- 5 state behavioral health policy updates
- Oregon’s anti-consolidation bill tested by physician contract switch-up
- Mass General Brigham, Dana-Farber to coordinate on split: Boston Globe
- How AI-enabled early detection is redefining preventive care
- Medical device maker Stryker hit with cyberattack
- New York university to launch dental school
- Aetna to pay $118M to resolve Medicare Advantage upcoding allegations
- Fraud lawsuits against Erlanger can proceed, judge rules
- Medical debt linked to deferred dental care: Study
- FDA launches single adverse event platform
- Riverside Health taps new system finance leader, hospital president
- Medicare beneficiaries may pay more amid insurer acquisitions of PBMs: Study
- Medicare beneficiaries may pay more amid insurer acquisitions of PBMs: Study
- Virginia Mason Franciscan exec heads to Providence
- IU Health bets on ‘big, one-time endeavors’ for the future
- IU Health bets on ‘big, one-time endeavors’ for the future
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist taps hospital president
- ADHA targets professional autonomy in new strategic plan: 5 notes
- Duke University Health System files CON for $6.4M ASC
- Ohio dental practice to permanently close
- 3 health systems outsourcing RCM functions
- A flurry of noncompete updates in Q1
- Specialty1 Partners continues 2026 growth with new joint venture
- The CMS loophole shrinking ASC access: Inside ASCA advocacy
- CMS imposes equipment supplier moratorium; 3 sentenced to prison in fraud cases
- Guidelight names chief growth officer
- ‘A delta in opportunity’: The savings independent ASCs are leaving on the table
- Despite insurers' expense pains, Tenet Healthcare is securing healthy commercial rates through 2027
- Nebraska Medicine’s $99.3M center to expand behavioral health services
- FDA approves 1st treatment for cerebral folate deficiency tied to autistic features
- 8 health system rating downgrades
- The looming impact of site-neutral payments on ASCs
- Dental industry headed for consolidation shift amid DSO financial woes: 4 notes
- Why this anesthesia leader says stipends are here to stay
- Northwestern Medicine opens expanded outpatient center
- Meet the ASC industry’s ‘alternative to the traditional MSO’
- University of Minnesota dental clinic closes over financial challenges
- Study Links State Taxes to COVID Lockdown Decisions
- Hospital expenses grew twice as fast as prices in 2025: 4 AHA findings
- Aetna to pay $117.7M to settle Medicare Advantage upcoding allegations: DOJ
- Connecticut fines debt collector $100K for calls to hospital emergency line
- ADA names Dr. Nader Nadershahi as executive director
- Connecticut health system strikes RCM partnership
- Stryker hit by international cyberattack linked to pro-Iran group
- AHA: Hospitals' total expenses rose by 7.5% in 2025
- AstraZeneca recruits Joshua Jackson, Philadelphia Flyers’ Gritty to cancer screening push
- As Lilly flourishes in Q4, peer projections signal looming sector slowdown in 2026
- FDA May Allow Some Flavored Vapes Aimed at Adults
- Dark Sweet Cherries May Help Slow Aggressive Breast Cancer, Mouse Study Suggests
- FDA Approves Leucovorin for Rare Brain Disorder, Not Autism
- Joint Economic Committee report: Medicare Advantage overpayments drive up Part B premiums
- Veeva shells out $100M for Ostro and its AI chat tool for pharma brand engagement
- Lilly beefs up oral GLP-1 capacity with $3B manufacturing pledge in China
- UCB's Bimzelx continues winning streak with victory over AbbVie's Skyrizi
- Lowering Parents' Stress Can Reduce Risk Of Childhood Obesity
- Multilingualism Might Not Aid Brain Aging, Researcher Argues
- 15-Year Study Shows Sharp Rise in Depression Among U.S. College Students
- Repealing Motorcycle Helmet Laws Leads to More Severe Crashes, Millions in Added Treatment Costs
- Why Childhood Cavities May Predict Adult Heart Disease
- Physical Therapy Costs Vary Widely In U.S., Study Finds
- J&J's Joaquin Duato joins $30M CEO pay club with 30% compensation boost for 2025
- Cosmetic Surgery Investigation Prompts Warnings for Patients, and a Push for Tighter Safety Standards
- Primary Care Is in Trouble. So Doctors Band Together To Boost Their Market Power.
- Skyhawk taps Teva alum to steer commercial path, while Santhera names new CCO to grow DMD sales
- Driving the news at HIMSS26: Verily, Samsung ink collaboration; Meditech's latest AI solutions
- Minnesota to give $5M in restitution to patients of shuttered dental office
- Colorado hospitals, advocates launch youth mental health coalition
- Pennsylvania hospital CFO on life after bankruptcy: ‘You’ve got to hold the line’
- Medicare allegedly paid $15M+ for ED services tied to non-ED sites: Report
- Climate warming could increase anxiety, depression: Study
- Sutter Health boosts operating margin to 2.6% in 2025
- Remarks at the Institute of International Bankers 2026 Annual Washington Conference
- Fostering Regulatory Harmony Between the SEC and CFTC
- Only 4 states satisfy over 50% of mental health workforce needs: Report
- Here's where hospital markets are the most concentrated
- A look at how CVS is leaning on 'agentic twins' in developing consumer tech
- Bancos, primera línea de batalla contra los fraudes financieros a adultos mayores
- Inside Grand Mental Health’s tech-enabled crisis response model
- Sandoz to set up standalone biosimilars unit as it eyes upcoming 'golden decade' of patent losses
- Indiana syringe services face ID requirement, restrictions
- AbbVie's Robert Michael earns hefty pay bump to $32.5M in 2nd year as CEO
- NYU Stern report calls for private equity reforms to safeguard quality of care
- Remarks at the International Bar Association’s 24th Annual International Conference on Private Investment Funds
- Raw Oysters and Clams Recalled After Norovirus-Like Illness Outbreak in Washington
- Mammograms May Also Reveal Hidden Heart Disease Risk, Study Finds
- Chile Becomes First Country in the Americas To Eliminate Leprosy
- Going Abroad? CDC Warns Travelers About Polio Risk in Several Countries
- Listen to the Latest ‘KFF Health News Minute’
- The Fierce Healthcare team on the Fierce 15 of 2026
- Más niños llegan a salas de emergencias con dolor de muelas. Los recortes de Trump y la lucha anti flúor de RFK Jr. no ayudan
- Centene's stock falls as CEO London outlines ongoing ACA headwinds
- AI-fueled misdiagnoses, rural care barriers are 2026's top patient safety threats: ECRI
- Patients want price transparency, e-commerce experience from pharma DTP platforms: survey
- Carrum Health teams up with Virta Health on a comprehensive weight loss solution
- Leerink questions whether BioNTech can thrive without their 'founders' insight' as stock drops
- Novo Nordisk's US headquarters under fire in latest FDA warning letter
- Filana leaves Cassava roots behind amid branch into epilepsy
- Nearly Half of U.S. Kids Lack Adequate Sleep, Survey Shows
- Trump Caused Immediate Decrease in Acetaminophen Rx's For Pregnant Women, Study Finds
- Students Spend A Third Of Their School Day On Their Smartphone, Study Says
- Daily Multivitamins Slow Aging, Clinical Trial Finds
- Stress of Pregnancy Complications Might Impact Future Heart Health, Study Says
- Approved IV Drug, Gazvya, Reduces Lupus Symptoms, Clinical Trial Finds
- CSL telegraphs 300 new hires as it breaks ground on $1.5B plasma-based medicine plant near Chicago
- Banks Are Becoming Bulwarks Against Scams for Vulnerable Seniors
- More Kids Are in ERs for Tooth Pain. Trump Cuts and RFK Jr.’s Anti-Fluoride Fight Aren’t Helping.
- FDA approves leucovorin for ultrarare cerebral folate deficiency subset without clinical trial
- BioNTech's CEO, CMO prep departure to set up next-gen mRNA company
- 12 new behavioral health sites to know
- HIMSS26: Samsung, b.well partner to 'kill the clipboard,' aligning with a key CMS goal
- HIMSS26: Epic expands AI roadmap, previews Factory to build and orchestrate AI agents
- A $21M farewell: Emma Walmsley lands nearly 50% pay hike in final year as GSK chief
- Remarks at the 45th Annual Small Business Forum
- Founders, Funders, and Forty-Five Forums: Remarks at the 45th Annual Small Business Forum
- Remarks at the 45th Annual Small Business Forum
- Leapfrog ordered to remove safety grade for 5 Tenet hospitals
- FDA unveils 4th revision of draft guidance for looser biosimilar testing requirements
- 'Fibermaxxing' Trend Encourages People To Eat More Fiber
- Lilly rewards CEO David Ricks with $36.7M pay package for 2025, fueled by GLP-1 success
- That Stressful Person in Your Life Might Be Aging You Faster, Study Finds
- Newsom se enfrenta a Trump y RFK Jr. por la salud pública
- Infant Bath Seats Sold on Amazon Recalled Due To Tipping Hazard
- FDA Vaccine Chief Dr. Vinay Prasad Exiting Role
- Spruce hooks a commercial chief to prep for rare disease launch
- Hims & Hers makes deal with Novo Nordisk as it shifts obesity strategy
- Fierce Healthcare highlights Fierce 15 of 2026 honorees at NYSE
- Universal Health Services to acquire Talkspace in $835M deal to build out virtual behavioral health
- Florida no amplió Medicaid, pero igual algunos legisladores quieren imponer requisitos de trabajo
- Novo and Hims make nice, striking deal to sell Ozempic, Wegovy on Hims' telehealth platform
- Sotyktu, take 2: BMS' first-in-class pill gains FDA nod to treat psoriatic arthritis
- 'SNL' pokes fun at mysteries of Amgen's Otezla for plaque psoriasis
- Weighted Vests Help Keep Bones Strong — But Only If Seniors Stay Active
- Small Drop In Measles Vaccinations Tied to Big Jump In Cases
- UV Air Filters Cut Airborne Asthma Triggers, Study Finds
- Many Seniors Gain Physical, Mental Fitness As They Age, Study Finds
- Common Drug Class, Anticholinergics, Shows Links to Heart Risk — Are You Taking One?
- Illicit Drugs Raise Stroke Risk, Even for Younger Adults
- Florida Hasn’t Expanded Medicaid. Lawmakers Want To Add Work Requirements Anyway.
- Omada Health swings to a profit in Q4, offers new GLP-1 cash-pay option for employers
- Most Americans Say They Don’t Trust Driverless Cars — Here’s Why
- Can The Critters in Your Mouth Cause or Cure Disease?
- KFF: A look at Part D enrollment trends for 2026
- Healthcare Dealmakers—Hims & Hers goes international with Eucalyptus purchase, Humana's CenterWell buys MaxHealth and more
- Some Patients Keep Weight off With Fewer GLP-1 Injections, Study Finds
- RFK Jr. Urges Medical Schools To Add More Nutrition Training
- Sixth Measles Case Confirmed in New Mexico Jail
- Community Health System selling 4 Arkansas hospitals to Freeman Health System for $112M
- Philips unveils Rembra CT for acute and high-demand imaging environments
- Philips unveils Rembra CT for acute and high-demand imaging environments
- 45,000 Halo Magic Sleepsuits For Babies Recalled Over Choking Risk
Let's start this thread with a quick history of Medicaid prepared by the Center for Health Care Strategies (CHCS):
https://www.chcs.org/media/Medicaid-Timeline-Fact-Sheet_01.14.20v2.pdf
Medicaid: A Brief History of Publicly Financed Health Care in the United StatesFor more than 50 years, Medicaid has played an essential role in the U.S. health care system — now providing health coverage for more than 72 million Americans, including one in three children, more than half of all births in some states, and nearly two-thirds of nursing home residents. Following are key milestones, preceding the Social Security Act Amendments and beyond.
⚫ 1935
Social Security Act
Federal money is made available to states to provide financial assistance to
seniors, which initiates creation of the private nursing home industry.
Enables states to extend and improve services that promote the health of
mothers and children, particularly in rural and economically distressed
areas.
Assists states, counties, health districts, and other political subdivisions of
states in establishing and maintaining adequate public health services,
including the training of personnel for state and local health work.⚫ 1939
Federal Security Agency
Brings all federal programs around health, education, and social security together
under one agency.⚫ 1965
Social Security Amendments: The Birth of Medicaid and Medicare
Medicaid is created, expanding on existing federal support for health care
services for recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children.
Medicare is established with two components: Part A (hospital services)
and Part B (physician services) for people age 65 and older.
From the start, separate funding streams for each program, varying
payment rates, and different coverage rules create conflicting financial
incentives for federal and state governments and providers.⚫ 1967
Social Security Amendments: Covering Individuals with Disabilities and Children
Health insurance for individuals with disabilities increases; previously, one could only
be eligible if disabled at the time of filing the application.
Congress introduces Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT),
which ensures that children under age 21 enrolled in Medicaid receive age appropriate screening, preventive care, and treatment services.⚫ 1972
Medicaid Eligibility for Elderly, Blind, and Disabled Individuals Linked to Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Eligibility
Provides a uniform baseline income for eligibility to Medicaid, in
conjunction with eligibility for SSI.⚫ 1981
Freedom of Choice and Community-Based Care Waivers
States are able to use Medicaid funds to provide an array of non-medical
services (excluding room and board) not otherwise covered by Medicaid if those
services allow recipients to receive care in community and residential settings as an
alternative to institutionalization.
States are required to provide additional payments to hospitals treating a
disproportionate share of low-income patients.⚫ 1982
Arizona: The Last State to Opt into Medicaid and the First with Statewide Managed Care
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System is established, providing
medical services to eligible persons through a managed care system — the
first statewide Medicaid managed care system in the U.S.⚫ 1985
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA)
Provides temporary continuation of group health plan coverage for certain
employees, retirees, and family members at group rates when coverage is lost
under qualifying events.⚫ 1986
Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act
Requires hospital emergency departments to medically screen every patient who
seeks emergency care and to stabilize or transfer those with medical emergencies,
regardless of health insurance status or ability to pay.⚫ 1987
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987: Protections for Nursing Home Residents
Includes new requirements on quality of care, resident assessment, care
planning, and the use of neuroleptic drugs and physical restraints.
Implements mandatory use of a standardized, comprehensive tool, known
as the Resident Assessment Instrument, to assist in assessment and care
planning.⚫ 1989
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989: EPSDT Expansion
Expands EPSDT to ensure that all required screenings, preventive care, and
treatments are covered in every state in response to evidence of limited coverage for
children with mental and developmental disabilities.
The 1905(r)(5) requirement is implemented, including all medically necessary
services for children.⚫ 1989
Medicaid Coverage Expands for Pregnant Women and Young Children
Expands to include pregnant women and children aged under six in families
with an income up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL).
Expands early and periodic screening for anemia, urinary tract, and other
infections in pregnant women.⚫ 1990
Medicaid Further Expands Coverage and Lowers Drug Prices
Medicaid coverage expands to include children ages 6-18 under 100 percent of FPL.
The Medicaid Drug Rebate Program is created, which ensures Medicaid receives the
lowest price available for all prescription drugs.⚫ 1991
Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital Spending Controls
Provider-specific taxes and donations to states are capped.⚫ 1996
Mental Health Parity Act
Large group health plans can no longer impose annual or lifetime dollar
limits on mental health benefits that are less favorable than any such limits
imposed on medical/surgical benefits.
Welfare Link to Medicaid Severed
Aid to Families with Dependent Children is replaced by Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).
Beneficiaries can receive health coverage through Medicaid without
receiving cash assistance.
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act
Women receiving cash assistance through TANF are guaranteed health coverage for
their families, including at least one year of transitional Medicaid when transitioning
from cash assistance to work.⚫ 1997
Balanced Budget Act
Spurs limited growth rates in payments to hospitals and physicians under
fee-for-service arrangements.
Restructures payment methods for rehabilitation hospitals, home health
agencies, skilled nursing facilities, and outpatient service agencies to incent
delivery of more efficient services.
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
Public coverage rates for children in families with income between 100 and
200 percent of FPL increases by 26 percent, and rates for children with income in the
Medicaid range of under 100 percent of FPL increases by 15 percent.
Provides states with enhanced federal financing and greater flexibility in program
design compared to Medicaid.
By fiscal year 2000, every state, territory, and the District of Columbia has children
enrolled in CHIP-financed coverage.⚫ 1999
The Olmstead Decision
The U.S. Supreme Court holds in Olmstead v. Lois Curtis that unjustified
segregation of persons with disabilities constitutes discrimination, and
requires public agencies to provide services in the most appropriate and
least restrictive integrated setting that serves the needs of individuals with
disabilities.
Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act
Amends the Social Security Act to expand health care coverage availability
for working individuals with disabilities.
Allows states to offer buy-in to Medicaid for beneficiaries with disabilities; states are
free to establish their own income and resource standards, including having the
option of no income or asset limits.⚫ 2009
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
Subsidizes $87 billion in matching funds for two years to help states pay for the
additional Medicaid needs that usually occur in a recession.
Allocates $24 billion to cover 65 percent of COBRA premiums for up to nine months
for laid-off workers.⚫ 2010
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)
Adds consumer protections in health coverage, such as guaranteed issue of
health insurance, acknowledgement of pre-existing conditions, no lifetime
limits, and the allowance of young adults to remain on their parents’
insurance until age 26.
Expands access to affordable health coverage via insurance marketplaces,
Advance Premium Tax Credits, Cost Sharing Reduction, and Medicaid
expansion.
States are required to expand Medicaid to childless, able-bodied adults up to 138
percent FPL.
Includes programs related to advancing payment and delivery system reform, such
as the Medicare Shared Savings Program (upon which most Medicaid ACOs are
based) and a Medicaid Health Homes program.⚫ 2011
Community First Choice Option Established Under the ACA
Allows states to provide home- and community-based attendant services
and supports to eligible Medicaid enrollees under their state plan.⚫ 2012
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius: Supreme Court Decision
The U.S. Supreme Court upholds Congress’ power to enact the ACA,
including a requirement for most Americans to have health insurance by 2014.
The court declares mandatory Medicaid expansion unconstitutional. States are given
the option to expand Medicaid eligibility to childless, able-bodied adults up to 138
percent FPL.⚫ 2014
CMS Defines “Home- and Community-Based” for Provision of Medicaid Services
Setting must ensure an individual’s rights of privacy, dignity, and respect,
and freedom from coercion and restraint, and optimize, but not regiment
individual initiative, autonomy, and independence.
ACA Medicaid Expansion and Insurance Marketplaces
Increased eligibility for US residents with household incomes up to 138
percent of FPL who live in an expansion state.
Initial Medicaid expansion states, as of October 2019, include Alaska, Arizona,
Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan,
Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York,
North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Virginia,
Washington, Washington D.C., and West Virginia.⚫ 2018
CMS Approves 1115 Waiver that Includes Work Requirements
CMS approves provisions for the first time that allow linking eligibility to
meeting work requirements for ACA expansion and non-expansion
populations. The provisions also allows states to charge premiums up to
five percent of family income.⚫ The Future…
The Center for Health Care Strategies (CHCS) is a nonprofit policy center dedicated to improving the health of
low-income Americans. It works with state and federal agencies, health plans, providers, and community-based
organizations to develop innovative programs that better serve people with complex and high-cost health care
needs. For more information, visit www.chcs.org
What a mouthful! It's easy to see why Medicaid pervades care and policy.
Their "Future" segment surely includes OBBBA work requirements, plus vociferous industry and bureaucratic objections to all change to the status quo.
MedPage's report on state and industry impact from a recent SCOTUS decision is a case in point. Note the politically-coded use of "disparities," and don't take the title's reference to patients as exclusive concern for the same.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/116376
Supreme Court's Medina Ruling Is a Blow to Medicaid Patients
— The decision limits patients' rights and access to reproductive care
by Suhasini Ravi, JD, MPH, and Sarah Wetter, JD, MPHJuly 3, 2025Just days after the 3-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the court has issued another decision that will exacerbate disparities in access to critical healthcare, including reproductive healthcare, contraception, preventive care, mental health care, and cancer screening.
On June 26, the Court ruled (6-3) in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic that Medicaid beneficiaries have no right to enforce Medicaid's "free choice of provider" provision, and therefore, no right to challenge South Carolina's decision to disqualify Planned Parenthood from the state's Medicaid program. This decision is not the only threat to patients and Planned Parenthood -- Congress also is poised to prohibit federal Medicaid funds from flowing towards Planned Parenthood for 1 year under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
The Medina Ruling
The Medina case stemmed from a 2018 executive order by South Carolina's Governor, Henry McMaster (R), that categorically barred all health facilities and providers that perform abortions from Medicaid reimbursement. Governor McMaster took this step even though a long-standing federal requirement known as the Hyde Amendment prohibits the use of federal Medicaid funds for abortion services except in narrow circumstances.
Two Planned Parenthood clinics and one patient brought a lawsuit arguing that the order violated the Medicaid Act's "free choice of provider" provision, which allows Medicaid beneficiaries to receive care from any qualified and willing provider of their choice. The Supreme Court did not address whether South Carolina violated this provision by disqualifying Planned Parenthood. Rather, the court focused on whether Medicaid beneficiaries have the right to sue government officials who violate this provision under a prominent civil rights law known as Section 1983.
The majority ruled that the "free choice of provider" provision does not confer a federal right to Medicaid beneficiaries to sue over South Carolina's exclusion of Planned Parenthood from the Medicaid program. The court determined that Congress did not use sufficiently "clear and unambiguous rights-creating language" in the "free choice of provider" provision, emphasizing that the word "right" does not appear at all. As a result, patients do not have the right to sue the state under Section 1983. Finding no individual right, the majority noted that Medicaid functions as a contract between the federal and state governments, and the proper remedy for a state's violation of the "free choice of provider" provision is thus for the federal government to withhold the state's Medicaid funding.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, dissented and argued that the "free choice of provider" provision did, in fact, include sufficiently clear rights-creating language to allow patients to sue. The dissent would have affirmed that low-income individuals could sue under Section 1983. The dissent thus describes the majority's decision as part of "the project of stymieing one of the country's great civil rights laws."
What Happens Next?
While dismantling a patient's right to sue a state under the "free choice of provider" provision, the majority pointed to other remedies. The court asserted that the federal government, via the Health and Human Services secretary, has the discretion to enforce the "free choice of provider" provision by withholding Medicaid funding from states in violation of the provision. This enforcement mechanism seems unlikely, especially from the Trump administration.
Planned Parenthood is also able to challenge South Carolina's decision to exclude it from the Medicaid program under state administrative processes as well as in the courts. However, this can be a long, arduous process. And in the meantime, affected Medicaid beneficiaries would lack access to the provider of their choice and the care they need.
How Will Medina Impact Care Nationwide?
The Medina decision will prevent Medicaid beneficiaries in South Carolina -- and other states that are likely to do the same -- from accessing Planned Parenthood as their provider of choice. As was made clear in many amicus briefs, Planned Parenthood provides a range of critical healthcare services. This includes services to improve maternal and child health through contraception and family planning, sexually transmitted infection testing and treatment, cancer screening, and screening for conditions that could ultimately cause infertility and cancer. Under Medina, Medicaid beneficiaries in South Carolina will no longer be able to seek this care at Planned Parenthood -- or, if they do, they will have to pay out of pocket, which many cannot afford.
Finding another trusted provider will not be easy for low-income patients in South Carolina and beyond. As we've noted previously, South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries already face limited choices of providers, with 41 of the state's 46 counties federally designated as Health Professional Shortage Areas. Under Medina, Planned Parenthood's primary care providers may no longer be able to help fill these access gaps for Medicaid beneficiaries -- not because they are unqualified or unwilling, but because South Carolina can exclude them from Medicaid on ideological grounds.
As noted, Medina will pave the way for similar action in other states, likely impacting access to healthcare for millions of Medicaid beneficiaries. Over the past decade, at least 14 states have attempted to disqualify Planned Parenthood from their state Medicaid program.
What will the future hold for Planned Parenthood? Nationwide, nearly half of Planned Parenthood's 2 million patients are covered through publicly funded programs like Medicaid, making Medicaid a major revenue source for the organization. Without additional funding to support Planned Parenthood's services, the court's decision will likely result in significant revenue losses, potentially leading Planned Parenthood to reduce its service areas or close clinics. These risks are even greater if Republicans in Congress succeed in blocking federal Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood for 1 year.
Ultimately, the court's ruling in Medina puts at risk access to a wide range of care, including reproductive healthcare for low-income women and their families -- especially in states where access to this care is already limited because of abortion bans. As Justice Jackson noted in her dissent, this ruling will "strip those South Carolinians -- and countless other Medicaid recipients around the country -- of a deeply personal freedom: the 'ability to decide who treats us at our most vulnerable.'"
Suhasini Ravi, JD, MPH, is a senior associate at the Center for Health Policy and the Law at the O'Neill Institute in Washington, D.C. Sarah Wetter, JD, MPH, is a senior associate with the O'Neill Institute.
An opinion piece by a federally-funded clinic director, also published by MedPage.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/116410
The Worst of Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Be Felt in Rural America
— The law contains far-reaching changes to health policy
July 8, 2025On July 4, President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1). While marketed as a sweeping piece of tax and spending reform, the legislation arguably contains some of the most consequential changes to federal healthcare policy in a generation. It restructures Medicaid. It redefines the role of government in the provision of care. And it may prove to be the most significant shift in U.S. healthcare since the Affordable Care Act.
This time, the headlines looked different. Yes, there was debate -- plenty of it -- but much of it focused on tax cuts and government spending. Many outside the policy world were unaware that the bill encompassed sweeping changes that would affect how care is delivered, accessed, and funded. And now, it's the law.
I'm the Chief Medical Officer of a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that serves five rural counties in Missouri. We offer primary care, ob/gyn, dental, behavioral health, and addiction services to patients who often have nowhere else to go. I spent the weekend reading the bill. I joined a policy call with our state association. I talked to nonprofit partners, pharmacists, and other FQHC leaders.
Here's what I learned.
While some of the most extreme Medicaid restructuring proposals -- like a per-capita cap -- were dropped during negotiations, the final law still delivers significant changes. New provisions either require states to set or give them more flexibility in setting stringent eligibility requirements, tighter enrollment verification, and work requirements. On paper, these are framed as "efficiency measures." But in practice, they will likely result in fewer people maintaining continuous coverage -- especially in rural and underserved communities where paperwork barriers and access gaps are already steep. The impact may not be immediate, but over time, the shift could mean fewer patients covered and more strain on frontline clinics.
The bill doesn't repeal Medicaid expansion outright. But it weakens it substantially. States like Missouri, which expanded coverage only fairly recently (2021) and after a prolonged court battle, may now struggle to sustain it. When the federal match drops or plateaus and enrollment swells, states will face difficult choices: cut benefits, reduce payments, or tighten eligibility.
It also opens the door to future changes in the 340B Drug Pricing Program and Disproportionate Share Hospital payments via increased pressure to control Medicaid spending. These are the programs that help clinics like mine survive. We use 340B savings to offer affordable medications to the uninsured, and to reinvest in behavioral health, obstetrics services, and wraparound care. If that funding disappears, our clinic -- and thousands like it -- will be forced to reduce services, lay off staff, or shut down entirely.
The legislation also adjusts certain federal match rates for Medicaid and limits supplemental payments. The result is that more costs are shifted to states. And many states, already operating under tight budgets, may not be able to absorb that hit. Governors may soon have to review benefit structures, provider payment models, and eligibility criteria.
What the bill doesn't include is just as revealing. There is no meaningful investment in primary care, behavioral health, or maternal health. There's nothing to address the worsening rural health workforce shortage. No mention of value-based care. No plan for tackling the social determinants of health. No recognition of the fact that addiction, suicide, and chronic illness are rising fastest in the very communities this legislation undercuts.
All of this happened despite divisions and pushback from policymakers and health leaders on both sides of the aisle.
What does this mean in the real world? Let me tell you about a patient I saw last week. She's in her 60s. She's working two part-time jobs. She doesn't qualify for Medicaid, doesn't have employer insurance, and doesn't make enough to afford coverage through the exchange. She's uninsured and hasn't been to a doctor in years.
She came into our clinic because she couldn't breathe. It started a month ago, then got worse. She thought it was a cold. Then she thought maybe it was her heart. By the time she got to us, she was using borrowed albuterol, sleeping upright in a recliner, and barely able to walk across the room.
She had new-onset heart failure, with an ejection fraction under 25%. She was in atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. She needed oxygen, a diuretic, rhythm control, follow-up, education, and a cardiologist. She also needed a way to afford her medications and avoid another hospitalization.
We stabilized her. We got her oxygen. We got her medications through our 340B pharmacy. Our nurse followed up. Our care manager found her transportation. Our front desk enrolled her in a sliding-scale discount program. We did everything we could to keep her out of the hospital and in her home.
That's what FQHCs do. Quietly, every day, across the entire country.
But under this new law, we may not be able to do that much longer as our operating margins get even thinner. Uninsured rates will rise. Clinics will close. Access to care will shrink. And when that happens, the public will ask: how did this happen?
If you're in healthcare -- especially community-based care -- read the bill. Talk to your administrators. Talk to your legislators. The federal role in healthcare is receding. And if we don't act soon, the damage will be real, permanent, and often invisible -- until it's too late.
The "Big Beautiful Bill" may be remembered for its fiscal policy. But its deepest consequences will be felt in the quiet spaces of rural America: in exam rooms, emergency departments, and pharmacy counters where coverage used to exist.
And when those rooms are empty, we'll all be asking the same question: How did this happen?
Holland Haynie, MD, is a rural family physician and Chief Medical Officer at Central Ozarks Medical Center, where he leads efforts to expand access and improve care across underserved communities in central Missouri.
Follow the money! For your Toolbox:
The Michigan Legislature's House Fiscal Agency (HFA) home page stores current reports, plus a link to appropriation bill summaries.
Get MHF Insights
News and tips for your healthcare freedom.
We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.












