- Aspen Dental targets fast-growing Georgia city for new practice
- Michael Dowling: Now is not the time to abandon gun safety efforts
- A new wording test on ‘Medicare for All’
- UCI Health started as 1 hospital. 50 years and 6 hospitals later, CEO charts its future
- Virtua Health names president of 2 New Jersey hospitals
- Colorado wildfires send dozens to UCHealth hospitals
- Northwell appoints chair of surgery
- How 5 health systems are avoiding a repeat of the 2023 chemo shortage
- Nashville General taps CEO
- NewYork-Presbyterian rolls out OpenEvidence AI across its network
- Oswego Health expands surgery, orthopedic services New York
- Vanderbilt professor elected 40th president of bariatric group
- The ASC tax squeeze is gaining momentum
- The private equity race regulators haven’t caught up to
- Weill Cornell taps new chair of surgery, surgeon-in-chief
- The state-by-state battle over anesthesia time caps
- What happens to ASC contracts when a payer gets absorbed
- What will make or break the future of DSO success
- Dentistry reaches inflection point with AI
- Former UPMC cardiologist drops lawsuit over CEO’s device company ties
- Dental assistant pay vs. cost of living by state
- South Carolina cites behavioral health facility over missing correction plan
- Former Mayo Clinic research director sues system over alleged retaliation for raising AI practice concerns
- Senators urge Defense Department to expand autism therapy coverage under Tricare
- GI consolidation’s new era: 5 deals to know
- The GI procedure cuts in CMS’ pay proposal: 5 things to know
- ‘The economics just don’t work’: CMS’ ACCESS model draws scrutiny
- Washington restricts spit hood use in state psychiatric facilities
- Memorial Hermann Health Plan winds down commercial coverage
- Remarks at the Society for Corporate Governance Conference
- Maryland health system receives $10M gift to construct ASC
- 1-800-Dentist faces class-action lawsuit over data breach
- Staten Island hospital debuts mobile behavioral health program for youth
- CVS' Omnicare unit agrees to $440M settlement with DOJ in ongoing fraud case
- GLP-1 Use Hits Record High As Medicare Opens Access To Weight-Loss Drugs
- Founder of telehealth startup Done sentenced to six years in prison for Adderall fraud scheme
- HHS calls on hospitals to sign 'Make Hospital Food Healthier Pledge'
- Foundation Fights Medical Errors That Claim 200,000 U.S. Lives A Year
- Former exec alleges Alignment Healthcare leaders juiced profits to boost bonuses
- In compensation push, HHS gears up to draft COVID vaccine injury table
- AZ, Ionis shares tumble on ATTR-CM trial flop, but analyst flags over-reaction
- Frazier Healthcare Partners to acquire MatrixCare in $490M deal
- New, Highly Accurate Brush Test Can Detect Mouth Cancer Within An Hour
- Innovative Hip Replacement Cuts Post-Surgery Risk Of Dislocation By 70%
- Global Study Finds Kids Worldwide Skipping Fruits And Vegetables
- Ipsen’s Botox rival Dysport charts new horizons with dual phase 3 wins in migraine
- Affordable Care Act Insurers Want More Premium Increases As Enrollment Sags
- My Search for a Psychiatric Bed in an Overburdened Health System
- Dr. Reddy's presses pause on generic semaglutide supply after flagging API issue
- OpenEvidence launches medical AI copilot feature that grades medical evidence and unveils NewYork-Presbyterian collaboration
- Novo Nordisk asks public to ‘Meet Me in the Middle’ in new obesity experience installation
- BioNTech plots right-sized HER2 ADC launch to ‘build the muscle’ for BMS-partnered bispecific
- Telehealth ex-CEO sentenced in Adderall fraud case: 5 things to know
- Oklahoma awards 4 behavioral health clinic contracts
- The key to patient trust in dentistry
- Good news, bad news for the dental workforce
- 7 behavioral health layoffs to know | 2026
- 200+ dentists making headlines halfway through 2026
- How students are paying for dental school
- Health tech startup Forus inks partnership with GI medical society to improve medication access
- U of Kentucky dental dean receives top educator award
- UnitedHealthcare unveils Lifestyle Spending Accounts for employer plans
- FDA hits Lundbeck with untitled letter over efficacy claims on migraine drug Vyepti
- Sanofi floats flu shot marketing pledges to pacify EU antitrust probe
- 36 behavioral health executive moves to know
- Delaware establishes statewide opioid treatment guidance for EDs
- Tampa General Hospital sues Eli Lilly over pulled 340B discounts
- Viz.ai expands neurodegenerative disease care in new partnership with Cortechs.ai
- E. Coli Outbreak Prompts Recall Of Frozen Blueberries At Publix
- Drinking Coffee May Lower Your Risk of Liver Disease
- FDA halts release of new drug rejection letters while working to formalize policy
- Mass General Brigham nurses, home care clinicians launch largest healthcare strike in state history
- ACA plans set for another year of premium spikes, preliminary filings show
- AI wearables company Vilo launches Signal OS ahead of upcoming smart ring launch
- CureDuchenne lights the candles with DMD public service campaign highlighting birthdays
- Zimmer Biomet to Hire 500 in India as New Bengaluru Technology Centre Drives AI and MedTech Innovation
- Foreign drugmaker caught faking doctors’ petition to evade China’s price cut scheme
- AdaptHealth Investigates Data Breach After Social Engineering Attack, Possible Link to ShinyHunters Emerges
- Keenova gets on the good foot with Xiaflex trial win in rare tissue growth condition
- Evonik plugs $100M into Indiana drug substance plant as US CDMO demand mounts
- Rumination Plays Key Role In Caregiver Stress, Study Says
- U.S. Teens Underestimate Risks Of Fentanyl Use, Survey Finds
- Men More Likely To Be Diagnosed With Advanced Cancer
- Primary care’s AI moment
- Copay Assistance Is Meant To Defray Patient Drug Costs. Some Insurers Keep It Instead.
- Training Program Could Ward Off Injuries Among Soccer Girls
- Affordable Care Act Insurers Want More Premium Increases as Enrollment Sags
- Patients Face a Thicket of Red Tape Trying To Maintain Consistent Health Coverage
- Leo Cancer Care secures $65M to advance upright radiotherapy system as company preps for IPO
- Catalent sells UK facility to Codis, expands Nanoscope partnership
- Allergan Aesthetics helps map paths for young women in STEM with Girls Inc. event
- Nonprofit-private equity joint ventures worth scrutiny, PESP report says
- American Heart Association joins social network Roon for medical research collaboration
- Independent pharmacies hit Prime Therapeutics with antitrust suit over alleged price fixing
- Thousands of Medicare Beneficiaries Thought Their Drug Plan Was Free. Then They Lost It.
- Michigan, Other States See Unusual Spike In Parasite That Causes 'Explosive' Diarrhea
- Statement on the 2026 Regulatory Agenda
- GLP-1 'Secret Shopper' Study Finds Gaps in Online Prescribing
- Applying Agentic AI to Healthcare Delivery: The Key to True Transformation
- From Compliance to Clinical Action: Fixing the Broken Loop in Post-Market Surveillance
- Novartis dismisses 322 more staffers based out of US headquarters
- Bristol lays out KRAS med Krazati's stumble in confirmatory colorectal cancer trial
- Fatty Liver Boosts Odds Of More Deadly Colon Cancer, Study Says
- Weight Loss Surgery Increases Risk Of Alcoholism, Study Says
- IV Vitamin C Might Boost Recuperation Among Trauma Patients
- These Church Members Disagree On Politics. Together They're Wiping Out Medical Debt.
- Exercise Can Ward Off Nicotine Fits, Help Smokers Quit
- Copay Assistance Is Meant To Defray Patient Drug Costs. Some Insurers Keep It Instead.
- Thousands of Medicare Beneficiaries Thought Their Drug Plan Was Free. Then They Lost It.
- On heels of Bain buyout, Tanabe inks deal to sell manufacturing unit and 17 drugs to Towa
- FDA approves Vera’s dual-target Trutakna, setting up IgAN market battle with Novartis, Otsuka
- Vertex, in its largest-ever deal, acquires endocrine disease specialist Crinetics for $10B
- Real Chemistry snaps up Spurwing Communications, launches new Asia Pacific hub
- Skin quality driving widespread quality-of-life issues: survey
- AI care partner Heidi puts a spin on pharma ad tropes in new campaign to relieve 'side effects'
- Nonprofit hospitals are embracing high-risk, high-reward investment portfolios. Is that a problem?
- New California Law Replaces 'Sell By' Labels On Food Packaging
- Study Raises New Questions About Artificial Sweeteners
- Teladoc Health inks multi-year virtual care deal with National Basketball Players Association
- FDA deepens Vertex's Casgevy label, opening treatment for patients as young as 2
- Calling Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Something Else Might Save More Lives, Researchers Argue
- Taking Small Breaks From Sitting Around Can Lower Your Cancer Risk
- Learning Languages Could Net You A Younger Brain, Study Says
- New Disease Threats Follow Trump Administration's Health Program Cuts
- New Medicaid Work Rule Means More Opportunities To Lose Coverage
- In California Governor’s Race, Voters Face Stark Choice on Immigrant Healthcare
- Epic plans to expand 4 executives' roles as President Sumit Rana exits the company
- Journalists Discuss Healthcare Costs’ Political Fallout, Concerns About Canceled ICE Facility
- FDA Lets 20 ZYN Nicotine Pouches Claim Lower Risk Than Cigarettes; Critics Warn Of Danger
- Ultra-Processed Foods Linked To Brain Differences In Young Children
- Prompt Responses From Mom Might Lower A Baby's Risk Of Childhood Mental Health Problems
- Rehab Program Helps Lift Long COVID 'Brain Fog'
- Why Are You Right- Or Left-Handed? Experiments Suggest Surprisingly Simple Explanation
- Rural Americans More Likely To View Cancer As A Death Sentence, Poll Finds
- He Dreamed Of Becoming A Physician Assistant. New Loan Rules May Thwart Him.
- HealthQ Special: Caregiving in the Sandwich Generation
- A Mom Said Infant Formula Killed Her Baby. The Manufacturer Closed the File.
- FDA Scientists Warn Against Expanded Peptide Access As Kennedy Reshapes Advisory Panel
- Regulatory tracker: AbbVie, Genmab's blood cancer bispecific expands label in EU
- Can A Popular Muscle Supplement Help Treat Depression?
- Melatonin Shows Promise As Safe, Cheap Painkiller, Review Concludes
- Heat Dome Coming: Tips To Stay Safe During Extreme Temps
- Diets That Lower Inflammation Might Cut Dementia Risk, Study Indicates
- Vitamins Might Be Key To Asthma Control In Children, Adults
- Remarks at the Economic Club of New York
- Is Your Organization Ready to Govern AI in Regulatory Affairs?
- CMS Proposes TAVR Medicare Coverage is Potential Boost for Edwards Lifesciences
- Remarks to the US-CEE Connection: Transatlantic Challenges in Law, Business & Policy
- Statement Regarding Minimum Pricing Increments and Access Fee Caps
- Statement at the SEC Open Meeting on the Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
Michigan healthcare freedom community forum
Michigan set a record low in 2025 for bills signed into law. For a state that already has 77,944 regulations (2024), fewer new laws is a good thing. if nothing else, it makes it easier for citizens to keep up.
However, as you'll see below, the new mammogram law's implications have escaped the media.
From WLNS Lansing, whose video within the link is a must-see.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/michigan-produced-record-low-number-004531976.html
Michigan produced a record low number of new laws in 2025Brad LaPlante | January 2, 2026
LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — Michigan lawmakers signed into law a record low number of bills in 2025 as the state faces low elementary reading scores, high unemployment and uncertainty in several major job sectors.
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, signed 74 new public acts in 2025, significantly less than the state’s recent average of 383.
With the House controlled by Republicans and the Senate controlled by Democrats, Michigan spent most of the year grappling with a near-state government shutdown that culminated in an eleventh-hour bipartisan budget deal after several missed deadlines.
Despite low production, House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Township) told reporters the Legislature had “the best year” of the seven years Whitmer has been governor. Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids) did not feel the same, saying, “I have a lot to say about this year,” in a floor speech to close the year.
Hall views the low level of production as a positive and vows to enact even fewer laws next year. Brinks told reporters it’s “strange that he is so proud of not doing his job.” House Majority Floor Leader Bryan Posthumus (R-Cannon Township) said on social media that passing fewer bills is a “feature of good government.”
Absent from the Legislature’s final agenda of the year was a jobs-creation package that was promised by Whitmer, Hall, and Brinks. Hall said he was “committed” to the legislation on Off the Record in December, but a package has not yet come to fruition.
In February, a significant economic and labor policy compromise raised the minimum wage on an accelerated path, albeit at a slower pace for tipped workers, and established paid sick leave. The deal avoided the court-ordered upheaval after a Michigan Supreme Court ruling.
When the budget was finally approved for the new fiscal year, the Legislature approved a new 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, with revenue earmarked for roads. The industry immediately sued, arguing that the tax sidestepped the 2018 voter framework, but a judge allowed it to proceed pending appeal. That tax went into effect on Jan. 1, 2026.
Hall’s goal next year is to develop policy for the state’s next governor, who Michigan will elect in November. In addition, every seat in the Legislature will be on the ballot.
Michigan’s Legislature isn’t the only legislative body with lower production; President Donald Trump signed 70 bills from Congress last year despite Republicans controlling both chambers and the presidency.
HFA summarizes mammogram machine deregulation and slightly reduced fees of Senate Bill 136, which become Public Act 63 of 2025.
https://legislature.mi.gov/documents/2025-2026/billanalysis/House/pdf/2025-HLA-0136-MRYXBQ50.pdf
Senate Bill 136 amends the Public Health Code to eliminate certain existing statutory requirements for the use of radiation machines for mammography and to require the Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity (LEO) to develop and issue rules to provide those standards and requirements. The bill also eliminates a requirement that a patient be notified of a mammogram showing dense breast tissue and provisions requiring the governor to appoint a radiation advisory board.
The code has several provisions related to the use of radiation machines for mammography. Generally speaking, they currently require radiation machines used for mammography to be registered with LEO and specifically authorized for use for mammography; provide standards
a radiation machine, facility, and personnel must meet to be authorized; require inspection and certification of the machines at least annually; and allow LEO to issue rules to implement those provisions.The bill retains the registration requirements described above, but removes the authorization and annual inspection provisions, as well as the prescribed standards, and instead requires LEO to issue standards for those machines, facilities, and personnel by rule. To ensure compliance,
LEO must inspect radiation machines at intervals it considers necessary or appropriate, including follow-up inspections of machines found to be out of compliance. In developing its rules, LEO must do both of the following:• Incorporate by reference the standards it determines apply to mammography, including those under the federal Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992 and its rules that exist when the bill takes effect. If those standards are revised after the bill is enacted, LEO must develop rules to incorporate the revision by reference.
• Specify in the rules the minimum training and performance standards for an individual using a radiation machine for mammography.
The bill removes fees related to compliance evaluations for non-accredited radiation machines used for mammography, and it changes other fees to their inflation-adjusted amounts for fiscal year 2024-25, as shown in the table below. Beginning October 1, 2026, these fee amounts will be adjusted for annual inflation based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Detroit Warren-Dearborn area.
Finally, the bill repeals sections 13524 and 13531 of the code. Section 13524 now requires patient notification of a mammogram demonstrating dense breast tissue.3 Section 13531 now requires the appointment of a radiation advisory board.
The bill takes effect March 24, 2026.
Unspoken in the HFA analysis are two instructive facts.
After countless trees, days of patient anxiety, and hours of clinical follow-up were expended in its wake, this bill ends 11 years of Michigan law requiring "dense breast tissue" reports.
Yet it began with legislative high hopes for "protecting women" and probably even "reducing breast cancer."
Note the rigid standard set by the law and spelled out in state regulation.
Public Act 517 of 2014 was signed into law on January 10, 2015 and will be effective on June 1, 2015. The Act requires mammography facilities to provide certain information to a patient whose mammogram demonstrates heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breast tissue. The information must be in the written lay summary to the patient and include the following information:
"Your mammogram shows that your breast tissue is dense. Dense breast tissue is very common and is not abnormal. However, dense breast tissue can make it harder to find cancer through a mammogram. Also, dense breast tissue may increase your risk for breast cancer. This information about the result of your mammogram is given to you to raise your awareness. Use this information to discuss with your health care provider whether other supplemental tests in addition to your mammogram may be appropriate for you, based on your individual risk. A report of your results was sent to your ordering physician. If you are self-referred, a report of your results was sent to you in addition to this summary."
Beginning with mammography inspections performed on or after June 1, 2015, section inspectors will ask to see evidence of compliance with this requirement.
Discussion
Public Act 517 of 2014 requires that mammography providers give the above notification to patients that have been determined by the interpreting physician as having dense breasts. The paragraph above will need to be included in the lay summary of the mammography results. This summary is currently required to be sent to the patient by Rule 657 of the Ionizing Radiation Rules which adopts the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) (42 USC 263b) regulation for medical records and mammography reports. The information about dense breast tissue must be quoted verbatim.Any time a lay summary is provided to a patient with dense breasts, it will need to include the dense breast notification required by Act 517. The Radiation Safety Section's enforcement of the lay summary requirement will adhere to guidance issued by the FDA.
The requirements of Act 517 do not apply to radiography of the breast performed during invasive interventions for localization or biopsy procedures.
Updated March 24, 2015
This is the very opposite of individual healthcare.
However, it gets worse. Before freedom fans rejoice too gleefully at Michigan's regulatory cut, check out what the feds did in the interim.
Important Information: Final Rule to Amend the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA)
The FDA issued a final rule on March 10, 2023, to amend the MQSA regulations (“2023 MQSA Final Rule”). Enforcement of the MQSA regulations as amended by the 2023 MQSA Final Rule began on September 10, 2024. Facilities subject to the MQSA, must now comply with all applicable requirements, including the breast density notification.
Access the 2023 MQSA Final Rule in its entirety at Federal Register: Mammography Quality Standards Act.
MQSA Inspections
During a facility’s annual MQSA inspection, inspectors will review documentation that relates to whether the facility is meeting the requirements of the MQSA. As of September 10, 2024, the MQSA regulations have certain additional requirements, including:
Mammography Reports
Name and location of the facility performing the exam, (at a minimum the city, State, ZIP code, and telephone number).
An overall final assessment of findings, classified into one of the following categories:Negative
Benign
Probably Benign
Suspicious
Highly Suggestive of Malignancy
Known Biopsy-Proven MalignancyPost-Procedure Mammogram for Marker Placement.
In cases where no final assessment category can be assigned due to incomplete work-up, the report should indicate:
Incomplete: Need additional imaging evaluation
Incomplete: Need prior mammograms for comparison.
An overall assessment of breast density, classified in one of the following categories:
"The breasts are almost entirely fatty."
"There are scattered areas of fibroglandular density."
"The breasts are heterogeneously dense, which may obscure small masses."
"The breasts are extremely dense, which lowers the sensitivity of mammography."Patient Lay Summaries
The patient's name, and the name, address, and telephone number of the facility performing the exam.
Depending on whether the patient's breast density is dense or not dense, as indicated by the mammography report, the patient lay summary must include one of the following notification statements:
Not dense: "Breast tissue can be either dense or not dense. Dense tissue makes it harder to find breast cancer on a mammogram and also raises the risk of developing breast cancer. Your breast tissue is not dense. Talk to your healthcare provider about breast density, risks for breast cancer, and your individual situation."
Dense: "Breast tissue can be either dense or not dense. Dense tissue makes it harder to find breast cancer on a mammogram and also raises the risk of developing breast cancer. Your breast tissue is dense. In some people with dense tissue, other imaging tests in addition to a mammogram may help find cancers. Talk to your healthcare provider about breast density, risks for breast cancer, and your individual situation."Communication of Results
When the exam has a final assessment category of "Suspicious" or "Highly Suggestive of Malignancy," the mammography report is provided to the health care provider and the patient lay summary is provided to the patient within 7 calendar days of the date the mammogram was interpreted. When the exam has an assessment of "Incomplete: Need prior mammograms for comparison," the facility issued a follow-up report with a final overall assessment within 30 calendar days of the initial report, regardless of whether comparison views are obtained.
Medical Outcomes Audit
The annual medical outcomes audit includes the positive predictive value, cancer detection rate, and recall rate for each interpreting physician as well as for the facility as a whole.
Additional Information About the MQSA Final Rule
This information is not an exhaustive list of everything contained in the 2023 MQSA Final Rule. As always, facilities are required to comply with all mammography requirements applicable to them under the MQSA and its implementing regulations. Below is an overview and/or excerpts of some of the additional requirements of the 2023 MQSA Final Rule. It is important to note that the FDA may take enforcement action for noncompliance with the MQSA regulations, whether observed during an annual inspection or determined by other means.
Accreditation Failures
If a facility has failed to become accredited after three consecutive attempts, no accreditation body must accept an application for accreditation from the facility for a period of 1 year from the date of the most recent accreditation failure.
(21 CFR 900.4(a)(6)(ii))
Equipment
All devices used in mammography must have met the applicable FDA premarket authorization requirements for medical devices of that type with that intended use. (21 CFR 900.12(b)(2)(i))
Personnel Records
To comply, facilities must:
Maintain records of training and experience
Ensure records are relevant to their qualification under MQSA
Include records for personnel working or who have worked at the facility as:
Interpreting physicians
Radiologic technologists
Medical physicists
Records must be available for review by MQSA inspectors.Records of personnel no longer employed by the facility must be maintained for no less than 24 months from the date of the departure of the employee, and these records must be available for review at the time of any annual inspection occurring during those 24 months.
The facility must provide copies of these personnel records to current interpreting physicians, radiologic technologists, and medical physicists upon their request.
Facilities must provide personnel records to former employees if the former employees communicate their request within 24 months of the date of their departure.
(21 CFR 900.12(a)(4))
Recordkeeping
Facilities must maintain the original mammograms and mammography reports in a permanent medical record of the patient for the longest of the following:
a period of not less than 5 years,
a period of not less than 10 years if no additional mammograms of the patient are performed at the facility, or
a period, if longer, mandated by State or local law.
Facilities must implement policies and procedures to minimize the possibility of loss of these records. The original mammograms must be retained in retrievable form in the mammographic modality in which they were produced. They cannot be produced by copying or digitizing hardcopy originals.(21 CFR 900.12I(4)(i))
Transfer of Records or Release of Copies
Transfers of mammograms and mammography reports, or release of copies, must take place within 15 calendar days of the facility receiving the request. For digital mammograms or digital breast tomosynthesis, if the examination is being transferred or released for final interpretation purposes, the facility must be able to provide the recipient with original digital images electronically. Additionally, before a facility closes or ceases to provide mammography services, it must make arrangements for access by patients and healthcare providers to their mammographic records. The facility must notify its accreditation body and certification agency in writing of the arrangements it has made and must make reasonable efforts to notify all affected patients.
(21 CFR 900.12(c)(4)(ii), (iii), (v))
Facility Responsibility to Self-Referred Patients
Each facility that accepts patients who do not have a healthcare provider must maintain a system for referring such patients to a healthcare provider when clinically indicated, which must include when such patients' mammogram assessment is either probably benign, suspicious, or highly suggestive of malignancy.
(21 CFR 900.12(c)(2)(ii))
That's right! Even more standardized language is in place for the entire country.
Forget facility competition for excellence. We're farther than ever from individual, relationship-based care.
Get MHF Insights
News and tips for your healthcare freedom.
We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.
























