Michigan healthcare freedom community forum

Notifications
Clear all

The Decline In Religion And The Mental Health Crisis

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
672 Views
10x25mm
(@10x25mm)
Famed Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1781
Topic starter  

The mental health of Americans, especially young Americans, has declined in lock step with the decline in religiosity:

https://www.aei.org/op-eds/to-address-the-mental-health-crisis-tackle-the-decline-in-religion/

To Address the Mental Health Crisis, Tackle the Decline in Religion
By Naomi Schaefer Riley | Michelle Shain
June 24, 2025

Americans are searching for an answer to the youth mental health crisis. While many experts rightfully scrutinize smartphones and social media as culprits, another profound shift deserves our attention: the dramatic retreat from religion in American life. As religious participation plummets, particularly among young people, we’re losing the profound social and psychological benefits once provided by religious communities. And our rapidly secularizing society has failed to offer compelling alternatives to replace religion’s protective effects on mental health.

Thousands of studies have shown that religious people are happier, more confident, more optimistic, and more satisfied with their lives. They are also less likely to suffer from anxiety or depression, commit suicide, or abuse alcohol or other drugs. While correlation doesn’t prove causation, longitudinal studies show that many people who become more religious subsequently show improved mental health. Yet the percent of Americans reporting no religious affiliation skyrocketed from just 5% in 1972 to almost 30% today, according to the Pew Research Center. Among the youngest U.S. adults, those ages 18-29, fully 44% are religiously unaffiliated.

Research identifies four distinct pathways through which religious involvement protects mental health — protection that many young Americans are now missing.

First, religion supports healthy families. Religious communities typically promote family stability, encourage parental involvement, and endorse values that strengthen family bonds. Practices such as attending worship services together create shared experiences and traditions that unite family members across generations. Rituals like Shabbat dinners for Jewish families or Family Home Evening for Latter-day Saints create sacred time for connection and conversation. The family structures and practices encouraged by religious participation create environments where children and adolescents are more likely to thrive emotionally and psychologically. As religious participation declines, we lose this institutional support for healthy family functioning.

Second, religion offers community and social support. Religious congregations provide connections that combat isolation and loneliness. Do not underestimate the power of studying together, singing together, and snacking together. The relationships formed during these activities provide a sense of belonging, as well as a place to give and receive help and advice.

Third, religion facilitates volunteerism and civic engagement. Religious institutions create structured opportunities for young people to contribute to their communities, develop empathy, and experience the psychological benefits of helping others. Religious teachings that emphasize service to others motivate prosocial behavior that benefits both the recipients and the volunteers themselves.

Fourth, religion helps people find meaning and purpose. Religious teachings address existential questions and help believers find purpose, direction, and an understanding of their place in the universe. In a world where social media teaches us to measure ourselves through views and likes, religion offers alternative metrics of value and worth. This sense of meaning serves as a powerful buffer against depression and helps youth develop resilience in the face of life’s challenges.

As religious participation declines, many young people are losing access to these protective factors. Regardless of how we feel about God and faith, neither triumphalism nor handwringing will solve the problem. Religious communities should continue reaching out to families with children, extolling the benefits of organized religion to parents in particular.

But we must also recognize that as one system of support fades, we need to develop alternatives intentionally.

We need programs that strengthen family bonds and teach parenting skills to replace religion’s family support function. Community organizations must create the social connections that religious congregations once offered. Schools and civic groups should expand service-learning and volunteerism programs to replace the structured helping opportunities religious institutions traditionally provided. And we need new frameworks that help young people find meaning and purpose in an increasingly secular world.

Restricting social media use and limiting screen time might help the teenage mental health crisis, but we need to do much more. We must build new structures that provide family support, community connection, opportunities for service, and pathways to meaning. We must fill the protective gap left by religion’s retreat.

This essay is adapted from a chapter in the edited volume Mind the Children: How to Think About the Youth Mental Health Collapse.



   
ReplyQuote
Abigail Nobel
(@mhf)
Member Admin
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 1415
 

The rise in Marxist "critical pedegogy" completes this picture, I think. Besides being bad for mental health, it would eliminate conscience rights and all forms of healthcare freedom.

AIG's extensive footnotes are worth perusing at the link. Omitted here for length.

https://answersingenesis.org/public-school/education-in-america/opium-of-the-pupils-marxist-education/

The Opium of the Pupils: How a Marxist False Gospel Is Undermining Education

Patricia Engler   |    July 31, 2026

For years, public education systems have been discipling young people to believe a destructive false gospel. This reality helps explain why youth we know and love may seem to be learning less about reading, math, and science than about activism, sexuality, and liberal ideology. Here’s a quick breakdown of what’s going on and what we can do about it.

Giving Students Extra Marx
Through an approach known as “critical pedagogy,” schools are teaching students to think and act like modern Marxists.1 This approach has been pervading mainstream education, as a 2015 article in the Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies reveals:

After several decades of existing on the educational fringe, it is safe to say that critical pedagogy has entered the mainstream in the United States. . . . Academic conferences such as the American Educational Research Association regularly feature hundreds of sessions related to critical pedagogy and there are special interest groups solely devoted to scholarship in the field. Critical pedagogy and its left-centrist derivative social justice is also applied to previously untouched contexts, from teaching math to physical education. Social justice has even been incorporated into business and sustainability degree programs, including the concept of servant leadership.2
In other words, schools are teaching students to view every subject through a Marxist lens. The authors, in fact, expressed concern that schools are still not anti-capitalistic enough, calling for “a Marxian reclamation of critical pedagogy” in response.3 The goal of such teaching is for students to live out a Marxist worldview by becoming activists who will break down the current social order and build a new one. The article positively quotes a book that states this objective openly:

This revolutionary pedagogy takes as its ultimate goal the socialist reconfiguration of capitalist society taking special care to avoid past mistakes, such as any element of Stalinist authoritarianism, prescriptions or attacks on freedom.4
Put differently, the purpose is to raise up modern communists. As the Party for Socialism and Liberation in the USA clarifies, “Socialism is the necessary stage between capitalism and communism.”5 Importantly, the resulting society would not base its laws on God’s Word, as these points from the Party’s vision for the future reveal:

Abortion services will be available free and on demand. . . .
All forms of bigotry, discrimination or the promotion of hatred against lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender and queer people, or against anyone on the basis of their sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, will be eliminated, including in marriage rights, employment, housing, adoption and health care. . . .
No law or measure will give preference in word or in deed that favors heterosexual relationships, or the nuclear family form, over other relationships.
There will be a sustained public education campaign promoting the goals of multinational working-class unity and international solidarity, the advancement of women’s rights, the promotion of respect of sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression, as well as exposing the evils of racism,6 sexism, anti-LGBTQ bigotry, xenophobia, and bigotry based on ability or national chauvinism. . . . .7
Clearly, biblical views on the family will not be tolerated. So when push comes to shove, faithful Christians who uphold God’s Word as their highest authority will also not be tolerated. Notably, such attacks on a biblical view of the family have long been part of socialist agendas—and of their dark spiritual roots, as this article unpacks.

This is the kind of society today’s schools are building. To see how, let’s look more closely at the worldview that critical pedagogy instills.

What They’re Really Learning
Critical pedagogy teaches students to view the world as a battleground between two warring sides: the oppressors and the oppressed. According to this thinking, for instance, most European settlers are oppressors, and most other people groups are oppressed. Men are oppressors, while women are oppressed. Christians who accept God’s Word on sexuality are oppressors, while people who identify as LGBTQ are oppressed. Humans (especially capitalists) are oppressors, while the environment is oppressed.8

This is not a biblical view, which condemns oppression in terms of sinful actions and attitudes against others.9 Instead, this view tends to prejudge people as guilty of being oppressors based on their group identity, regardless of their behaviors or character.

According to such thinking, oppressors enjoy all the power in society. Institutions that keep society stable—including the church, government, and family—serve as instruments of oppression. The only solution is to break down society through revolution and build a new social order.

To accomplish this, the oppressed need to take away power from the oppressors, committing a type of cultural revolution in the name of “social justice.” Redefining justice goes along with redefining good and evil.10 Virtually anything that disempowers oppressors—potentially even by violence, looting, or vandalism—may be seen as “good.”11 And virtually anything that keeps oppressors in power—including, supposedly, the nuclear family—is seen as “evil.”12

Clearly, these views do not come from God’s Word.

They come, directly or indirectly, from Marxism.

Karl Marx taught that humanity’s problems stem not from sin but from socioeconomic conditions. These conditions created an inherently oppressive society, culminating in a wealthy class exploiting a working class. What did Marx propose as the only solution to redeem humanity from this problem? Revolution. The world’s workers must overthrow their oppressors and create a communist society, where government, religion, family, and private property will eventually disappear.

Ultimately, Marxism is a false gospel, where a false savior redeems us from a false original problem to usher in a false heaven on earth. And false gospels always lead to real consequences.

Marxism: The Opium of the Pupils
We can expect to see more of these consequences as more students reach voting age. Meanwhile, one consequence we’re already observing is the undermining of education.

Effectively, the focus is less on teaching math than on discipling modern Marxists.
Traditionally, education involves teaching skills that will help students think, speak, and function for themselves within stable, free societies. But Marxists don’t want to further stabilize society. They want to revolutionize it. If reading, writing, and math sustain oppressive societies, then schools’ primary purpose should not be to teach these skills (beyond the extent to which they’ll support Marxist-related causes). Instead, the purpose should be to train revolutionary activists.13

As an example of how this mindset plays out in real classrooms, consider the highly funded curriculum known as “Equitable Math.” The curriculum might sound great at first—until a closer look reveals what it really says. It tells teachers to “re-envision” the “purpose of math education,” to “challenge the ways that math is used to uphold capitalist, imperialist, and racist14 views,” and to teach students to “use math as resistance.”15 Effectively, the focus is less on teaching math than on discipling modern Marxists.

Another example comes from a 2023 article that, leaning on Marxist-based educational approaches, calls for using the topic of climate change to transform students into activists. The authors declare, “Educators should develop a critical pedagogy where community change and political activism are the core.”16 Activism is to become the core of education—in the name of climate change.

To the extent that activism has displaced academics, we shouldn’t be surprised to see changes in students’ thinking abilities. (Incidentally, the less students can think for themselves, the better they’ll be at following the community guidelines of the new society. Students may also feel less inclined to think and speak for themselves when they can download their thoughts and words from AI chatbots—many of which appear to have left-wing political biases.17)

These trends point to a grim irony. Where Karl Marx once called religion “the opium of the people,”18 Marxism now looks suspiciously like a mind-numbing opium of the pupils.

What Can We Do?
The antidote to lies is the truth. And the basis for truth is God’s Word. All education is worldview education. So the most important response for Christian parents is to make sure their children are truly learning from a biblical worldview foundation. Beware though: Not all Christian schools and curricula present a biblical worldview. Faith-based schools may merely add Bible verses onto secular programs, like cherries on a poisoned sundae.19

Along with promoting genuinely biblical education, here are a few other ideas for how parents, pastors, and everyday Christians can respond to Marxist training in schools:

Start by strengthening your own personal foundations to keep and live out a biblical worldview. These include spiritual foundations (a close walk with God fueled by Scripture, worship, and prayer), intellectual foundations (apologetics knowledge and critical thinking skills), and interpersonal foundations (a strong Christian community, including a biblical local church).
Find opportunities to mentor young people, to help them build these same foundations.
Learn more about the Marxist worldview students are learning and how it opposes God’s Word, so you can better coach young people to recognize and resist it.
Teach (and model) the skills young people need to think and speak for themselves. One way is to share biblical critical thinking resources with students from ministries like Answers in Genesis.
Raise awareness among parents and church leaders, even simply by sharing resources that reveal how a Marxist false gospel is influencing youth.
Pray for students, educators, and education systems that young people would hear truth instead of lies.
Share the true gospel, which alone has the power to change hearts in ways that counter genuine oppression and injustices.

Summing Up
Other resources like Modern Marxism provide a much more detailed breakdown of these issues and of how Christians can respond. But this overview offers a glimpse of how thoroughly mainstream education systems have become modern Marxist discipleship centers. These centers displace the focus of education from academics to activism, for the stated goal of ushering in a new social order that will not tolerate faithful Christians. In response, Christians must be at least as intentional about discipling the next generation as modern Marxists are.



   
ReplyQuote
Q

Get MHF Insights

News and tips for your healthcare freedom.

We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.

 

Name(Required)
Zip Code(Required)
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Sponsors

J & DE Family Charitable Fund

Friends
of MHF

Kelly Grotendiek

Philip Harbach

Dale Johnson

Drs. Jeffrey and Joni Jones

Vickie Kahle

Tammy Kipen

Marlin & Kathy Klumpp

Melanie Kurdys

Ruth Nobel

Patrick Peterson

Stephanie Poortenga

Jeanne Smit

Ben and Hope Staal

John Tuinstra

Jacki VanHuis

Sandy Walker

Sign Up for MHF Insights to keep up on the latest in Michigan Health Policy

Name(Required)
Zip Code(Required)
This field is hidden when viewing the form

5 great non profit logos 2021 - 2025
Michigan Healthcare Freedom Candid

Click here to join the MHF Community Forum!

Grow the community on our social media pages.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial