- Hiring, pay and restructuring: 4 HR leaders on difficult workforce decisions
- First free dental clinic opens in New Jersey
- The week in hospital M&A
- 5 dental insurance changes dentists need to know from the past 15 days
- A new medical school is opening nearby. What do health systems do first?
- ‘Snowbirds’ and ‘med-à-terres’: The market behaviors shaping systems’ growth decisions
- Indiana dental office manager sentenced to 36 months in prison for Medicaid fraud
- OpenAI says new ChatGPT model tops physician-written health answers
- CMS’ accreditation overhaul: What it means for hospitals
- Eli Lilly begins denying 340B discounts
- 5 cardiology leaders building the ASC ownership model
- What it actually takes to launch cardiac ablations in an ASC
- 5 federal, state legislative updates affecting the dental workforce
- Ebola cases jump 38% in 1 week: 5 things to know
- 34 recent hospital, health system executive moves
- Hospitals and health systems moving to new EHR platforms
- How many dentists the largest DSOs support
- 8 new behavioral health projects to know
- Anesthesia has a usage problem not a workforce shortage, leaders say
- Remain or Reimagine: Free Interactive Tool Shows Dentists the value of remaining independent vs partnering with Elevate
- Pennsylvania dental group settles patient coverage lawsuit for $1M
- Pennsylvania physicians push back on consolidation with first-ever independent practice summit
- The ASC procedure list is growing — here’s what’s still missing
- wRVU pay, hospital subsidies don’t constitute Stark law fraud, court rules
- Specialty dentists’ compensation has climbed 39% since 2019
- ASCs’ block time hoarding problem
- Oregon prosecutors urge state to fix mental health system
- Arkansas lab pays $30M to settle kickback allegations tied to gastroenterology practices
- The case for layering behavioral healthcare models
- Why dentistry needs a revamp
- Rural, independent Kansas hospitals launch clinically integrated network
- Nova Southeastern launches 1st anesthesiologist assistant program in Nevada
- 12 behavioral health services, facility closures | 2026
- Higher, short-acting opioid doses linked to 8% lower discharge risk: 4 notes
- Cardiologists push back on CMS’ proposed pay policy changes
- 14,700 bottles of antidepressant recalled over impurity concerns
- FTC orders Aurobindo to divest 4 drugs to complete $250M Lannett acquisition
- Congressional Budget Office calls for more research on No Surprises Act unintended impacts
- 7 DSOs making headlines
- HHS opens applications for $700M in mental health, addiction funding, with $96M for new STREETS program
- Ebola Infections Climb, Could Take Year To Contain, Health Officials Say
- How Northwell is using paramedics to close behavioral healthcare gaps
- Feeling Sleepy During the Day? It Could Be a Warning Sign for High Blood Pressure
- FTC, states sue transgender health association over 'misleading' gender care guidance
- Healthcare organizations still struggle to operationalize AI at scale: Arcadia survey
- Pfizer hunts for new CFO as Denton prepares to hang up gloves, wave goodbye to pharma
- Major League Pitchers Might Avoid Elbow Injuries By Altering Their Approach, Simulation Suggests
- Birth Control Pills Might Increase Binge Eating Risk, Study Finds
- Women Might Lower Their Heart Risk By Lifting Weights, Study Says
- Personalized Brain Implant Provides Step-By-Step Walking Boost For Parkinson's Patients
- Amid industry’s cell therapy automation push, Cellares and Ori dominate the field: report
- Most Americans Are Surviving Cancer. But The Mental Health Challenges Can Persist.
- Listen to the Latest ‘KFF Health News Minute’
- Arrests of Immigrant Parents Create Mental Health Crisis for Children
- Readers Curse Medical Debt and Defend Spelling Therapy
- Sandwiched Between Caring for Kids and Aging Parents? Reach Out for Resources
- Novo's success with oral Wegovy has been fueled by 'familiarity': Spherix
- 20 new behavioral health study findings to know
- 31 behavioral health executive moves to know
- Centerstone names COO
- One Medical Seniors reports data breach of third-party vendor impacting 'limited' number of patients
- A look at Epic's long-term play to build tech for operations, starting with scheduling
- U.K. Moves To Ban Social Media For Children
- Pregnant Woman Exposed to 45 Common Chemicals, Study Finds
- OhioHealth reaches settlement with DOJ, Ohio AG on antitrust lawsuit
- 4 years after snub, GSK partnership helps Spero get Utebzi across FDA finish line
- Despite 'decent' data, Verastem rethinks options for approved oncology combo in pancreatic cancer
- OIG report raises red flags about maternal health 'ghost networks' in Medicaid managed care
- Lantern, Marathon Health team up to launch integrated care management model
- Novo Nordisk opens Czech plant and unveils $29M upgrade to China facility
- Whoop, HealthEx partner to connect members’ medical records and biometric data
- GSK runs first DTC ad for would-be asthma blockbuster Exdensur
- Novo security breach claimed by hacking groups seeking multi-million-dollar ransoms: reports
- After FDA sign-off, Colorado's drug import plan faces tough road ahead
- Lower Risk Of Death, Clots Among Autoimmune Patients Taking GLP-1 Drugs
- Surgical Menopause Tied To Worse Sexual And Urinary Symptoms
- Post-Op Delirium Common In Seniors, But Not All Hospitals Screen For It
- Nortiva purrs into action with long-acting Lynx platform salvaged from Langer startup
- Why one life insurer is going big on health incentives
- Weekly Rundown: Lumeris adds symptom-checking tool to AI platform; DeepIntent rolls out agentic AI tool for healthcare marketers
- Early-Onset Cancers Are On The Rise. Knowing Your Family History Is Crucial.
- Minimally Invasive Procedure Eases Arthritis Knee Pain, Study Finds
- Tennessee Pharmacies Sell Potent Ivermectin, Led by Anti-Vaccine Doctor Who’s Taken ‘Bucketloads’
- More Americans Are Surviving Cancer. But the Mental Health Challenges Can Persist.
- Democrats Seek To Spotlight Rising Health Costs by Forcing Vote on Trump Regulation
- Health services deal value holds steady in 2026 with higher bar for investment: PwC
- CMS tightens oversight of accreditation organizations, limits fee-based consulting
- MedPAC offers a look at enrollment hiccups for Medicare beneficiaries
- CDC, FDA Tackle New World Screwworm, Including Drug Authorization
- 'Biopharma ecosystem is back to full health,' fueled by M&A: PwC
- Lifestyle Changes Can Reduce Your Risk For Multiple Chronic Diseases
- US telehealth utilization climbs 10.1% in Q1, led by mental health visits: Fair Health
- FDA, UK drug regulator deepen transatlantic ties with new liaison program
- People Walk, Exercise Less After Starting Ozempic, Zepbound
- Family Finances Shape Children’s Brain Development, Study Finds
- At-Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Reduces Risk of Heart Attack, Stroke
- Moderna hires Novartis vet to lead commercial, upsizes role for Hoge as potential launches loom
- Uncovr secures $7M in seed funding for AI surgical documentation platform
- Long-Awaited Rule Aims To Boost ACA Choices While Embracing Higher Deductibles
- Many Men Are Prescribed Testosterone Without Proper Testing
- Backed by Threat of Clawbacks, Feds Wield Tight Grip on $50B Rural Health Fund
- Early-Onset Cancers Are on the Rise. Knowing Your Family History Is Crucial.
- Stealth BioTherapeutics removes cloak to become Mighty
- Recipharm channels ‘multi-million-dollar' US manufacturing upgrade, targeting domestic biologics demand
- DeepIntent gives Helix an AI twist to help marketers query data
- PhRMA talks up the power of ‘Medicines First’ in new campaign
- Centene offering staff buyouts as it navigates murky ACA waters
- KFF: Insurer participation in the ACA marketplaces declined from 2025 to 2026
- Organic Baby Formula Recalled Following Botulism Cases
- Germany backs off plan to install variable discount pricing on drugs: report
- Judge tosses multiple provisions of CMS' 2025 ACA program integrity rule
- FDA Approves First Over-the-Counter Glucose Monitor for Children, The Stelo Glucose Biosensor System
- You've Won The Game
- IQVIA taps AI to put overlooked prescribers on marketers’ maps
- Many Patients Stop And Restart GLP-1 Meds, Study Finds
- Merck's Welireg-Keytruda pairing sticks the landing in adjuvant kidney cancer treatment with new FDA nod
- Sanofi, once on FDA course for speedy approval, gains late expansion for Tzield
- Half Of U.S. Parents Track Their Adult Children’s Location
- Taking GLP-1s While On BP Meds May Up Your Risk Of Dizzy Spells, Fainting
- Trust In CDC Plummets Under Trump Administration, New Poll Shows
- Fentanyl Users Take Daily Doses 60 Times The Lethal Level
- Final Rules For Medicaid Work Requirements Are Out. Here's What You Need To Know.
- Long-Awaited Rule Aims To Boost ACA Choices While Embracing Higher Deductibles
- Remarks to the US-CEE Connection: Transatlantic Challenges in Law, Business & Policy
- Influencers, Booze And Teens: What's Showing Up In Their Feeds?
- Health 'War Room,' Digital Tools Are Tracking Disease Risks During World Cup
- Food Labels and Restrictions Can Lower Childhood Obesity Rates, Study Finds
- Tourette Patients Face High Suicide Risk, Pain And Discrimination
- Have A Risk-Taking Teen? This Brain Chemical Might Be Responsible, Researchers Say
- Sepsis, Lung Infection Patients See No Benefit From Remote Monitoring
- Overlooked Social Connections Can Prevent Suicide
- Statement Regarding Minimum Pricing Increments and Access Fee Caps
- Vitamin C May Be Key To A Healthier Brain As You Age
- New Vaccine Schedule Released By American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists
- Statement at the SEC Open Meeting on the Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
- Disorder Protection Rule: Statement on the Proposed Amendments to Rule 611 and Other Provisions of Regulation NMS
- Statement on the Proposed Amendments to Regulation NMS
- Can Fasting Treat Gum Disease? Study Finds Reduced Inflammation
- This Old House: Improving and Remodeling Our Registered Offering and Filer Status Regimes
- How lab data powers precision commercialization to drive therapy adoption
- Peirce Out: Remarks at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Capital Markets Summit
- Medtronic Advances Hugo Robotic Surgery Platform with Key FDA Filings and Product Approvals
- Medtronic Posts Strongest Revenue Growth in a Decade, Driven by Cardiovascular and Surgical Businesses
- Boston Scientific Plans Indiana Distribution Center, 300 New Jobs
- “Harmonization: We’ll Have Lots to Talk About”
- Remarks at the Investor Advisory Committee Meeting
- A Quarter for Your Thoughts: Remarks at the Meeting of the SEC Investor Advisory Committee
- Remarks at the Investor Advisory Committee Meeting
- Base Case: Remarks at the IC3 Blockchain Camp
- Eli Lilly cuts 340B discounts for hospitals resisting its claims data submission policy
Michigan healthcare freedom community forum
Michigan set a record low in 2025 for bills signed into law. For a state that already has 77,944 regulations (2024), fewer new laws is a good thing. if nothing else, it makes it easier for citizens to keep up.
However, as you'll see below, the new mammogram law's implications have escaped the media.
From WLNS Lansing, whose video within the link is a must-see.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/michigan-produced-record-low-number-004531976.html
Michigan produced a record low number of new laws in 2025Brad LaPlante | January 2, 2026
LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — Michigan lawmakers signed into law a record low number of bills in 2025 as the state faces low elementary reading scores, high unemployment and uncertainty in several major job sectors.
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, signed 74 new public acts in 2025, significantly less than the state’s recent average of 383.
With the House controlled by Republicans and the Senate controlled by Democrats, Michigan spent most of the year grappling with a near-state government shutdown that culminated in an eleventh-hour bipartisan budget deal after several missed deadlines.
Despite low production, House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Township) told reporters the Legislature had “the best year” of the seven years Whitmer has been governor. Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks (D-Grand Rapids) did not feel the same, saying, “I have a lot to say about this year,” in a floor speech to close the year.
Hall views the low level of production as a positive and vows to enact even fewer laws next year. Brinks told reporters it’s “strange that he is so proud of not doing his job.” House Majority Floor Leader Bryan Posthumus (R-Cannon Township) said on social media that passing fewer bills is a “feature of good government.”
Absent from the Legislature’s final agenda of the year was a jobs-creation package that was promised by Whitmer, Hall, and Brinks. Hall said he was “committed” to the legislation on Off the Record in December, but a package has not yet come to fruition.
In February, a significant economic and labor policy compromise raised the minimum wage on an accelerated path, albeit at a slower pace for tipped workers, and established paid sick leave. The deal avoided the court-ordered upheaval after a Michigan Supreme Court ruling.
When the budget was finally approved for the new fiscal year, the Legislature approved a new 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, with revenue earmarked for roads. The industry immediately sued, arguing that the tax sidestepped the 2018 voter framework, but a judge allowed it to proceed pending appeal. That tax went into effect on Jan. 1, 2026.
Hall’s goal next year is to develop policy for the state’s next governor, who Michigan will elect in November. In addition, every seat in the Legislature will be on the ballot.
Michigan’s Legislature isn’t the only legislative body with lower production; President Donald Trump signed 70 bills from Congress last year despite Republicans controlling both chambers and the presidency.
HFA summarizes mammogram machine deregulation and slightly reduced fees of Senate Bill 136, which become Public Act 63 of 2025.
https://legislature.mi.gov/documents/2025-2026/billanalysis/House/pdf/2025-HLA-0136-MRYXBQ50.pdf
Senate Bill 136 amends the Public Health Code to eliminate certain existing statutory requirements for the use of radiation machines for mammography and to require the Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity (LEO) to develop and issue rules to provide those standards and requirements. The bill also eliminates a requirement that a patient be notified of a mammogram showing dense breast tissue and provisions requiring the governor to appoint a radiation advisory board.
The code has several provisions related to the use of radiation machines for mammography. Generally speaking, they currently require radiation machines used for mammography to be registered with LEO and specifically authorized for use for mammography; provide standards
a radiation machine, facility, and personnel must meet to be authorized; require inspection and certification of the machines at least annually; and allow LEO to issue rules to implement those provisions.The bill retains the registration requirements described above, but removes the authorization and annual inspection provisions, as well as the prescribed standards, and instead requires LEO to issue standards for those machines, facilities, and personnel by rule. To ensure compliance,
LEO must inspect radiation machines at intervals it considers necessary or appropriate, including follow-up inspections of machines found to be out of compliance. In developing its rules, LEO must do both of the following:• Incorporate by reference the standards it determines apply to mammography, including those under the federal Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992 and its rules that exist when the bill takes effect. If those standards are revised after the bill is enacted, LEO must develop rules to incorporate the revision by reference.
• Specify in the rules the minimum training and performance standards for an individual using a radiation machine for mammography.
The bill removes fees related to compliance evaluations for non-accredited radiation machines used for mammography, and it changes other fees to their inflation-adjusted amounts for fiscal year 2024-25, as shown in the table below. Beginning October 1, 2026, these fee amounts will be adjusted for annual inflation based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the Detroit Warren-Dearborn area.
Finally, the bill repeals sections 13524 and 13531 of the code. Section 13524 now requires patient notification of a mammogram demonstrating dense breast tissue.3 Section 13531 now requires the appointment of a radiation advisory board.
The bill takes effect March 24, 2026.
Unspoken in the HFA analysis are two instructive facts.
After countless trees, days of patient anxiety, and hours of clinical follow-up were expended in its wake, this bill ends 11 years of Michigan law requiring "dense breast tissue" reports.
Yet it began with legislative high hopes for "protecting women" and probably even "reducing breast cancer."
Note the rigid standard set by the law and spelled out in state regulation.
Public Act 517 of 2014 was signed into law on January 10, 2015 and will be effective on June 1, 2015. The Act requires mammography facilities to provide certain information to a patient whose mammogram demonstrates heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breast tissue. The information must be in the written lay summary to the patient and include the following information:
"Your mammogram shows that your breast tissue is dense. Dense breast tissue is very common and is not abnormal. However, dense breast tissue can make it harder to find cancer through a mammogram. Also, dense breast tissue may increase your risk for breast cancer. This information about the result of your mammogram is given to you to raise your awareness. Use this information to discuss with your health care provider whether other supplemental tests in addition to your mammogram may be appropriate for you, based on your individual risk. A report of your results was sent to your ordering physician. If you are self-referred, a report of your results was sent to you in addition to this summary."
Beginning with mammography inspections performed on or after June 1, 2015, section inspectors will ask to see evidence of compliance with this requirement.
Discussion
Public Act 517 of 2014 requires that mammography providers give the above notification to patients that have been determined by the interpreting physician as having dense breasts. The paragraph above will need to be included in the lay summary of the mammography results. This summary is currently required to be sent to the patient by Rule 657 of the Ionizing Radiation Rules which adopts the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) (42 USC 263b) regulation for medical records and mammography reports. The information about dense breast tissue must be quoted verbatim.Any time a lay summary is provided to a patient with dense breasts, it will need to include the dense breast notification required by Act 517. The Radiation Safety Section's enforcement of the lay summary requirement will adhere to guidance issued by the FDA.
The requirements of Act 517 do not apply to radiography of the breast performed during invasive interventions for localization or biopsy procedures.
Updated March 24, 2015
This is the very opposite of individual healthcare.
However, it gets worse. Before freedom fans rejoice too gleefully at Michigan's regulatory cut, check out what the feds did in the interim.
Important Information: Final Rule to Amend the Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA)
The FDA issued a final rule on March 10, 2023, to amend the MQSA regulations (“2023 MQSA Final Rule”). Enforcement of the MQSA regulations as amended by the 2023 MQSA Final Rule began on September 10, 2024. Facilities subject to the MQSA, must now comply with all applicable requirements, including the breast density notification.
Access the 2023 MQSA Final Rule in its entirety at Federal Register: Mammography Quality Standards Act.
MQSA Inspections
During a facility’s annual MQSA inspection, inspectors will review documentation that relates to whether the facility is meeting the requirements of the MQSA. As of September 10, 2024, the MQSA regulations have certain additional requirements, including:
Mammography Reports
Name and location of the facility performing the exam, (at a minimum the city, State, ZIP code, and telephone number).
An overall final assessment of findings, classified into one of the following categories:Negative
Benign
Probably Benign
Suspicious
Highly Suggestive of Malignancy
Known Biopsy-Proven MalignancyPost-Procedure Mammogram for Marker Placement.
In cases where no final assessment category can be assigned due to incomplete work-up, the report should indicate:
Incomplete: Need additional imaging evaluation
Incomplete: Need prior mammograms for comparison.
An overall assessment of breast density, classified in one of the following categories:
"The breasts are almost entirely fatty."
"There are scattered areas of fibroglandular density."
"The breasts are heterogeneously dense, which may obscure small masses."
"The breasts are extremely dense, which lowers the sensitivity of mammography."Patient Lay Summaries
The patient's name, and the name, address, and telephone number of the facility performing the exam.
Depending on whether the patient's breast density is dense or not dense, as indicated by the mammography report, the patient lay summary must include one of the following notification statements:
Not dense: "Breast tissue can be either dense or not dense. Dense tissue makes it harder to find breast cancer on a mammogram and also raises the risk of developing breast cancer. Your breast tissue is not dense. Talk to your healthcare provider about breast density, risks for breast cancer, and your individual situation."
Dense: "Breast tissue can be either dense or not dense. Dense tissue makes it harder to find breast cancer on a mammogram and also raises the risk of developing breast cancer. Your breast tissue is dense. In some people with dense tissue, other imaging tests in addition to a mammogram may help find cancers. Talk to your healthcare provider about breast density, risks for breast cancer, and your individual situation."Communication of Results
When the exam has a final assessment category of "Suspicious" or "Highly Suggestive of Malignancy," the mammography report is provided to the health care provider and the patient lay summary is provided to the patient within 7 calendar days of the date the mammogram was interpreted. When the exam has an assessment of "Incomplete: Need prior mammograms for comparison," the facility issued a follow-up report with a final overall assessment within 30 calendar days of the initial report, regardless of whether comparison views are obtained.
Medical Outcomes Audit
The annual medical outcomes audit includes the positive predictive value, cancer detection rate, and recall rate for each interpreting physician as well as for the facility as a whole.
Additional Information About the MQSA Final Rule
This information is not an exhaustive list of everything contained in the 2023 MQSA Final Rule. As always, facilities are required to comply with all mammography requirements applicable to them under the MQSA and its implementing regulations. Below is an overview and/or excerpts of some of the additional requirements of the 2023 MQSA Final Rule. It is important to note that the FDA may take enforcement action for noncompliance with the MQSA regulations, whether observed during an annual inspection or determined by other means.
Accreditation Failures
If a facility has failed to become accredited after three consecutive attempts, no accreditation body must accept an application for accreditation from the facility for a period of 1 year from the date of the most recent accreditation failure.
(21 CFR 900.4(a)(6)(ii))
Equipment
All devices used in mammography must have met the applicable FDA premarket authorization requirements for medical devices of that type with that intended use. (21 CFR 900.12(b)(2)(i))
Personnel Records
To comply, facilities must:
Maintain records of training and experience
Ensure records are relevant to their qualification under MQSA
Include records for personnel working or who have worked at the facility as:
Interpreting physicians
Radiologic technologists
Medical physicists
Records must be available for review by MQSA inspectors.Records of personnel no longer employed by the facility must be maintained for no less than 24 months from the date of the departure of the employee, and these records must be available for review at the time of any annual inspection occurring during those 24 months.
The facility must provide copies of these personnel records to current interpreting physicians, radiologic technologists, and medical physicists upon their request.
Facilities must provide personnel records to former employees if the former employees communicate their request within 24 months of the date of their departure.
(21 CFR 900.12(a)(4))
Recordkeeping
Facilities must maintain the original mammograms and mammography reports in a permanent medical record of the patient for the longest of the following:
a period of not less than 5 years,
a period of not less than 10 years if no additional mammograms of the patient are performed at the facility, or
a period, if longer, mandated by State or local law.
Facilities must implement policies and procedures to minimize the possibility of loss of these records. The original mammograms must be retained in retrievable form in the mammographic modality in which they were produced. They cannot be produced by copying or digitizing hardcopy originals.(21 CFR 900.12I(4)(i))
Transfer of Records or Release of Copies
Transfers of mammograms and mammography reports, or release of copies, must take place within 15 calendar days of the facility receiving the request. For digital mammograms or digital breast tomosynthesis, if the examination is being transferred or released for final interpretation purposes, the facility must be able to provide the recipient with original digital images electronically. Additionally, before a facility closes or ceases to provide mammography services, it must make arrangements for access by patients and healthcare providers to their mammographic records. The facility must notify its accreditation body and certification agency in writing of the arrangements it has made and must make reasonable efforts to notify all affected patients.
(21 CFR 900.12(c)(4)(ii), (iii), (v))
Facility Responsibility to Self-Referred Patients
Each facility that accepts patients who do not have a healthcare provider must maintain a system for referring such patients to a healthcare provider when clinically indicated, which must include when such patients' mammogram assessment is either probably benign, suspicious, or highly suggestive of malignancy.
(21 CFR 900.12(c)(2)(ii))
That's right! Even more standardized language is in place for the entire country.
Forget facility competition for excellence. We're farther than ever from individual, relationship-based care.
Get MHF Insights
News and tips for your healthcare freedom.
We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.






















