- Aspen Dental targets fast-growing Georgia city for new practice
- Michael Dowling: Now is not the time to abandon gun safety efforts
- A new wording test on ‘Medicare for All’
- UCI Health started as 1 hospital. 50 years and 6 hospitals later, CEO charts its future
- Virtua Health names president of 2 New Jersey hospitals
- Colorado wildfires send dozens to UCHealth hospitals
- Northwell appoints chair of surgery
- How 5 health systems are avoiding a repeat of the 2023 chemo shortage
- Nashville General taps CEO
- NewYork-Presbyterian rolls out OpenEvidence AI across its network
- Oswego Health expands surgery, orthopedic services New York
- Vanderbilt professor elected 40th president of bariatric group
- The ASC tax squeeze is gaining momentum
- The private equity race regulators haven’t caught up to
- Weill Cornell taps new chair of surgery, surgeon-in-chief
- The state-by-state battle over anesthesia time caps
- What happens to ASC contracts when a payer gets absorbed
- What will make or break the future of DSO success
- Dentistry reaches inflection point with AI
- Former UPMC cardiologist drops lawsuit over CEO’s device company ties
- Dental assistant pay vs. cost of living by state
- South Carolina cites behavioral health facility over missing correction plan
- Former Mayo Clinic research director sues system over alleged retaliation for raising AI practice concerns
- Senators urge Defense Department to expand autism therapy coverage under Tricare
- GI consolidation’s new era: 5 deals to know
- The GI procedure cuts in CMS’ pay proposal: 5 things to know
- ‘The economics just don’t work’: CMS’ ACCESS model draws scrutiny
- Washington restricts spit hood use in state psychiatric facilities
- Memorial Hermann Health Plan winds down commercial coverage
- Remarks at the Society for Corporate Governance Conference
- Maryland health system receives $10M gift to construct ASC
- 1-800-Dentist faces class-action lawsuit over data breach
- Staten Island hospital debuts mobile behavioral health program for youth
- CVS' Omnicare unit agrees to $440M settlement with DOJ in ongoing fraud case
- GLP-1 Use Hits Record High As Medicare Opens Access To Weight-Loss Drugs
- Founder of telehealth startup Done sentenced to six years in prison for Adderall fraud scheme
- HHS calls on hospitals to sign 'Make Hospital Food Healthier Pledge'
- Foundation Fights Medical Errors That Claim 200,000 U.S. Lives A Year
- Former exec alleges Alignment Healthcare leaders juiced profits to boost bonuses
- In compensation push, HHS gears up to draft COVID vaccine injury table
- AZ, Ionis shares tumble on ATTR-CM trial flop, but analyst flags over-reaction
- Frazier Healthcare Partners to acquire MatrixCare in $490M deal
- New, Highly Accurate Brush Test Can Detect Mouth Cancer Within An Hour
- Innovative Hip Replacement Cuts Post-Surgery Risk Of Dislocation By 70%
- Global Study Finds Kids Worldwide Skipping Fruits And Vegetables
- Ipsen’s Botox rival Dysport charts new horizons with dual phase 3 wins in migraine
- Affordable Care Act Insurers Want More Premium Increases As Enrollment Sags
- My Search for a Psychiatric Bed in an Overburdened Health System
- Dr. Reddy's presses pause on generic semaglutide supply after flagging API issue
- OpenEvidence launches medical AI copilot feature that grades medical evidence and unveils NewYork-Presbyterian collaboration
- Novo Nordisk asks public to ‘Meet Me in the Middle’ in new obesity experience installation
- BioNTech plots right-sized HER2 ADC launch to ‘build the muscle’ for BMS-partnered bispecific
- Telehealth ex-CEO sentenced in Adderall fraud case: 5 things to know
- Oklahoma awards 4 behavioral health clinic contracts
- The key to patient trust in dentistry
- Good news, bad news for the dental workforce
- 7 behavioral health layoffs to know | 2026
- 200+ dentists making headlines halfway through 2026
- How students are paying for dental school
- Health tech startup Forus inks partnership with GI medical society to improve medication access
- U of Kentucky dental dean receives top educator award
- UnitedHealthcare unveils Lifestyle Spending Accounts for employer plans
- FDA hits Lundbeck with untitled letter over efficacy claims on migraine drug Vyepti
- Sanofi floats flu shot marketing pledges to pacify EU antitrust probe
- 36 behavioral health executive moves to know
- Delaware establishes statewide opioid treatment guidance for EDs
- Tampa General Hospital sues Eli Lilly over pulled 340B discounts
- Viz.ai expands neurodegenerative disease care in new partnership with Cortechs.ai
- E. Coli Outbreak Prompts Recall Of Frozen Blueberries At Publix
- Drinking Coffee May Lower Your Risk of Liver Disease
- FDA halts release of new drug rejection letters while working to formalize policy
- Mass General Brigham nurses, home care clinicians launch largest healthcare strike in state history
- ACA plans set for another year of premium spikes, preliminary filings show
- AI wearables company Vilo launches Signal OS ahead of upcoming smart ring launch
- CureDuchenne lights the candles with DMD public service campaign highlighting birthdays
- Zimmer Biomet to Hire 500 in India as New Bengaluru Technology Centre Drives AI and MedTech Innovation
- Foreign drugmaker caught faking doctors’ petition to evade China’s price cut scheme
- AdaptHealth Investigates Data Breach After Social Engineering Attack, Possible Link to ShinyHunters Emerges
- Keenova gets on the good foot with Xiaflex trial win in rare tissue growth condition
- Evonik plugs $100M into Indiana drug substance plant as US CDMO demand mounts
- Rumination Plays Key Role In Caregiver Stress, Study Says
- U.S. Teens Underestimate Risks Of Fentanyl Use, Survey Finds
- Men More Likely To Be Diagnosed With Advanced Cancer
- Primary care’s AI moment
- Copay Assistance Is Meant To Defray Patient Drug Costs. Some Insurers Keep It Instead.
- Training Program Could Ward Off Injuries Among Soccer Girls
- Affordable Care Act Insurers Want More Premium Increases as Enrollment Sags
- Patients Face a Thicket of Red Tape Trying To Maintain Consistent Health Coverage
- Leo Cancer Care secures $65M to advance upright radiotherapy system as company preps for IPO
- Catalent sells UK facility to Codis, expands Nanoscope partnership
- Allergan Aesthetics helps map paths for young women in STEM with Girls Inc. event
- Nonprofit-private equity joint ventures worth scrutiny, PESP report says
- Lenz Therapeutics rolls out telehealth offering for Vizz prescription eye drops
- American Heart Association joins social network Roon for medical research collaboration
- Independent pharmacies hit Prime Therapeutics with antitrust suit over alleged price fixing
- Thousands of Medicare Beneficiaries Thought Their Drug Plan Was Free. Then They Lost It.
- Michigan, Other States See Unusual Spike In Parasite That Causes 'Explosive' Diarrhea
- Statement on the 2026 Regulatory Agenda
- GLP-1 'Secret Shopper' Study Finds Gaps in Online Prescribing
- Applying Agentic AI to Healthcare Delivery: The Key to True Transformation
- From Compliance to Clinical Action: Fixing the Broken Loop in Post-Market Surveillance
- Novartis dismisses 322 more staffers based out of US headquarters
- Bristol lays out KRAS med Krazati's stumble in confirmatory colorectal cancer trial
- Fatty Liver Boosts Odds Of More Deadly Colon Cancer, Study Says
- Weight Loss Surgery Increases Risk Of Alcoholism, Study Says
- IV Vitamin C Might Boost Recuperation Among Trauma Patients
- These Church Members Disagree On Politics. Together They're Wiping Out Medical Debt.
- Exercise Can Ward Off Nicotine Fits, Help Smokers Quit
- Thousands of Medicare Beneficiaries Thought Their Drug Plan Was Free. Then They Lost It.
- Copay Assistance Is Meant To Defray Patient Drug Costs. Some Insurers Keep It Instead.
- On heels of Bain buyout, Tanabe inks deal to sell manufacturing unit and 17 drugs to Towa
- FDA approves Vera’s dual-target Trutakna, setting up IgAN market battle with Novartis, Otsuka
- Vertex, in its largest-ever deal, acquires endocrine disease specialist Crinetics for $10B
- Real Chemistry snaps up Spurwing Communications, launches new Asia Pacific hub
- Skin quality driving widespread quality-of-life issues: survey
- AI care partner Heidi puts a spin on pharma ad tropes in new campaign to relieve 'side effects'
- Nonprofit hospitals are embracing high-risk, high-reward investment portfolios. Is that a problem?
- New California Law Replaces 'Sell By' Labels On Food Packaging
- Study Raises New Questions About Artificial Sweeteners
- Teladoc Health inks multi-year virtual care deal with National Basketball Players Association
- FDA deepens Vertex's Casgevy label, opening treatment for patients as young as 2
- Calling Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Something Else Might Save More Lives, Researchers Argue
- Taking Small Breaks From Sitting Around Can Lower Your Cancer Risk
- Learning Languages Could Net You A Younger Brain, Study Says
- New Disease Threats Follow Trump Administration's Health Program Cuts
- New Medicaid Work Rule Means More Opportunities To Lose Coverage
- In California Governor’s Race, Voters Face Stark Choice on Immigrant Healthcare
- Epic plans to expand 4 executives' roles as President Sumit Rana exits the company
- Journalists Discuss Healthcare Costs’ Political Fallout, Concerns About Canceled ICE Facility
- FDA Lets 20 ZYN Nicotine Pouches Claim Lower Risk Than Cigarettes; Critics Warn Of Danger
- Ultra-Processed Foods Linked To Brain Differences In Young Children
- Prompt Responses From Mom Might Lower A Baby's Risk Of Childhood Mental Health Problems
- Rehab Program Helps Lift Long COVID 'Brain Fog'
- Why Are You Right- Or Left-Handed? Experiments Suggest Surprisingly Simple Explanation
- Rural Americans More Likely To View Cancer As A Death Sentence, Poll Finds
- He Dreamed Of Becoming A Physician Assistant. New Loan Rules May Thwart Him.
- HealthQ Special: Caregiving in the Sandwich Generation
- A Mom Said Infant Formula Killed Her Baby. The Manufacturer Closed the File.
- FDA Scientists Warn Against Expanded Peptide Access As Kennedy Reshapes Advisory Panel
- Regulatory tracker: AbbVie, Genmab's blood cancer bispecific expands label in EU
- Can A Popular Muscle Supplement Help Treat Depression?
- Melatonin Shows Promise As Safe, Cheap Painkiller, Review Concludes
- Heat Dome Coming: Tips To Stay Safe During Extreme Temps
- Diets That Lower Inflammation Might Cut Dementia Risk, Study Indicates
- Vitamins Might Be Key To Asthma Control In Children, Adults
- Remarks at the Economic Club of New York
- Is Your Organization Ready to Govern AI in Regulatory Affairs?
- CMS Proposes TAVR Medicare Coverage is Potential Boost for Edwards Lifesciences
- Remarks to the US-CEE Connection: Transatlantic Challenges in Law, Business & Policy
- Statement Regarding Minimum Pricing Increments and Access Fee Caps
Michigan healthcare freedom community forum
Governor Whitmer is getting a lot of press for signing Michigan's $ 57 / $ 82 billion FY 2024 budget yesterday. It is touted as public health centered. One of those public health expenditures is ending new immigrants' 5 year waiting period for public health insurance mandated by Title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. MDHHS will absorb the full cost of providing public health insurance programs to these immigrants:
In Michigan, immigrants have to wait years for public health insurance. That’s about to change.
By: Anna Gustafson - July 31, 2023A few years ago, Susan Reed, the director of the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, was working with an immigrant family who had a child with Type 1 diabetes.
The family was struggling. They were navigating life in an entirely new country and were trying to access health care for their child while uninsured. No matter where they turned, they faced barrier after barrier. Devastated, they were told: You have to wait. You and your child won’t be able to receive public health insurance for another five years.
“You can imagine the anguish of being in a new country, having a child with a chronic condition and knocking on every door and being told to wait five years,” said Reed, whose organization provides legal resources to immigrants across Michigan. “A child with juvenile diabetes cannot wait five years.”
The reason the family had to wait five years to receive public health insurance – which includes Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and covers about one-third of Michiganders – is rooted in the so-called “welfare reform” legislation that was passed by a Republican-led Congress and signed into law by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1996.
The “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996” – which was sponsored by former U.S. Rep. John Kasich (R-Ohio) – made sweeping changes to the country’s safety net. The legislation undid a welfare structure that had been created as part of the New Deal in 1935 and permitted low-income parents to access federal cash with no limits on how long those payments could continue.
You can imagine the anguish of being in a new country, having a child with a chronic condition and knocking on every door and being told to wait five years. A child with juvenile diabetes cannot wait five years.
– Susan Reed, director of the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center
As part of the changes enacted in 1996, it became federal law that legal non-citizens – immigrants who are living in the U.S. with documentation but are not yet citizens – would have to reside in the country for five years before being able to access a variety of public assistance programs, including Medicaid, CHIP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).
In 2009, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Reauthorization Act gave states the option to waive that five-year waiting period for Medicaid and CHIP for children up to 21 years old and pregnant people.
Now, 14 years after the law was enacted, Michigan’s Fiscal Year 2024 budget – which was passed by the state’s Democratic-led House and Senate last month – is poised to eliminate the requirement that non-citizen children and pregnant individuals must live in the country for five years before being able to access Medicaid and CHIP.
The omnibus general government budget, which is expected to soon be signed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, includes about $26.4 million to implement this change. Once the policy goes into effect, there will be 14 states remaining with the five-year waiting requirement for Medicaid and CHIP.
Whitmer’s budget proposed in February included $32.1 million to implement the change, which was reduced to $26.4 million due to the state House and Senate agreeing on a change in the allocation of federal funds. The $26.4 million for this policy change includes about $20 million in federal funds and $6.4 million from the state’s General Fund.
When asked to comment on the Medicaid policy change, Whitmer spokesperson Stacey LaRouche wrote in a statement to the Advance that the governor “has a robust record of supporting women at each stage of life and ensuring all Michiganders have access to quality, affordable healthcare is central to her mission.
“Prioritizing the health and well-being of every Michigander ensures our state has a strong and healthy workforce and attracts workers and businesses to our state,” LaRouche continued. “That’s why the governor has focused on expanding reproductive care for women, including funding her Healthy Moms, Healthy Babies initiative, which aims to reduce the disproportionate racial impacts of maternal and infant mortality and improve care. Governor Whitmer will always support women at each stage of their life and will continue to make sure that Michigan remains a place where a woman’s ability to make her own medical decisions with her trusted health care provider is respected.”
Eliminating the five-year period is expected to impact about 4,000 children and thousands of pregnant people in Michigan, said Simon Marshall-Shah, a senior policy analyst with the Michigan League for Public Policy (MLPP). The MLPP has for years advocated for the state to end its five-year wait for public health insurance.
“We’re really excited to see this made it fully through,” Marshall-Shah said. “It will reduce the rate of uninsured among non-citizens.
“These are children and families and adults who have lived in our country for years and are otherwise income eligible [for Medicaid],” he continued.
In Michigan, 10.6% of immigrants in the state are uninsured, compared to 5% of Michiganders born in the United States. Among that 10.6%, more than 70% are non-citizens, according to data from the MLPP.
Since the 1996 law went into effect, immigrants in Michigan and across the country have had to use federally qualified health centers and “cobble together charity care” to access health services, Reed said. Often, immigrants would have to take on “massive medical bills” because they were unable to access health insurance, Reed said. Prior to 1996, immigrants with documentation did not have to wait to access Medicaid or other public benefits programs like food assistance.
“The complicated way that being a non-citizen affects eligibility for public programs and benefits is something that’s not well understood by the public,” Reed said. “If you’re a green card holder, who does it benefit to leave people without primary care? It’s a tremendously impractical policy.”
But this policy has meant that, for decades now, immigrant children and families have not been accessing the care that they need – which, Marshall-Shah said, can lead to more serious health diagnoses and significant financial strain.
“Children are postponing well visit checks; they’re not getting conditions diagnosed because they’re not going to the doctor,” Marshall-Shah said. “For adults, it means only seeing a doctor if there’s an acute care need.
“People who are able to get their health care needs met early will be treated earlier, diseases won’t progress, and they won’t have to utilize the emergency room, which is very expensive,” he continued.
Additionally, accessing care at emergency rooms is not sustainable when it comes to addressing health needs, Reed noted.
“You can’t go to an emergency room and get insulin every day,” Reed said.
Though the impending change regarding the five-year waiting period is “really important” for thousands of Michigan families, it’s “also short of the changes we’d like to see,” Reed said.
“We want to get all people covered in Michigan,” Reed explained.
The 2009 law permits states to waive the five-year waiting period for Medicaid for children up to the age of 21 and pregnant people, but it does not allow them to eliminate the requirement for other adults.
At the federal level, there are attempts to expand access to public benefits for non-citizens. This year, U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and U.S. Sen. Mazi Hirono (D-Hawaii) introduced the LIFT the BAR Act, which would restore access to such programs as Medicaid and SNAP for all legal residents, including people with green cards, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, and others. The bills – H.R. 4170 and S.2038 – were introduced in June and remain in committee.
While the policy change in Michigan doesn’t cover all legally residing Michiganders, it is welcome news, Reed emphasized.
“We want new immigrant families to thrive,” Reed said. “Anything we can do to make access to something as basic as health care – both primary care and more complicated levels of care – for kids who are just starting their new lives in the U.S. is something we should do.”
It also begins to rectify federal policies rooted in “the desire to divest in families and children of color,” which is in part why the 1996 welfare reform legislation passed, Reed said.
Still, Reed added, much more needs to be done to address racism within the country’s immigration system.
“We still live in an environment where the narrative that immigrants are getting things that others are not getting is generally being stoked,” Reed said. “Our presidential politics and national conversation is still very basic about who’s taking and who’s deserving and it’s just not reality-based when it comes to what immigrants contribute.”
The Michigan Immigrant Rights Center helps people apply for citizenship along with the Michigan Immigrant and Labor Law Association and the University of Michigan International Center. | Photo courtesy of MIRC
Marshall-Shah said the Medicaid change in Michigan will help to further racial equity in a state where Hispanic and Latino children are more likely to be uninsured than other racial and ethnic groups. With the policy change, more Hispanic and Latino children will be able to receive health insurance, Marshall-Shah pointed out.Both Marshall-Shah and Reed noted that this policy change will likely retain and draw families – something that will help to address the population decline that Michigan has experienced in recent years.
“We’re talking about how to increase population here in Michigan,” Marshall-Shah said, adding that policies like eliminating the Medicaid wait “make it so families know they can access what they need here, that policies are not as restrictive as they used to be, that kids can thrive here, and families can get the care and coverage they need.”
Right now, Reed said Michigan is losing out on people coming to the state specifically because of the five-year wait for health insurance.
“I frequently get calls from colleagues; they want to bring their husband’s parents from Canada and want to know, how do they get health care?” Reed said. “And it’s like, hmm, they better drive back to Canada.”
How is this sustainable?
This administration doesn't believe in "Grow your own" for anything.
Not jobs, not babies, and not the next generation of healthcare. Just put the state in charge, and import everything.
This Newsmax opinion piece offers a balancing perspective.
The author is a Canadian physician transplanted to the US.
Due to technical limits of the Forum, I've excluded an audio track available at the link.
https://www.newsmax.com/sallypipes/uninsured-health-insurance/2023/11/27/id/1143762/
Is US Uninsured Crisis a Myth?
Monday, 27 November 2023 11:06 AM EST
Progressives like Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., routinely claim that the United States is in the midst of an uninsured crisis. Just last month, the Vermont socialist lamented, "We have 85 million Americans who are uninsured or under-insured."But as a recent report from the Congressional Budget Office shows, this national emergency exists mostly in Sanders's imagination.
The report estimates that 24.3 million Americans lack health insurance in 2023, which amounts to just over 7% of the country.
That might seem like an uncomfortably large figure. But consider another crucial fact. The overwhelming majority of uninsured residents — over 20 million — either have access to some form of subsidized health coverage or are in the country illegally.
Add it all up, and uninsured legal American residents who lack access to subsidized coverage account for just over 1% of the population.
The real problem with American health care isn't that too many people can't secure insurance. It's that Democrats have made insurance so unattractive that huge segments of the country would rather go uninsured than avail themselves of even heavily subsidized coverage.
The current uninsured population breaks down into several distinct groups.
First, consider the 10.8 million Americans who are eligible for some form of subsidized health insurance but have failed to sign up for a plan. Of these, 5.3 million have access to subsidized employee-sponsored coverage, 4.4 million qualify for subsidies through the Obamacare exchanges, while 1.1 million are eligible for Medicare Part B.
Why would someone willfully forgo such coverage options? The most obvious answer is that they don't think it's worth the cost.
In the case of employer-sponsored coverage, the average employee contribution to a family plan in 2023 was $6,575 over the course of the year. For those who don't expect their annual health costs to exceed that figure — particularly younger, healthier patients — spending that much on premiums could seem excessive.
It's also striking that millions of uninsured Americans are eligible for subsidized coverage on the Obamacare exchanges.
The 2010 health law sent the price of individual coverage soaring, largely due to its distortionary insurance market regulations, which took effect in the 2014 plan year and effectively outlawed bare-bones, low-cost insurance. But increasingly generous federal subsidies have insulated most patients from the true cost of these plans.
Most recently, the August 2022 Inflation Reduction Act ensured that no individual — not even the very wealthy — would have to pay more than 8.5% of his or her income for exchange coverage through 2025.
Even with such generous government assistance, 4.4 million people would rather go uninsured than settle for what's sold on the Obamacare marketplaces.
The lesson to draw from these findings is clear. What Americans want and need isn't gold-plated health coverage that's subsidized by the government. It's genuinely affordable insurance that's tailored to their unique healthcare requirements — the very sort of product that Obamacare deliberately removed from the market.
The 4.3 million uninsured Americans who are eligible for Medicaid tell a different story altogether. They have access to coverage at essentially no personal cost.
It's true that some of them might not know they're eligible. But many others simply haven't bothered to sign up. And given how subpar the care is, combined with the difficulty in finding a doctor who will take Medicaid, that might be a rational decision.
The most rigorous analysis of Medicaid's health effects ever conducted shows why. The study compared patients randomly selected for an expansion of Medicaid in Oregon against a similar group of uninsured patients.
The researchers found that, when measured against the uninsured control group, "Medicaid coverage generated no significant improvements in measured physical health outcomes" for enrolled patients after two years.
In other words, the evidence suggests that enrolling in Medicaid is no better than remaining uninsured. And patients can always get treatment, even routine care, in an emergency room if necessary. That's one of the reasons why the cost of uncompensated care at hospitals is so high.
America doesn't suffer from an uninsured crisis. It suffers from a lack of coverage patients want, need and are able to afford. And that very real crisis has been made far worse by years of costly, ineffective Democratic reforms. Rather than obsessing about an imaginary problem, policymakers should get to work solving the one we actually have.
Sally C. Pipes is president, CEO, and the Thomas W. Smith fellow in healthcare policy at the Pacific Research Institute. Her latest book is "False Premise, False Promise: The Disastrous Reality of Medicare for All," (Encounter Books 2020).
Get MHF Insights
News and tips for your healthcare freedom.
We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.
























