- States ranked by share of healthcare workers
- CMS finalizes framework for Medicaid work rules: 8 things to know
- Ochsner exec joins UMC New Orleans as COO
- Boston Children’s saves $7M, 60K hours with OpenAI
- From Calls to Clicks: Where Patient Experience Meets Throughput
- Maternal mental health grades by state
- 6 unique Rural Health Transformation fund proposals
- Illinois hospital taps CFO
- UHS Texas hospital taps new CFO
- Student debt rewrites oral surgery succession plans
- Health systems aren’t just killing more AI projects — they’re starting fewer
- Centerstone begins CEO transition
- 720 hospitals at risk of closure, by state
- Nonprofit opens dental center in Maine with $2M in funding
- 16 new behavioral health study findings to know
- AdventHealth relocates cardiology practice in Georgia
- Anesthesia under fire: 3 recent legal, policy fights
- Former lab CEO, physician to pay $1.2M+ to settle kickback scheme allegations
- MDMA-assisted therapy, explained
- PDS Health continues de novo growth with 5 new practices
- Commission Statement on the Passing of Former General Counsel David Becker
- 5 highest-paying states for specialty dentists
- Virginia oral surgery center opens 6th office
- New York health system to shutter ASC amid declining patient volume
- North Carolina projects $1B autism therapy spending: 6 notes
- 3 dental leadership moves to know
- CMS outlines national framework to support rollout of Medicaid work requirements
- The rise of the physician side hustle
- How NYU Langone is helping modernize a decades-old GI surgery tool
- The 6 highest-paying practice settings for ophthalmologists
- Dentists’ pay dipped the most in these 10 states
- Where the largest DSOs stand halfway through 2026
- ASCA elects new board president
- 7 physician practices shut their doors in 1 month
- Physician groups welcome IDR rule changes
- Indiana dental office suffers data breach affecting 5,900 individuals
- Your Surprise Medical Bill May Be Gone — But Your Premiums Could Still Spike
- New Connecticut private equity law bans hospital sale-leasebacks
- 17 dentists making headlines
- Mental health ED visits on the rise in 2026: 5 things to know
- How 4 systems are breaking the ED boarding cycle
- Trump signs off on HHS overhaul of childhood vaccine schedule with new executive order
- Trump signs off on HHS overhaul of childhood vaccine schedule with new executive order
- Short-Term Fasting Could Boost Chemo Response in Ovarian Cancer, Study Suggests
- MedTech In Focus: AI impact in healthcare
- MedTech In Focus: AI impact in healthcare
- If Your AI Can’t Explain Itself, Can FDA Authorize It?
- If Your AI Can’t Explain Itself, Can FDA Authorize It?
- Shionogi's COVID antiviral Xocova passes muster with FDA as post-exposure preventative
- How HER2 biology is shaping next-generation cancer treatment
- Workout Habits May Protect Against Inherited Heart Problems
- Childhood Lying Is Normal and Rarely Signals Behavioral Concerns, Study Says
- Perfectionism Among College Students Reaches Record High, Fueling Anxiety
- After Her Bout of Amnesia, A $59,000 Billing Dispute Wouldn't Go Away
- Weed Linked To Higher Testosterone Levels In Young Men
- Amid Ebola, Hantavirus Outbreaks, Democrats Decry Trump’s Health Cuts
- Baffling. Frustrating. Frightening. What It’s Like To Be Sued Over Medical Debt.
- Telehealth Booms as Demand for GLP-1s Surges and Questions Mount About Safety, Oversight
- ViiV Healthcare launches ‘PrEP Wisdom’ campaign to boost awareness of long-acting HIV prevention meds
- Noom launches at-home biomarker test kit for metabolic health monitoring
- ASCO: AstraZeneca's Imfinzi, Imjudo duo shines in earlier-stage liver cancer
- CVS, Walgreens and Walmart defeat opioid lawsuit brought by Florida hospitals
- ASCO: Sac-TMT’s massive phase 3 program has a jarring gap. Does Merck plan to close it?
- ASCO: Akeso’s ivonescimab bests PD-1 inhibitor in lung cancer chemo combos, slashing death risk by 34%
- ASCO: J&J breaks the prostate cancer treatment mold with fresh Erleada ph. 3 win
- ASCO: Revolution Medicines confident in RAS leadership as rivals square up
- Contraception For Teens: Let's Talk About It
- Gounder Gives Lowdown on Ebola, Peptides, and Colorectal Screenings
- ASCO: Pfizer one-ups J&J with Talzenna combo's broad castration-sensitive prostate cancer win
- ASCO: Lilly ties Retevmo to ‘dramatic’ outcomes in early-stage lung cancer with rare RET biomarker
- ASCO: With bispecifics on its heels, Incyte positions Monjuvi combo for first-line DLBCL
- Budget-Strapped Montana Will Stress-Test Trump’s Medicaid Work Rules
- The behavioral health workforce pipeline: Where it stands and where it’s headed
- 6 major investments in youth behavioral health
- Climate Change: Statement on Proposed Rescission of Climate-Related Disclosure Rules
- Kenyan Court Blocks Trump's Plan To Quarantine Ebola Patients
- Patient death draws renewed CMS scrutiny at HCA’s Mission Hospital
- Statement of Commissioner Mark T. Uyeda on the Rescission of Climate-Related Disclosure Rules
- Keynote Remarks at the 2026 Reagan National Economic Forum
- Statement on Proposing Release for Rescission of Climate-Related Disclosure Rules
- Mental Health Disorders Now No. 1 Cause of Disability Worldwide
- Massachusetts AG sues UnitedHealthcare over alleged Medicaid fraud
- Enzo Health launches agentic EHR for home health agencies
- UnitedHealthcare to nix nearly two thirds of pediatric prior auths
- Industry Voices—Patients are building a new healthcare system. The industry is finally catching up
- Weekly Rundown—Moffitt Cancer Center expands Reimagine Care's virtual oncology model; Tanner Health deploys AI workforce solution
- Study: LA Canine Outbreak Caused By Low Vaccination Rates, Crowded Boarding
- Ocrelizumab Effective In Slowing Progressive MS, Trial Shows
- Long COVID Might Be Twice As Common As Previously Thought
- In Vaccine-Skeptical California County, A Potential Playbook To Contain Measles
- Heavy Drinking Harms College Students' Brain Power, Study Finds
- After Her Bout of Amnesia, a $59,000 Billing Dispute Wouldn’t Go Away
- A Trump Stronghold Grapples With Health Risks of ICE Detention Sites
- Pharma urged to modernize patient support as young adult cancer rates rise
- Philips adds a spoonful of Disney sugar to ease kids’ MRI anxieties
- MannKind seeks long-awaited sales boost with inhaled insulin approval for kids
- Brand-name drug prices climb after launch in US, fall abroad amid MFN push: report
- ASCO: After Takeda’s defeat, Dizal picks up baton to take on J&J in EGFR lung cancer subtype
- AstraZeneca gains 2nd bladder cancer nod in key expansion for Imfinzi
- Advocate Health grows Q1 revenue by 10.8% amid higher volumes, greater efficiency
- Bangladesh Measles Surge Kills 500+ Children; Vaccine Delays Blamed
- Care navigation startup Garner Health banks $100M series E at $2.74B valuation
- HCA bolsters workforce pipeline with healthcare professional college acquisition
- Plant-Based Diet May Cut Obesity Risk For Women In Menopause
- Pharma leaders meet with PM Takaichi in push for Japan to retain R&D edge
- Penn Medicine, K Health partner to deploy AI clinical agents
- CVS restores coverage of Eli Lilly obesity med Zepbound, adds new pill Foundayo
- CVS restores coverage of Eli Lilly obesity med Zepbound, adds new pill Foundayo
- CMS finalizes changes to No Surprises Act dispute resolution process
- Smartwatch App Accurately Detects Major Epileptic Seizures
- Racial Gap Exists For Asthma Inhaler Use
- New Colon Cancer Screening Guidelines Add Blood And At-Home Tests
- Fierce Pharma Asia—More China biotech hawkishness; Pfizer’s $10B Innovent deal; Astellas’ roadmap
- CVS expands partnership with Salesforce for greater call center personalization
- Nurse Convicted In Patient's Death Turns Fatal Drug Error Into Cautionary Tale
- Wearable Ultrasound Patch Monitors High-Risk Pregnancies In Real Time
- In a Vaccine-Skeptical California County, a Potential Playbook To Contain Measles
- Listen to the Latest ‘KFF Health News Minute’
- PharmaEssentia taps Incyte alum Eric Vogel as it eyes Besremi expansion
- Privacy and PetShops: Remarks at the Regulatory PETshop Series: Cryptographic Technologies and Financial Services Regulation
- Why direct-to-patient is the future of pharma access
- Hospitals again ask FTC, DOJ for exemption from expanded premerger notification filings
- Coalition for Health AI unveils governance playbooks for responsible AI adoption
- U.S. To Keep Ebola-Exposed Citizens In Kenya Under New Policy
- Cleveland Clinic, Aspira Women’s Health partner on AI-powered women's health diagnostics
- CAT on a Hot Tin Roof
- GLP-1 Meds May Help Slow the Spread of Certain Obesity-Related Cancers
- Weight-Loss Program Helps Women Battling Breast Cancer
- Younger U.S. Women of Color Face Rising Breast Cancer Deaths
- High Fitness Doesn’t Raise A-fib Risk In Young Men, Study Finds
- Cheaper, Alternative Health Plans Are Having A Moment, But Critics Urge Caution
- Ultrafine Wildfire Smoke Particles May Pose Serious Health Risks
- Nurse Convicted in Patient’s Death Turns Fatal Drug Error Into a Cautionary Tale
- Remarks at the Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance
- Trump Admin Bars Key U.S. Researchers From Global Virus Response Talk
- Everyone Has A Family Doc, But Can You Get An Appointment?
- Many U.S. College Students With Psychosis Are Not Receiving Treatment
- Antibiotics Won't Help Ease Asthma-Linked Wheezing in Kids
- Yoga Eases Insomnia And Anxiety In Cancer Survivors, Study Finds
- Dust Yields Clues to Viral Outbreaks, Study Finds
- 3 Medical Routines That Older People May Not Need
- Acting NIAID Chief Steps Down Amid Ebola, Hantavirus Concerns
- Sunscreen Confusion Puts More Americans At Risk For Melanoma
- 1 In 10 U.S. Surgeons Quit Practice, Study Warns Of Shortage
- Video Game Can Detect Depression In Minutes, Study Says
- Fixing Eligibility at the Point of Care: The Missing Link in Medical Device Reimbursement Integrity
- Fixing Eligibility at the Point of Care: The Missing Link in Medical Device Reimbursement Integrity
- The failure of the ‘usual suspects’ approach to life science recruitment
- The failure of the ‘usual suspects’ approach to life science recruitment
- Statement on Novel Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
John Amanchukwu Sr. is saying the quiet part of Medicaid out loud.
He says it a lot better than I did in 2021 when the Biden administration reversed Trump's pro-family Medicaid policies.
Bold emphasis is mine.
Solution to Birth Rate Decline: Defund Federal ‘Family Planning’—It’s Population Control
July 11, 2025
As the White House looks at policy options to reverse the U.S. birth rate decline and incentivize more couples to have children, nobody seems to be talking about the fact that the U.S. has been funding domestic population control programs for decades now.
These programs have been disguised under the name of “family planning” and are a key cause for why America is facing a birth rate problem.
The U.S. began funding population control under President Lyndon B. Johnson when he signed into law the Economic Opportunity Act—the centerpiece of the catastrophic so-called Great Society.
He and the Democrat-controlled Congress included a provision to award federal grants to counter the “population explosion” that skyrocketed in the aftermath of World War II (i.e., the baby boom generation), which they viewed as a threat. Johnson admitted as much and stated: “[L]ess than five dollars invested in population control [was] worth a hundred dollars invested in economic growth.”
Since then, a multiple number of spinoff government programs have been created under various code names, like “family planning” (most notably), but also “reproductive health care” and “teen pregnancy prevention”—terms much more disarming than “population control.”
The evidence that all this can be blamed for U.S. marriage and birth rate declines and traced back to LBJ’s actions is overwhelming. Between 1935 and the early 1960s, the birth rate was on a consistent, steady upward climb, but then drastically dropped. America went from having 3.5 children born per woman then to less than 2 children per woman today.
The same holds true for marriage decline.
But none of this should come as a shock, especially to anyone who knows how the Great Society has been holistically implemented to socially engineer the nuclear family and pull American culture away from Biblical held beliefs on sexual mores that lead to strong, healthy marriages and families.
Heavily influenced by the ’60s sexual revolution and Marxist philosophies of liberal ruling elites—like Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger (a racist and eugenics advocate who tried to play God and use birth control and abortion to eliminate the “unfit” and black people)—LBJ’s Great Society population control/family planning initiative is a “how to” recipe for making poor lifestyle choices and turn America into a pagan nation where children are born into fatherless homes, if not aborted.
That’s why much of the hundreds of millions of tax dollars that have been directed for so-called family planning type programs flow through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (via Medicaid and the Office of Population Affairs) have landed in the pocketbooks of Planned Parenthood and a cadre of like-minded nongovernment organizations.
Of course, almost all “family planning” funded activity has been strategically targeted at poor, vulnerable women (via Medicaid), but of critical note, also students.
Keep in mind, when secularists fought and won to have prayer removed from public schools—the same era that LBJ’s Great Society was implemented—the Left quickly replaced prayer with sex education courses based on curriculum from “The Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States,” founded in 1964 by Dr. Mary Calderone. (No coincidence, she also was affiliated with Planned Parenthood and served on its board and is known to have ties to Dr. Alfred Kinsey, who held perverse beliefs, such as the claim that babies are sexual.)
But on top of the debased sexual propaganda bombarding kids’ minds, students are also steered to health clinics planted directly on school sites or nearby, funded with “family planning” taxpayer money. School-based health clinics provide a way for the Left to go behind parents’ backs and hand out condoms and birth control (including the “morning-after pill”).
So, again, there should be no surprise that birth rates and marriage have declined when the secular left has had free rein over the past several generations to indoctrinate American kids to oppose family values.
Unfortunately, it’s been rare to see Republicans oppose the government’s role in federal family planning programs. In fact, when Speaker Mike Johnson gave Fox News host Shannon Bream an interview following his first election as the House leader, he did not push back when she stated that he would be out of step with American wishes if he opposed federally funded birth control.
But he should have because that narrative is false. Federal family planning programs are rooted in population control—exactly what is espoused by globalist elites. And while defunding Planned Parenthood is a must (as the House of Representatives has voted to do), we should go further and defund everything related to “family planning.”
This will not just save America millions of wasted dollars, but it will help save our nation from this suicidal mission that has been tearing down traditional marriage and the family as an institution.
John Amanchukwu Sr. is a black conservative, Daily Signal contributor, Turning Point USA contributor, and pastor.
What's the difference between qualifying for Medicaid reimbursement, and having a right to it?
I'm so glad you asked.
The Daily Signal makes it look simple.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/06/26/supreme-court-rules-major-abortion-case/
Supreme Court Rules Whether States Can Block Planned Parenthood From Receiving Medicaid Funding
Virginia Allen | Tyler O'Neil | June 26, 2025
The Supreme Court ruled against Planned Parenthood Thursday, handing a significant win to the pro-life movement.
In the case Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, the justices ruled, 6-3, that South Carolina can legally block Planned Parenthood facilities from receiving Medicaid funding.
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined. Thomas also filed a concurring opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissenting opinion, and Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined her opinion.
In order to receive federal funding through Medicaid, states must submit to the secretary of health and human services a “plan for medical assistance.” These plans must satisfy more than 80 separate conditions Congress set out in the law. The federal government has provided, on average, about 57% of the funds to implement Medicaid, with states making up the rest.
The law requires states to ensure that “any individual eligible for medical assistance … may obtain” it “from any [provider] qualified to perform the services … who undertakes to provide it.”
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic operates two clinics in South Carolina, one in each of the state’s two most populous cities. Citing a state law prohibiting the use of funding for abortion, South Carolina announced in July 2018 that Planned Parenthood could no longer participate in the state’s Medicaid program. The state also took actions to ensure that a “variety of other nongovernmental entities and governmental agencies” would continue to provide “access to necessary medical care and important women’s health and family planning services.” The state has 140 federally qualified health clinics and pregnancy centers, for instance.
Gorsuch ruled that Congress did not create a right to allow individuals to sue in cases like this.
“Congress knows how to give a grantee clear and unambiguous notice that, if it accepts federal funds, it may face private suits asserting an individual right to choose a medical provider,” he wrote. Congress did not do this.
The law “permits private plaintiffs to sue for violations of federal spending-power statutes only in ‘atypical’ situations … where the provision in question ‘clear[ly]’ and ‘unambiguous[ly]’ confers an individual ‘right,’” but the law at hand “is not such a statute,” Gorsuch ruled.
Civil Rights Act Arguments
Jackson wrote that the Civil Rights Act of 1871, which permits any citizen to obtain redress in federal court for “the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” of the U.S., should bar South Carolina from defunding Planned Parenthood. She wrote that allowing the defunding enables South Carolina to “evade liability for violating the rights of its Medicaid recipients to choose their own doctors.”
Thomas wrote that, while few courts adjudicated cases involving that particular provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 in the first 50 years since it was passed, courts have faced a “deluge” of such cases since 1961.
“Notwithstanding its origins as an ‘extraordinary remedy passed during Reconstruction to protect basic civil rights against oppressive state action,’ [secion 1983] now serves as ‘simply one more weapon in the litigant’s arsenal,’” he noted. “The ‘scant resemblance’ between [section 1983] today and [section 1983] as it was traditionally understood creates good reason to doubt our modern understanding.”
He called for “a more fundamental reexamination” of how the Supreme Court interprets the provision.
Defunding Planned Parenthood
In 2018, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster, a Republican, signed an executive action directing the state’s Department of Health and Human Services to remove Planned Parenthood from South Carolina’s Medicaid provider list.
The Republican governor argued that any funding to Planned Parenthood, even if not directly used for abortions, indirectly funds abortions and undermines the state’s commitment to protect the unborn.
“This case is about protecting the sanctity of life and preserving South Carolina’s right to govern itself in a way that reflects the values of its people,” McMaster said in a statement in February.
“South Carolina has made it clear that we value the right to life,” McMaster continued. “Therefore, taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize abortion providers who are in direct opposition to their beliefs. Just as I was in 2018, I am confident in our authority to terminate funding for Planned Parenthood, and I trust that the U.S. Supreme Court will agree.”
There are two Planned Parenthood clinics in South Carolina, one in Columbia and another in Charleston.
“South Carolina is facing an ever-worsening reproductive health care crisis,” Vicki Ringer, South Carolina director of public affairs for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, said in a statement in February.
“In just under two years, we’ve already heard countless stories of distress, bodily harm, persecution, and even death, from patients whose care was delayed or denied due to these bans,” Ringer said. “If anti-abortion lawmakers are allowed to act unchecked, they will revoke our access to this care altogether—with no exceptions. We must continue to take them to task—in the legislature, in the courts, and in our communities.”
Alliance Defending Freedom, a large Christian legal organization, represented South Carolina in the case and argued before the Supreme Court in April that states have a right to determine which entities in that state receive Medicaid funds.
The lawyer representing Planned Parenthood argued that patients should be allowed to sue when their chosen health care provider is denied to them.
Kelsey Reinhardt, president of CatholicVote, praised the Supreme Court’s ruling as a “a major pro-life victory.”
“For too long, taxpayer dollars—including those of pro-life Americans and faithful Catholics—have been used to fund an industry built on the destruction of innocent human life,” Reinhardt said. “No one should be forced to subsidize abortion.”
“With today’s ruling, CatholicVote urges lawmakers to redirect support to organizations that uphold the dignity of both mother and child—especially the thousands of pregnancy resource centers that offer real help to women, without sacrificing their children or compromising their safety,” Reinhardt added.
New US birth numbers for 2024 came out Thursday. They continue to fall, but the really interesting part is the AP's creative spin.
https://apnews.com/article/fertility-rate-us-low-cdc-replacement-532c4f43f420f29b32212db9cfa0e0af
The US fertility rate reached a new low in 2024, CDC data shows
NEW YORK (AP) — The fertility rate in the U.S. dropped to an all-time low in 2024 with less than 1.6 kids per woman, new federal data released Thursday shows.
The U.S. was once among only a few developed countries with a rate that ensured each generation had enough children to replace itself — about 2.1 kids per woman. But it has been sliding in America for close to two decades as more women are waiting longer to have children or never taking that step at all.
The new statistic is on par with fertility rates in western European countries, according to World Bank data.
Alarmed by recent drops, the Trump administration has taken steps to increase falling birth rates, like issuing an executive order meant to expand access to and reduce costs of in vitro fertilization and backing the idea of “baby bonuses” that might encourage more couples to have kids.
But there’s no reason to be alarmed, according to Leslie Root, a University of Colorado Boulder researcher focused on fertility and population policy.
“We’re seeing this as part of an ongoing process of fertility delay. We know that the U.S. population is still growing, and we still have a natural increase — more births than deaths,” she said.
Most say low birth rates are a low priority: AP-NORC poll
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released the statistic for the total fertility rate with updated birth data for 2024.
In the early 1960s, the U.S. total fertility rate was around 3.5, but plummeted to 1.7 by 1976 after the Baby Boom ended. It gradually rose to 2.1 in 2007 before falling again, aside from a 2014 uptick. The rate in 2023 was 1.621, and inched down in 2024 to 1.599, according to the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics.
People are marrying later and also worried about their ability to have the money, health insurance and other resources needed to raise children in a stable environment.
“Worry is not a good moment to have kids,” and that’s why birth rates in most age groups are not improving, she said.
Asked about birth-promoting measures outlined by the Trump administration, Guzzo said they don’t tackle larger needs like parental leave and affordable child care.
“The things that they are doing are really symbolic and not likely to budge things for real Americans,” she said.
Increase in births in new data
The CDC’s new report, which is based on a more complete review of birth certificates than provisional data released earlier this year, also showed a 1% increase in births — about 33,000 more — last year compared to the prior year.
That brought the yearly national total to just over 3.6 million babies born.
But this is different: The provisional data indicated birth rate increases last year for women in their late 20s and 30s. However, the new report found birth rate declines for women in their 20s and early 30s, and no change for women in their late 30s.
What happened? CDC officials said it was due to recalculations stemming from a change in the U.S. Census population estimates used to compute the birth rate.
That’s plausible, Root said. As the total population of women of childbearing age grew due to immigration, it offset small increases in births to women in those age groups, she said.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Planned Parenthood's lawsuit won back Trump Administration Medicaid funding in federal court yesterday.
https://apnews.com/article/planned-parenthood-funding-cuts-ruling-343034bc26917049d6d58a8ba8c58c21
Judge blocks Trump administration’s efforts to defund Planned Parenthood
By KIMBERLEE KRUESI and THE ASSOCIATED PRESS | July 28, 2025
A federal judge on Monday ruled Planned Parenthood clinics nationwide must continue to be reimbursed for Medicaid funding as the nation’s largest abortion provider fights President Donald Trump’s administration over efforts to defund the organization in his signature tax legislation.
The new order replaces a previous edict handed down by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston last week. Talwani initially granted a preliminary injunction specifically blocking the government from cutting Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood members that didn’t provide abortion care or didn’t meet a threshold of at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in a given year.
“Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable,” Talwani wrote in her Monday order. “In particular, restricting Members’ ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs.”
A provision in Trump’s tax bill instructed the federal government to end Medicaid payments for one year to abortion providers that received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023, even to those like Planned Parenthood that also offer medical services like contraception, pregnancy tests and STD testing.
Although Planned Parenthood is not specifically named in the statute, which went into effect July 4, the organization’s leaders say it was meant to affect their nearly 600 centers in 48 states. However, a major medical provider in Maine and likely others have also been hit.
In her Monday order, Talwani said that the court was “not enjoining the federal government from regulating abortion and is not directing the federal government to fund elective abortions or any healthcare service not otherwise eligible for Medicaid coverage.” Instead, Talwani said that her decision would block the federal government from excluding groups like Planned Parenthood from Medicaid reimbursements when they have demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success in their legal challenge.
In its lawsuit, Planned Parenthood had argued that they would be at risk of closing nearly 200 clinics in 24 states if they are cut off from Medicaid funds. They estimated this would result in more than 1 million patients losing care.
“We’re suing the Trump administration over this targeted attack on Planned Parenthood health centers and the patients who rely on them for care,” said Planned Parenthood’s president and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson in a statement on Monday. “This case is about making sure that patients who use Medicaid as their insurance to get birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment can continue to do so at their local Planned Parenthood health center, and we will make that clear in court.”
The lawsuit was filed earlier this month against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. by Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its member organizations in Massachusetts and Utah.
A health department spokesperson reiterated Monday that the agency strongly disagreed with the judge’s order, repeating previous arguments that her decision “undermines state flexibility and disregards longstanding concerns about accountability.”
“States should not be forced to fund organizations that have chosen political advocacy over patient care,” said the department’s communication director, Andrew Nixon, in an email.
Medicaid is a government health care program that serves millions of low-income and disabled Americans. Nearly half of Planned Parenthood’s patients rely on Medicaid.
Get MHF Insights
News and tips for your healthcare freedom.
We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.
















