- As GOP Cries Fraud, Newsom Backs Medicaid Spending on Housing and Food
- Journalists Discuss Raw-Milk Marketing, Extreme Heat, Opioid Settlement Spending
- 15 states sue US Education Department over mental health cuts
- 23 new behavioral health study findings to know
- Illinois grows certified recovery support workforce 335% since 2022
- New Mexico awards $24.5M for behavioral health expansion
- HCA Houston Healthcare hospital names chief medical officer
- Indiana hospital credits expanded services to employee health insurance switch
- 38 behavioral health executive moves to know
- ChristianaCare’s Graham Cancer Center joins Association of American Cancer Institutes
- ‘The fight is worth it’: How rural hospitals can recover from the brink of closure
- The term ‘payvider’ isn’t very useful
- Hospital ACOs raised Medicare spending 0.8% under ACO REACH: 8 notes
- Payers are pushing the top anesthesiologists out of the insurance model
- Virginia’s largest dental group adds Overjet AI platform
- Healthcare ransomware attacks up 14%: 5 things to know
- UHS Texas behavioral hospital names CEO
- Pharmacy leaders are done waiting
- Mentorship vs. sponsorship: What actually gets women into health system C-suites?
- My Community Dental Centers appoints chief people officer
- Former Illinois dental employee pleads guilty to stealing more than $500K from practice
- CMS’ 2027 rules: Why some specialties are ‘on the outside looking in’
- U of Maryland appoints interim dental school dean
- CMS’ ASC rule: Gains for some, cuts for others
- What leaders need to know about rising mental health leave
- Colorado university closes dental clinic abruptly
- Principal to acquire Beam Benefits, dental provider serving 25,000 businesses
- CMS’ next payment move puts spine ASCs in focus
- The functions ASC leaders won’t hand off
- Washington’s noncompete ban: What healthcare employers need to know
- Doctors want wearable data but healthcare isn't ready for it, AMA survey finds
- Chattanooga Heart Institute to pay $3.75M to settle data breach lawsuit
- Watson Clinic opens multispecialty ASC
- The era of free anesthesia coverage is over
- ASA, Team Health ink deal
- MaineHealth launches psychiatric nurse practitioner, physician associate fellowship
- California completes statewide behavioral health shift: 3 things to know
- 3 DSOs making headlines
- SALT Dental Partners adds 14-office North Carolina practice
- Feds push back HIPAA security rule overhaul to July 2027
- Katie Couric's Memory Loss Scare Puts Rare Brain Condition In Spotlight
- Mild COVID Can Lead To Long-Term Hidden Eye Problems
- Star Padcev-Keytruda combo expands bladder cancer reach with FDA approval, pressuring AstraZeneca
- ACO REACH participants generated nearly $1B in 2024 savings: CMS
- Young people living with PKU take the mic in BioMarin podcast series, TikTok push
- Apollo inks €3B equity deal for stake in Bayer's contraceptives business
- Op-ed: Tackling affordability is a shared responsibility. Here's what hospitals are doing
- Pearl Health banks $110M in fresh funding to build out tech and AI for Medicare providers
- FDA rejects Hengrui, Elevar’s PD-1 liver cancer combo for a 3rd time
- LGBTQ+ People Less Likely To Be Screened For Some Common Cancers
- Smartphone App Uses Voice To Predict Asthma, COPD Flare-Ups
- Seniors Know How Sharp They Are At Any Given Time, Study Finds
- Patients Face A Thicket of Red Tape Trying To Maintain Consistent Health Coverage
- AI Can Detect Previously Invisible MS Scars In The Brain
- They Harvest the Nation’s Food, but a New Rule May Strip Them of Health Insurance
- A New Option for Long-Term Care Costs
- Sanofi snags FDA thumbs up for Sarclisa as 1st cancer drug delivered by on-body injector
- Fierce Pharma Asia—More AZ China deals; Kailera, Hengrui’s oral GLP-1 data; Scrutiny of Chinese trials
- J&J’s Tremfya retakes ad spending throne in June as Haleon tops pharma’s World Cup airings
- Aspen Dental targets fast-growing Georgia city for new practice
- Sobi earns top spot in bleeding disorder patient groups' pharma reputation rankings
- What will make or break the future of DSO success
- South Carolina cites behavioral health facility over missing correction plan
- Former Mayo Clinic research director sues system over alleged retaliation for raising AI practice concerns
- Senators urge Defense Department to expand autism therapy coverage under Tricare
- A $10B deal, China trial scrutiny and highlights from ADA 2026
- Memorial Hermann Health Plan winds down commercial coverage
- Remarks at the Society for Corporate Governance Conference
- CVS' Omnicare unit agrees to $440M settlement with DOJ in ongoing fraud case
- GLP-1 Use Hits Record High As Medicare Opens Access To Weight-Loss Drugs
- Founder of telehealth startup Done sentenced to six years in prison for Adderall fraud scheme
- HHS calls on hospitals to sign 'Make Hospital Food Healthier Pledge'
- Foundation Fights Medical Errors That Claim 200,000 U.S. Lives A Year
- Former exec alleges Alignment Healthcare leaders juiced profits to boost bonuses
- Weekly Rundown: Surgical Safety Technologies rebrands to Aimbient; UC San Diego launches applied health intelligence institute
- In compensation push, HHS gears up to draft COVID vaccine injury table
- AZ, Ionis shares tumble on ATTR-CM trial flop, but analyst flags over-reaction
- Frazier Healthcare Partners to acquire MatrixCare in $490M deal
- New, Highly Accurate Brush Test Can Detect Mouth Cancer Within An Hour
- Innovative Hip Replacement Cuts Post-Surgery Risk Of Dislocation By 70%
- Global Study Finds Kids Worldwide Skipping Fruits And Vegetables
- Ipsen’s Botox rival Dysport charts new horizons with dual phase 3 wins in migraine
- Affordable Care Act Insurers Want More Premium Increases As Enrollment Sags
- My Search for a Psychiatric Bed in an Overburdened Health System
- Dr. Reddy's presses pause on generic semaglutide supply after flagging API issue
- OpenEvidence launches medical AI copilot feature that grades medical evidence and unveils NewYork-Presbyterian collaboration
- Novo Nordisk asks public to ‘Meet Me in the Middle’ in new obesity experience installation
- BioNTech plots right-sized HER2 ADC launch to ‘build the muscle’ for BMS-partnered bispecific
- Health tech startup Forus inks partnership with GI medical society to improve medication access
- UnitedHealthcare unveils Lifestyle Spending Accounts for employer plans
- FDA hits Lundbeck with untitled letter over efficacy claims on migraine drug Vyepti
- Sanofi floats flu shot marketing pledges to pacify EU antitrust probe
- Tampa General Hospital sues Eli Lilly over pulled 340B discounts
- Viz.ai expands neurodegenerative disease care in new partnership with Cortechs.ai
- E. Coli Outbreak Prompts Recall Of Frozen Blueberries At Publix
- Drinking Coffee May Lower Your Risk of Liver Disease
- FDA halts release of new drug rejection letters while working to formalize policy
- Mass General Brigham nurses, home care clinicians launch largest healthcare strike in state history
- ACA plans set for another year of premium spikes, preliminary filings show
- AI wearables company Vilo launches Signal OS ahead of upcoming smart ring launch
- CureDuchenne lights the candles with DMD public service campaign highlighting birthdays
- Zimmer Biomet to Hire 500 in India as New Bengaluru Technology Centre Drives AI and MedTech Innovation
- Foreign drugmaker caught faking doctors’ petition to evade China’s price cut scheme
- AdaptHealth Investigates Data Breach After Social Engineering Attack, Possible Link to ShinyHunters Emerges
- Keenova gets on the good foot with Xiaflex trial win in rare tissue growth condition
- Evonik plugs $100M into Indiana drug substance plant as US CDMO demand mounts
- Rumination Plays Key Role In Caregiver Stress, Study Says
- U.S. Teens Underestimate Risks Of Fentanyl Use, Survey Finds
- Men More Likely To Be Diagnosed With Advanced Cancer
- Primary care’s AI moment
- Copay Assistance Is Meant To Defray Patient Drug Costs. Some Insurers Keep It Instead.
- Training Program Could Ward Off Injuries Among Soccer Girls
- Affordable Care Act Insurers Want More Premium Increases as Enrollment Sags
- Patients Face a Thicket of Red Tape Trying To Maintain Consistent Health Coverage
- Allergan Aesthetics helps map paths for young women in STEM with Girls Inc. event
- Thousands of Medicare Beneficiaries Thought Their Drug Plan Was Free. Then They Lost It.
- Michigan, Other States See Unusual Spike In Parasite That Causes 'Explosive' Diarrhea
- Statement on the 2026 Regulatory Agenda
- GLP-1 'Secret Shopper' Study Finds Gaps in Online Prescribing
- Applying Agentic AI to Healthcare Delivery: The Key to True Transformation
- From Compliance to Clinical Action: Fixing the Broken Loop in Post-Market Surveillance
- Fatty Liver Boosts Odds Of More Deadly Colon Cancer, Study Says
- Weight Loss Surgery Increases Risk Of Alcoholism, Study Says
- IV Vitamin C Might Boost Recuperation Among Trauma Patients
- These Church Members Disagree On Politics. Together They're Wiping Out Medical Debt.
- Exercise Can Ward Off Nicotine Fits, Help Smokers Quit
- Thousands of Medicare Beneficiaries Thought Their Drug Plan Was Free. Then They Lost It.
- Copay Assistance Is Meant To Defray Patient Drug Costs. Some Insurers Keep It Instead.
- New California Law Replaces 'Sell By' Labels On Food Packaging
- Study Raises New Questions About Artificial Sweeteners
- Calling Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Something Else Might Save More Lives, Researchers Argue
- Taking Small Breaks From Sitting Around Can Lower Your Cancer Risk
- Learning Languages Could Net You A Younger Brain, Study Says
- New Disease Threats Follow Trump Administration's Health Program Cuts
- In California Governor’s Race, Voters Face Stark Choice on Immigrant Healthcare
- Epic plans to expand 4 executives' roles as President Sumit Rana exits the company
- FDA Lets 20 ZYN Nicotine Pouches Claim Lower Risk Than Cigarettes; Critics Warn Of Danger
- Ultra-Processed Foods Linked To Brain Differences In Young Children
- Prompt Responses From Mom Might Lower A Baby's Risk Of Childhood Mental Health Problems
- Rehab Program Helps Lift Long COVID 'Brain Fog'
- Why Are You Right- Or Left-Handed? Experiments Suggest Surprisingly Simple Explanation
- Rural Americans More Likely To View Cancer As A Death Sentence, Poll Finds
- Regulatory tracker: NICE urges against future Lumakras reimbursement in UK
- Remarks at the Economic Club of New York
- Is Your Organization Ready to Govern AI in Regulatory Affairs?
- CMS Proposes TAVR Medicare Coverage is Potential Boost for Edwards Lifesciences
- Remarks to the US-CEE Connection: Transatlantic Challenges in Law, Business & Policy
- Statement Regarding Minimum Pricing Increments and Access Fee Caps
- Statement at the SEC Open Meeting on the Trade-Through Rule and Locked and Crossed Markets Provisions of Regulation NMS
- Disorder Protection Rule: Statement on the Proposed Amendments to Rule 611 and Other Provisions of Regulation NMS
Michigan healthcare freedom community forum
John Amanchukwu Sr. is saying the quiet part of Medicaid out loud.
He says it a lot better than I did in 2021 when the Biden administration reversed Trump's pro-family Medicaid policies.
Bold emphasis is mine.
Solution to Birth Rate Decline: Defund Federal ‘Family Planning’—It’s Population Control
July 11, 2025
As the White House looks at policy options to reverse the U.S. birth rate decline and incentivize more couples to have children, nobody seems to be talking about the fact that the U.S. has been funding domestic population control programs for decades now.
These programs have been disguised under the name of “family planning” and are a key cause for why America is facing a birth rate problem.
The U.S. began funding population control under President Lyndon B. Johnson when he signed into law the Economic Opportunity Act—the centerpiece of the catastrophic so-called Great Society.
He and the Democrat-controlled Congress included a provision to award federal grants to counter the “population explosion” that skyrocketed in the aftermath of World War II (i.e., the baby boom generation), which they viewed as a threat. Johnson admitted as much and stated: “[L]ess than five dollars invested in population control [was] worth a hundred dollars invested in economic growth.”
Since then, a multiple number of spinoff government programs have been created under various code names, like “family planning” (most notably), but also “reproductive health care” and “teen pregnancy prevention”—terms much more disarming than “population control.”
The evidence that all this can be blamed for U.S. marriage and birth rate declines and traced back to LBJ’s actions is overwhelming. Between 1935 and the early 1960s, the birth rate was on a consistent, steady upward climb, but then drastically dropped. America went from having 3.5 children born per woman then to less than 2 children per woman today.
The same holds true for marriage decline.
But none of this should come as a shock, especially to anyone who knows how the Great Society has been holistically implemented to socially engineer the nuclear family and pull American culture away from Biblical held beliefs on sexual mores that lead to strong, healthy marriages and families.
Heavily influenced by the ’60s sexual revolution and Marxist philosophies of liberal ruling elites—like Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger (a racist and eugenics advocate who tried to play God and use birth control and abortion to eliminate the “unfit” and black people)—LBJ’s Great Society population control/family planning initiative is a “how to” recipe for making poor lifestyle choices and turn America into a pagan nation where children are born into fatherless homes, if not aborted.
That’s why much of the hundreds of millions of tax dollars that have been directed for so-called family planning type programs flow through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (via Medicaid and the Office of Population Affairs) have landed in the pocketbooks of Planned Parenthood and a cadre of like-minded nongovernment organizations.
Of course, almost all “family planning” funded activity has been strategically targeted at poor, vulnerable women (via Medicaid), but of critical note, also students.
Keep in mind, when secularists fought and won to have prayer removed from public schools—the same era that LBJ’s Great Society was implemented—the Left quickly replaced prayer with sex education courses based on curriculum from “The Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States,” founded in 1964 by Dr. Mary Calderone. (No coincidence, she also was affiliated with Planned Parenthood and served on its board and is known to have ties to Dr. Alfred Kinsey, who held perverse beliefs, such as the claim that babies are sexual.)
But on top of the debased sexual propaganda bombarding kids’ minds, students are also steered to health clinics planted directly on school sites or nearby, funded with “family planning” taxpayer money. School-based health clinics provide a way for the Left to go behind parents’ backs and hand out condoms and birth control (including the “morning-after pill”).
So, again, there should be no surprise that birth rates and marriage have declined when the secular left has had free rein over the past several generations to indoctrinate American kids to oppose family values.
Unfortunately, it’s been rare to see Republicans oppose the government’s role in federal family planning programs. In fact, when Speaker Mike Johnson gave Fox News host Shannon Bream an interview following his first election as the House leader, he did not push back when she stated that he would be out of step with American wishes if he opposed federally funded birth control.
But he should have because that narrative is false. Federal family planning programs are rooted in population control—exactly what is espoused by globalist elites. And while defunding Planned Parenthood is a must (as the House of Representatives has voted to do), we should go further and defund everything related to “family planning.”
This will not just save America millions of wasted dollars, but it will help save our nation from this suicidal mission that has been tearing down traditional marriage and the family as an institution.
John Amanchukwu Sr. is a black conservative, Daily Signal contributor, Turning Point USA contributor, and pastor.
What's the difference between qualifying for Medicaid reimbursement, and having a right to it?
I'm so glad you asked.
The Daily Signal makes it look simple.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/06/26/supreme-court-rules-major-abortion-case/
Supreme Court Rules Whether States Can Block Planned Parenthood From Receiving Medicaid Funding
Virginia Allen | Tyler O'Neil | June 26, 2025
The Supreme Court ruled against Planned Parenthood Thursday, handing a significant win to the pro-life movement.
In the case Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, the justices ruled, 6-3, that South Carolina can legally block Planned Parenthood facilities from receiving Medicaid funding.
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined. Thomas also filed a concurring opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissenting opinion, and Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined her opinion.
In order to receive federal funding through Medicaid, states must submit to the secretary of health and human services a “plan for medical assistance.” These plans must satisfy more than 80 separate conditions Congress set out in the law. The federal government has provided, on average, about 57% of the funds to implement Medicaid, with states making up the rest.
The law requires states to ensure that “any individual eligible for medical assistance … may obtain” it “from any [provider] qualified to perform the services … who undertakes to provide it.”
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic operates two clinics in South Carolina, one in each of the state’s two most populous cities. Citing a state law prohibiting the use of funding for abortion, South Carolina announced in July 2018 that Planned Parenthood could no longer participate in the state’s Medicaid program. The state also took actions to ensure that a “variety of other nongovernmental entities and governmental agencies” would continue to provide “access to necessary medical care and important women’s health and family planning services.” The state has 140 federally qualified health clinics and pregnancy centers, for instance.
Gorsuch ruled that Congress did not create a right to allow individuals to sue in cases like this.
“Congress knows how to give a grantee clear and unambiguous notice that, if it accepts federal funds, it may face private suits asserting an individual right to choose a medical provider,” he wrote. Congress did not do this.
The law “permits private plaintiffs to sue for violations of federal spending-power statutes only in ‘atypical’ situations … where the provision in question ‘clear[ly]’ and ‘unambiguous[ly]’ confers an individual ‘right,’” but the law at hand “is not such a statute,” Gorsuch ruled.
Civil Rights Act Arguments
Jackson wrote that the Civil Rights Act of 1871, which permits any citizen to obtain redress in federal court for “the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the U.S., should bar South Carolina from defunding Planned Parenthood. She wrote that allowing the defunding enables South Carolina to “evade liability for violating the rights of its Medicaid recipients to choose their own doctors.”
Thomas wrote that, while few courts adjudicated cases involving that particular provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 in the first 50 years since it was passed, courts have faced a “deluge” of such cases since 1961.
“Notwithstanding its origins as an ‘extraordinary remedy passed during Reconstruction to protect basic civil rights against oppressive state action,’ [secion 1983] now serves as ‘simply one more weapon in the litigant’s arsenal,’” he noted. “The ‘scant resemblance’ between [section 1983] today and [section 1983] as it was traditionally understood creates good reason to doubt our modern understanding.”
He called for “a more fundamental reexamination” of how the Supreme Court interprets the provision.
Defunding Planned Parenthood
In 2018, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster, a Republican, signed an executive action directing the state’s Department of Health and Human Services to remove Planned Parenthood from South Carolina’s Medicaid provider list.
The Republican governor argued that any funding to Planned Parenthood, even if not directly used for abortions, indirectly funds abortions and undermines the state’s commitment to protect the unborn.
“This case is about protecting the sanctity of life and preserving South Carolina’s right to govern itself in a way that reflects the values of its people,” McMaster said in a statement in February.
“South Carolina has made it clear that we value the right to life,” McMaster continued. “Therefore, taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize abortion providers who are in direct opposition to their beliefs. Just as I was in 2018, I am confident in our authority to terminate funding for Planned Parenthood, and I trust that the U.S. Supreme Court will agree.”
There are two Planned Parenthood clinics in South Carolina, one in Columbia and another in Charleston.
“South Carolina is facing an ever-worsening reproductive health care crisis,” Vicki Ringer, South Carolina director of public affairs for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, said in a statement in February.
“In just under two years, we’ve already heard countless stories of distress, bodily harm, persecution, and even death, from patients whose care was delayed or denied due to these bans,” Ringer said. “If anti-abortion lawmakers are allowed to act unchecked, they will revoke our access to this care altogether—with no exceptions. We must continue to take them to task—in the legislature, in the courts, and in our communities.”
Alliance Defending Freedom, a large Christian legal organization, represented South Carolina in the case and argued before the Supreme Court in April that states have a right to determine which entities in that state receive Medicaid funds.
The lawyer representing Planned Parenthood argued that patients should be allowed to sue when their chosen health care provider is denied to them.
Kelsey Reinhardt, president of CatholicVote, praised the Supreme Court’s ruling as a “a major pro-life victory.”
“For too long, taxpayer dollars—including those of pro-life Americans and faithful Catholics—have been used to fund an industry built on the destruction of innocent human life,” Reinhardt said. “No one should be forced to subsidize abortion.”
“With today’s ruling, CatholicVote urges lawmakers to redirect support to organizations that uphold the dignity of both mother and child—especially the thousands of pregnancy resource centers that offer real help to women, without sacrificing their children or compromising their safety,” Reinhardt added.
New US birth numbers for 2024 came out Thursday. They continue to fall, but the really interesting part is the AP's creative spin.
https://apnews.com/article/fertility-rate-us-low-cdc-replacement-532c4f43f420f29b32212db9cfa0e0af
The US fertility rate reached a new low in 2024, CDC data shows
NEW YORK (AP) — The fertility rate in the U.S. dropped to an all-time low in 2024 with less than 1.6 kids per woman, new federal data released Thursday shows.
The U.S. was once among only a few developed countries with a rate that ensured each generation had enough children to replace itself — about 2.1 kids per woman. But it has been sliding in America for close to two decades as more women are waiting longer to have children or never taking that step at all.
The new statistic is on par with fertility rates in western European countries, according to World Bank data.
Alarmed by recent drops, the Trump administration has taken steps to increase falling birth rates, like issuing an executive order meant to expand access to and reduce costs of in vitro fertilization and backing the idea of “baby bonuses” that might encourage more couples to have kids.
But there’s no reason to be alarmed, according to Leslie Root, a University of Colorado Boulder researcher focused on fertility and population policy.
“We’re seeing this as part of an ongoing process of fertility delay. We know that the U.S. population is still growing, and we still have a natural increase — more births than deaths,” she said.
Most say low birth rates are a low priority: AP-NORC poll
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released the statistic for the total fertility rate with updated birth data for 2024.
In the early 1960s, the U.S. total fertility rate was around 3.5, but plummeted to 1.7 by 1976 after the Baby Boom ended. It gradually rose to 2.1 in 2007 before falling again, aside from a 2014 uptick. The rate in 2023 was 1.621, and inched down in 2024 to 1.599, according to the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics.
People are marrying later and also worried about their ability to have the money, health insurance and other resources needed to raise children in a stable environment.
“Worry is not a good moment to have kids,” and that’s why birth rates in most age groups are not improving, she said.
Asked about birth-promoting measures outlined by the Trump administration, Guzzo said they don’t tackle larger needs like parental leave and affordable child care.
“The things that they are doing are really symbolic and not likely to budge things for real Americans,” she said.
Increase in births in new data
The CDC’s new report, which is based on a more complete review of birth certificates than provisional data released earlier this year, also showed a 1% increase in births — about 33,000 more — last year compared to the prior year.
That brought the yearly national total to just over 3.6 million babies born.
But this is different: The provisional data indicated birth rate increases last year for women in their late 20s and 30s. However, the new report found birth rate declines for women in their 20s and early 30s, and no change for women in their late 30s.
What happened? CDC officials said it was due to recalculations stemming from a change in the U.S. Census population estimates used to compute the birth rate.
That’s plausible, Root said. As the total population of women of childbearing age grew due to immigration, it offset small increases in births to women in those age groups, she said.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Planned Parenthood's lawsuit won back Trump Administration Medicaid funding in federal court yesterday.
https://apnews.com/article/planned-parenthood-funding-cuts-ruling-343034bc26917049d6d58a8ba8c58c21
Judge blocks Trump administration’s efforts to defund Planned Parenthood
By KIMBERLEE KRUESI and THE ASSOCIATED PRESS | July 28, 2025
A federal judge on Monday ruled Planned Parenthood clinics nationwide must continue to be reimbursed for Medicaid funding as the nation’s largest abortion provider fights President Donald Trump’s administration over efforts to defund the organization in his signature tax legislation.
The new order replaces a previous edict handed down by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston last week. Talwani initially granted a preliminary injunction specifically blocking the government from cutting Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood members that didn’t provide abortion care or didn’t meet a threshold of at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in a given year.
“Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable,” Talwani wrote in her Monday order. “In particular, restricting Members’ ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs.”
A provision in Trump’s tax bill instructed the federal government to end Medicaid payments for one year to abortion providers that received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023, even to those like Planned Parenthood that also offer medical services like contraception, pregnancy tests and STD testing.
Although Planned Parenthood is not specifically named in the statute, which went into effect July 4, the organization’s leaders say it was meant to affect their nearly 600 centers in 48 states. However, a major medical provider in Maine and likely others have also been hit.
In her Monday order, Talwani said that the court was “not enjoining the federal government from regulating abortion and is not directing the federal government to fund elective abortions or any healthcare service not otherwise eligible for Medicaid coverage.” Instead, Talwani said that her decision would block the federal government from excluding groups like Planned Parenthood from Medicaid reimbursements when they have demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success in their legal challenge.
In its lawsuit, Planned Parenthood had argued that they would be at risk of closing nearly 200 clinics in 24 states if they are cut off from Medicaid funds. They estimated this would result in more than 1 million patients losing care.
“We’re suing the Trump administration over this targeted attack on Planned Parenthood health centers and the patients who rely on them for care,” said Planned Parenthood’s president and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson in a statement on Monday. “This case is about making sure that patients who use Medicaid as their insurance to get birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment can continue to do so at their local Planned Parenthood health center, and we will make that clear in court.”
The lawsuit was filed earlier this month against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. by Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its member organizations in Massachusetts and Utah.
A health department spokesperson reiterated Monday that the agency strongly disagreed with the judge’s order, repeating previous arguments that her decision “undermines state flexibility and disregards longstanding concerns about accountability.”
“States should not be forced to fund organizations that have chosen political advocacy over patient care,” said the department’s communication director, Andrew Nixon, in an email.
Medicaid is a government health care program that serves millions of low-income and disabled Americans. Nearly half of Planned Parenthood’s patients rely on Medicaid.
Get MHF Insights
News and tips for your healthcare freedom.
We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.
























