Colorado and more than 19 other states “silence counselors’ ability to express views their clients seek.” But state officials countered that they may regulate the medical treatment of patients.
“A professional’s treatment of her patients and clients is fundamentally different, for First Amendment purposes, from laypersons’ interactions with each other,” Colorado officials said.
The case, similar to one the Supreme Court rejected in late 2023 from a licensed marriage and family counselor in Washington state, echoes another high profile case pending on the docket. In US v. Skrmetti, Tennessee is defending a ban on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender youth on the grounds that the state had broad power to regulate medicine.
In that case, the court’s conservatives signaled during oral arguments in December that they were prepared to defer to state lawmakers on such bans. A decision is expected by July.
Critics say conversion therapy – which attempts to convert people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning – into straight or cisgender people, causes serious emotional harm and can have deadly results.
Chiles sued over the Colorado law in 2022. A federal district court denied her request to temporarily suspend its enforcement and the Denver-based 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision. Chiles appealed to the Supreme Court in November.
In a similar appeal rejected by the high court in 2023, three conservative justices – Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas – said they would have considered the case.
Under the state law, Thomas wrote in five-page opinion, “licensed counselors cannot voice anything other than the state-approved opinion on minors with gender dysphoria without facing punishment.”
“Although the court declines to take this particular case, I have no doubt that the issue it presents will come before the court again,” he wrote at the time. “When it does, the court should do what it should have done here: grant certiorari to consider what the First Amendment requires.”
Alito said in a brief dissent in 2023 that the court should have taken up the case to address an issue that lower courts have been divided on.
“In recent years, 20 States and the District of Columbia have adopted laws prohibiting or restricting the practice of conversion therapy,” Alito wrote. “It is beyond dispute that these laws restrict speech, and all restrictions on speech merit careful scrutiny.”
CNN’s Devan Cole contributed to this report.
The First Amendment triumphed at the Supreme Court today. AG Nessel has the sadz:
Supreme Court rules against Colorado ban on ‘conversion therapy’ for LGBTQ+ kids
By Lindsay Whitehurst - March 31, 2026WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled against a law banning “conversion therapy” for LGBTQ+ kids in Colorado, one of about two dozen states that ban the discredited practice.
An 8-1 high court majority sided with a Christian counselor who argues the law banning talk therapy violates the First Amendment. The justices agreed that the law raises free speech concerns and sent it back to a lower court to decide if it meets a legal standard that few laws pass.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the court, said the law “censors speech based on viewpoint.” The First Amendment, he wrote, “stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country.”
Gorsuch’s opinion drew support from liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.
A state could similarly not ban talk therapy designed to affirm a minor’s sexual orientation or gender identity, Kagan wrote. “Once again, because the State has suppressed one side of a debate, while aiding the other, the constitutional issue is straightforward,” she wrote.
In a solo dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that states should be free to regulate health care, even if that means incidental restrictions on speech. The decision, Jackson wrote, “opens a dangerous can of worms” that “threatens to impair states’ ability to regulate the provision of medical care in any respect.”
The decision is the latest in a line of recent cases in which the justices have backed claims of religious discrimination while taking a skeptical view of LGBTQ+ rights.
Counselor Kaley Chiles, with support from President Donald Trump’s Republican administration, said the law wrongly bars her from offering voluntary, faith-based therapy for kids.
Chiles contends her approach is different from “conversion therapy” practices from decades ago, like shock therapy. Her attorneys argued that the ban makes it hard for parents to find therapists willing to discuss gender identity with kids unless the counseling affirms transition.
“I look forward to being able to help them when they choose the goal of growing comfortable with their bodies,” Chiles said in a statement. “Counselors walking alongside these young people shouldn’t be limited to promoting state-approved goals like gender transition, which often leads to harmful drugs and surgeries.”
Colorado disagreed, saying its law does allow wide-ranging conversations about gender identity and sexual orientation and exempts religious ministries. The state says the measure simply bars using therapy to try to “convert” LGBTQ+ people to heterosexuality or traditional gender expectations, a practice that has been scientifically discredited and linked to serious harm.
The law doesn’t violate the First Amendment, Colorado argued, because therapy is different from other types of speech since it’s a form of health care that the state has a responsibility to regulate.
Advocates for LGBTQ+ people condemned the ruling, as well as “conversion therapy.”
“This is a dangerous practice that has been condemned by every major medical association in the country. Today’s decision does not change the science, and it does not change the fact that conversion therapists who harm patients will still face legal consequences,” Polly Crozier, director of family policy at GLAD Law, said in a statement.
The 2019 law carries the possibility of fines and license suspension, but no one has been sanctioned under it. The ruling is expected to eventually make similar laws in other states unenforceable.
Chiles was represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal organization that has appeared frequently at the court in recent years. The group also represented a Christian website designer who successfully challenged Colorado anti-discrimination law because she didn’t want to work with same-sex couples.
Twenty-three states have laws barring health care providers from offering “conversion therapy” for minors, and another four have some restrictions, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an advocacy group that tracks policies that impact LGBTQ+ people.
The high court agreed to hear the case after the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver upheld the law. Another Atlanta-based appeals court, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, had struck down similar bans in Florida.
Meanwhile, the Michigan conversion therapy ban written by our Democratic witches' coven in 2023 is about to go as well, after a little pot stirring:
High court decision clears path for challenge to Michigan’s conversion therapy ban
Justices’ decision in Colorado case revives lawsuit against state’s 2023 law
By Katherine Dailey - March 31, 2026A lawsuit brought against the state of Michigan by Catholic Charities of Jackson, Lenawee and Hillsdale Counties will continue to proceed in federal court now that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a case out of Colorado that the state’s ban on conversion therapy should be subject to a high legal standard known as “strict scrutiny” for potential First Amendment violations.
That case, Chiles v. Salazar, was decided on Tuesday in an 8-1 ruling in favor of a Colorado-based licensed therapist who argued that the state law attempted to regulate what she could tell her clients in talk therapy. She argued that the law violates her First Amendment right to free speech and interferes with her ability to practice counseling in a way that aligns with her religious convictions.
The Supreme Court sent the final decision in the case on how to enforce the strict scrutiny test, a more stringent standard of review than had been previously applied, back down to a lower court, though Amy Howe of SCOTUSBlog wrote that the opinion “strongly hinted that the ban would fail that test.”
The ruling from the nation’s top court was quickly criticized by both Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in a press release.
“Today’s ruling is as disappointing as it is harmful,” Nessel said. “Medical experts have long debunked conversion therapy as a destructive, demoralizing and debunked practice which increases depression and the risk of suicide for LGBTQ+ youth. Free speech is a sacred right in America, but it should not provide a runway in which medical professionals can actively harm their patients.
In Michigan, Catholic Charities v. Whitmer had been stayed pending an order from the Supreme Court in the case from Colorado. The law in question has also been paused from being enforced by a preliminary injunction from the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals that was issued in December.
Whitmer signed Michigan’s law against conversion therapy in 2023, making it the 22nd state to have such a ban on the books.
Conversion therapy, which Whitmer defined at the time as “any intervention that attempts to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity,” has been repeatedly disregarded by medical professionals and is largely seen as harmful, especially in terms of increasing suicidality among LGBTQ+ youth.
The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry — in alignment with a number of other medical groups — has said that conversion therapies “lack scientific credibility and clinical utility” and that “there is evidence that such interventions are harmful.” As such, the group states that these kinds of attempted treatments should not be part of any behavioral health treatment for children or teens.
“Today’s Supreme Court ruling is disappointing, but it does not change who we are,” Whitmer said in the press release responding to the decision. “Michigan will never support any practice that harms or shames LGBTQ+ youth. As long as I’m governor, every young person deserves the right to grow up safe, supported, and free to be themselves.”
State Rep. Jason Hoskins (D-Southfield), who wrote the legislation banning the practice, said the decision should not at all be interpreted to mean conversion therapy is ever acceptable.
“Conversion therapy is a fraud. It is malpractice and it is still deeply damaging to young people in Michigan. Every major medical and mental health organization has condemned conversion therapy as unethical and dangerous. The evidence is clear. These practices are linked to higher rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide attempts. That has not changed,” Hoskins said in a statement.
The lawsuit in Michigan is currently before the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, and the press release from Nessel’s office stated that the parties in the case are “expected to meet, confer, and update the District Court within the next 14 days about what should happen next in their case.”
Nessel also noted in the press release that her office is “reviewing today’s decision in advance of our next meeting before the court to determine our next steps.”
And from the peanut gallery:
Rep. Hoskins, Author of Michigan’s Conversion Therapy Ban, Responds to U.S. Supreme Court Decision on Colorado Law
Press Statement | Office of State Rep. Jason HoskinsLANSING, Mich., March 31, 2026 — State Rep. Jason Hoskins (D-Southfield), author of Michigan’s law banning conversion therapy for minors, issued the following statement in response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision striking down Colorado’s law:
“As someone who worked hard to pass legislation banning conversion therapy, I did so because I believe every young person deserves to be safe, supported, and affirmed, not subjected to practices rooted in shame and rejection.
“I want to be clear. The Supreme Court’s decision does not mean conversion therapy is safe, effective, or should ever be acceptable.
“Conversion therapy is a fraud. It is malpractice and it is still deeply damaging to young people in Michigan. Every major medical and mental health organization has condemned conversion therapy as unethical and dangerous. The evidence is clear. These practices are linked to higher rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide attempts. That has not changed.
“What this decision does is make it harder for states to protect young people before harm occurs. It draws a line that is difficult to defend. When treatment involves surgical tools or medication, the state may impose safeguards to prevent harm. But when the same harm is inflicted through a course of treatment delivered in words — talk therapy that can induce shame, reinforce stigma, and are associated with increased rates of depression, trauma, anxiety, and suicidality — the state is left with diminished authority to act. That is wrong.
“And let’s be honest about what this is: families are often paying thousands of dollars for services that do not work and cause real harm. That is not care. That is exploitation.
“This decision does not eliminate accountability. Survivors still have legal options, including consumer fraud claims, medical malpractice suits, and other legal actions to hold bad actors responsible.
“This fight is not over. We will continue to explore every avenue available to protect young people and hold those who harm them accountable, because no child should be made to feel like they need to be ‘fixed’ to be loved.”
A brief but useful legal analysis of SCOTUS' decision in Chiles v. Salazar from Mark Movsesian:
https://reason.com/volokh/2026/04/02/a-short-take-on-chiles-v-salazar/
A Short Take on Chiles v. Salazar
Another religious freedom case in a free speech guise
By Mark Movsesian | April 2, 2026The Supreme Court ruled this week, 8-1, in Chiles v. Salazar, that Colorado may not apply its ban on conversion therapy for minors to prohibit a licensed counselor's talk therapy. Justice Gorsuch wrote for the Court; Justice Kagan concurred, joined by Justice Sotomayor; Justice Jackson dissented. The Court held that, as applied to therapist Kayla Chiles's conversations with clients, Colorado's law discriminates on the basis of viewpoint and therefore triggers the most searching First Amendment scrutiny.
A couple points. First, this is not, formally speaking, a religion case. It's a Free Speech Clause case. Indeed, as far as I can tell, the word "religion" does not even appear in the Court's opinion. But the case is religion-adjacent. Chiles described herself in the litigation as a practicing Christian whose views about sex and gender are informed by her faith, and she said that some clients seek her out because they want counseling consistent with those convictions. So although religion is not part of the Court's doctrinal analysis, it is very much part of the background.
That feature places Chiles in a familiar line of First Amendment cases. Think of 303 Creative, another Gorsuch opinion. Or Barnette, the WWII-era flag salute case. Both were free speech cases in doctrinal terms, but religious conviction supplied much of the underlying human drama. One sees something similar here. Disputes touching religious freedom often come to the Court not under the Religion Clauses, but in the guise of free speech. Religion influences what people say--or don't say.
The key to the Court's reasoning is viewpoint discrimination. Colorado's law allows counseling that affirms a minor's sexual orientation or gender identity, but forbids counseling that seeks to help a minor change or redirect sexual orientation or gender identity. For the Court, that means the State is not simply regulating treatment as such. It is permitting one side of a contested moral and psychological question while suppressing the other. That, the Court says, is about as serious a First Amendment problem as one can have.
Second, it's notable how little work the formal strict-scrutiny framework seems to do once the Court reaches that conclusion. The Court says that content-based restrictions ordinarily trigger strict scrutiny, and that viewpoint discrimination is an especially egregious form of content discrimination. But it does not linger over the familiar steps of balancing: compelling interest, narrow tailoring, least restrictive means. Instead, once the Court identifies viewpoint discrimination, the case is largely over. The rest of the opinion is devoted mostly to rejecting Colorado's efforts to characterize the law as regulation of professional conduct rather than speech. Chiles thus resembles 303 Creative in this way as well. In 303 Creative, too, the Court avoided applying the strict-scrutiny balancing test in a serious way.
For those interested, I discuss Chiles in a short Legal Spirits episode, here.
The only fault with this analysis is its failure to emphasize that both religious freedom and free speech are guaranteed by the same U.S. Constitutional Amendment, The First! There is a very good reason the Founding Fathers assembled related rights in the First amendment.
Get MHF Insights
News and tips for your healthcare freedom.
We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.













