An Alberta provincial bill would limit medical assistance in dying (MAiD).  This is the first attempt in Canada to limit euthanasia since it became legal in 2016.  It comes one year before people, whose only medical condition is mental illness, are euthanized:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8d5d54glreo

Alberta seeks to set limits on use of medically assisted dying
By Jessica Murphy and Sareen Habeshian - March 18, 2026

Alberta has proposed a bill that would limit the use of medically assisted dying - also known as voluntary euthanasia - in the Canadian province solely to end-of-life circumstances.

In 2021, Canada expanded access to medically assisted dying, known domestically by the acronym Maid, to people with serious, incurable illnesses or disabilities, even if their death is not reasonably foreseeable.

Canada is also due to expand access next year to people whose only medical condition is mental illness, though that has twice been delayed.

Alberta is the first jurisdiction in Canada to independently propose limits to the practice.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, said during a news conference on Wednesday that Maid should only be an option for those with no hope of recovery.

"This legislation strengthens safeguards and restores clear limits on eligibility to protect vulnerable Albertans facing mental illness or living with disabilities," she said. "Those struggling with severe mental health challenges need treatment, compassion and support, not a path to end their life at what may be their lowest moment."

The proposed seeks to prohibit doctors from unilaterally raising Maid with patients and banning its public advertising in healthcare facilities. It would also enshrine conscience protections for healthcare professionals and institutions.

While polls indicate there is broad support in Canada for medically assisted dying, there has also been widespread debate about the programme's expansion and concerns over whether appropriate safeguards are in place.

Canada first legalised euthanasia in 2016 for people with terminal illnesses before expanding it to people with serious and chronic physical conditions, following a court case in the province of Quebec.

Medically assisted deaths accounted for roughly 5% of deaths in Canada, according to federal government data.

In 2024, the vast majority – around 96% - had a death deemed "reasonably foreseeable", due to severe medical conditions such as cancer.

In a small minority of assisted-death cases, patients may not have been terminally ill, but sought to end their lives due to a long and complicated illness that had significantly impacted their quality of life.

Canada is among a few countries that have introduced assisted-dying laws in the past decade. Others include Australia, New Zealand, Spain and Austria.

While eligibility for Maid in Canada is established federally, provinces are responsible for the delivery and regulation of healthcare.

In Canada, people over 18 must meet several requirements to be eligible for assisted dying.

They include having a "serious and incurable illness", making a "voluntary request that is not the result of external pressure" and being in an "advanced state of irreversible decline in capability".

Two independent doctors or nurse practitioners must then assess the patient to confirm that all of the eligibility requirements are met.

Moira Wilson, president of Inclusion Canada, a national organisation that works to support people with intellectual disabilities, said in a statement that they welcomed the proposed legislation in Alberta and urged other provinces to follow suit.

It "demonstrates that governments can strengthen laws and better protect people whose lives are not nearing an end", she said.

"We urge the federal government to review Canada's Maid law and ensure the same level of protection exists for people with disabilities across the country."

The legislation also garnered support from Mara Grunau, chief executive of the Canadian Mental Health Association's Alberta division, who said in a statement that "Recovery from mental illness and suicidality is possible, expected even".

"For that reason, we welcome the steps Alberta is taking to strengthen protections for those experiencing mental illness," added Grunau, who also leads the Centre for Suicide Prevention.

But supporters of expanded access to Maid criticised the proposal. Helen Long, chief executive of Dying with Dignity Canada, called the legislation a "direct attempt to circumvent the constitutional criminal law authority" and said it limits patient autonomy.

She told the BBC in a statement that she believes it creates "additional barriers for individuals who are suffering and who wish to exercise choice".

A Canadian woman was offered MAiD euthanasia for back pain at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH):

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/i-did-not-want-to-die-miriam-lancaster-medical-assistance-in-dying

This B.C. woman was offered MAID before other treatments. She said no to death and went on to climb a volcano
The doctor 'came in and said, "Miriam, I understand you’re in a lot of pain. We can offer you MAID." Just like that,' the woman's daughter said
By Sharon Kirkey - March 27, 2026

When she was taken by ambulance to a Vancouver hospital with lower back pain the likes of which she’d never experienced, the last thing 84-year-old Miriam Lancaster said she was thinking of was “cashing my chips.”

Lancaster had a fractured sacrum, a break in a bone at the base of the spine that’s connected to the pelvis. She and her daughter, Jordan Weaver, allege that, while still in the emergency department, a young doctor at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) raised the option of a medically assisted death.

“(The doctor) came in and said, ‘Miriam, I understand you’re in a lot of pain. We can offer you MAID.’ Just like that,” Weaver said.

“My mother and I are practicing Catholics. We would never accept MAID under any circumstances.”

Only when they answered with a firm “no” were other treatment options raised, the family said.

“The doctor said, ‘Well, you could get rehab, but it will be a long road, and it will be very difficult; we don’t know what to expect,’” Weaver said.

Lancaster chose rehabilitation. She was admitted to hospital and, after 10 days at VGH, followed by “three weeks and a bit” at UBC Hospital’s rehab program, recovered well, she said. Six weeks after the fracture last April, she walked her daughter down the aisle at her wedding. She later travelled to Cuba (before the U.S. oil blockade), Mexico and, most recently, walked and rode on horseback up Guatemala’s Pacaya volcano.

I did not want to die

“My mother is not frail. She climbed a volcano in Guatemala,” Weaver said. “She’s a dynamo. She reads books. She goes to the theatre. She’s alert. She takes the public bus on her own. She’s active. Her life is valuable to the people who care for her.”

In a video posted on X, Lancaster said she was taken aback when she said MAID was raised in the VGH emergency department last April. “That was the last thing on my mind. I just wanted to find out why I was in pain,” she said.

“I did not want to die.”

Whether doctors should initiate a discussion around MAID unsolicited, without patients first bringing it up, has become a subject of growing debate. Alberta is seeking to prohibit doctors from raising the topic of MAID as an option under its sweeping Last Resort Termination of Life Act.

“Many MAID providers act in good faith,” Dr. Ramona Coelho, a member of the Ontario Chief Coroner’s MAID death review committee wrote last month in a letter published by the British Medical Journal.

“The concern is not only individual intention, but that systems shape clinical behaviour,” Coelho said. “When death is offered alongside, and sometimes before, comprehensive care, medicine drifts from its commitment to healing and accompaniment through suffering.”

The video of Lancaster, posted on X by euthanasia opponent Amanda Achtman, has been viewed more than 312,000 times.

In a statement to National Post, Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) said it “is committed to the health and safety of everyone in our care.

“While VCH is limited in what we can say due to patient privacy and confidentiality, we are not aware of a conversation between the patient and emergency department physicians at Vancouver General Hospital related to Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID),” the statement said.

Under current MAID guidelines, “staff may consider bringing up MAID based on their clinical judgement, provided they possess the necessary knowledge and skills to do so,” VCH added.

While staff are responsible for answering questions when patients bring up MAID, emergency department “staff are not generally in a position to raise the topic of MAID with patients.”

“We strongly encourage those who are concerned about their care to connect with our Patient Care Quality Office.”

Canada’s MAID law requires two medical practitioners to agree that the person has a serious disease or disability causing unbearable physical or psychological suffering and is in an advanced and irreversible state of decline.

Lancaster isn’t an activist. In an interview, she said she didn’t lodge a complaint with the hospital because “I wanted to forget about the whole incident and just get on with my life. I really didn’t want to hang people out to dry.”

Her husband died from metastatic cancer in 2023. Ten days before his death, he collapsed at home and was rushed by ambulance to Vancouver General Hospital, where Lancaster said a doctor told the family he was required by law to offer her husband MAID.

“Of course, he turned it down,” she said. “We are churchgoers. We both are ready to go when the Lord calls us, and that’s what happened to him.”

“I had already seen that MAID gets presented pretty quickly, in this day and age. But I was a lot healthier. He had cancer,” Lancaster said. She was also under the impression that doctors are required to raise MAID, which she said she only recently learned isn’t the case.

She stressed that she was well cared for at both the VGH and UBC hospital. “I am making the most of the good work the hospitals did do in seeing that my spine was repaired,” mostly through bed rest and gradual exercise, she said. “Much of the repair is the body doing the repair, because they can’t do surgery on a spinal problem like I had.

“So, again, no complaints about how I was looked after, with the exception of the MAID invitation.”

She said she agreed to share her story after hearing Achtman describe similar experiences during a talk she gave on the Catholic perspective on MAID at a Victoria church in early March.

Lancaster said many of her friends are pro-MAID. “I have friends who have used MAID.” While she and her daughter have their own strong views about MAID, “it is a legal option in Canada that may work for some people, and I respect that,” Weaver said.

“It’s just the timing,” said Lancaster, a retired piano teacher. “Especially coming into emergency — a patient is already upset and disoriented and wishing they weren’t there.

“To give them a decision, a life-terminating decision, when they are in this condition, that’s what I object to.”

A 2024 survey by Angus Reid in partnership with Cardus found that Canadians are equally split on whether people would feel pressured to choose death if a doctor raised MAID with them.

Guidance from Canada’s MAID assessors and providers states that doctors may have a professional duty to bring up “care options that may relieve suffering” for people with a grievous and irremediable illness, disease or disability. The intention isn’t to induce, persuade or convince, the document states, but to inform.

“But to be offered MAID right off the bat for a non-life-threatening condition? It was a matter of pain management; the bone would eventually heal,” Weaver said.

“Just because someone is 84 does not mean they’re ready to go on the scrap heap of life. It’s an insult to seniors.”

Lancaster said the pain hit the moment she got out of bed one morning last April and put her foot on the floor. The bone had fractured not from a fall, but from her underlying osteoporosis.

“Jordan came into the room. She heard me call out in pain. She’d never seen me looking like that, so she phoned the ambulance.”

Lancaster was taken to the ER around 10 a.m. She said that it’s “my recollection” that the subject of MAID was brought up early, “really about the first thing.”

However, she was in pain and immediately given strong painkillers.

“My mother’s story, and I respect it’s her story, is that as soon as she went in, she was offered MAID,” Weaver said. “It was a terrible day for her — she was in shock, she was in pain and she was heavily drugged.” She was also back in the same emergency room where her husband had been taken before he died.

Weaver’s recollection is that they had been in emergency for “multiple hours” and had received the diagnosis of the fractured sacrum “when a doctor came to us to offer care options. And the first option was MAID.

“Only when we said no to MAID, did they offer admission to acute care at VGH, followed by UBC for rehab,” Weaver said.

It was pretty demeaning to be offered MAID immediately, as a care plan

“It was pretty demeaning to be offered MAID immediately, as a care plan,” she said.

“I’m not here to point fingers at medical professionals and individuals. It’s the culture in general that disturbs me,” Weaver said.

“She was still in emergency; she had not yet been put on the ward. It was as if they didn’t want to put her on the ward. As if she wasn’t worth being treated. Is this what we have come to?”

Hundreds posted comments on social media in response to the video.

“I won’t get into how unsurprised I am that this happened at VGH,” wrote policy analyst and disability rights activist Gabrielle Peters. “I’m so happy that Miriam told them to get lost. You shouldn’t need to be a spitfire like Miriam not to be put to death but in my experience the quiet, nice and less confident folks struggle in these situations.”

Others said “being offered something is very different from encouraging, pushing, menacing, etc. People wanted (MAID) to be readily available, so let’s make adjustments and keep things in perspective.”

“My only knowledge of anyone receiving MAID comes from a hospital in (northern) Alberta,” Saskatchewan farmer Pat Kunz wrote. “He had terminal cancer. HE HAD TO ASK! Staff there are not allowed to initiate the conversation.”

But Weaver said her mother was not in an end-of-life situation.

“What’s next? If we’re going to euthanize people who are in pain, if we’re going to euthanize seniors, where does it stop?”

A Catholic priest recovering from a broken hip was offered MAiD euthanasia at the very same Vancouver General Hospital (VGH):

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-catholic-priest-says-he-was-offered-euthanasia-twice-in-hospital/

Canadian Catholic priest says he was offered euthanasia twice in hospital
79-year-old Fr. Larry Holland, who broke his hip last year, told the doctor that he was morally opposed to assisted suicide, but the doctor and a nurse kept pressing it to him.
By Anthony Murdoch - April 30, 2026

VANCOUVER, British Columbia (LifeSiteNews) — A Canadian Catholic priest says that he was twice offered euthanasia while recovering in hospital from a hip fracture, noting that he was “very shocked” that he was asked about the procedure, which has become rampant in Canada.

Seventy-nine-year-old Father Larry Holland, from the Archdiocese of Vancouver, recalled in a recent interview posted by the diocese’s publication, the B.C. Catholic, that he was twice offered an option to, in essence, take his own life with the help of medical staff.

“There are some things you just don’t talk about to some people,” he said, adding, “I think I was very shocked.”

Holland said that euthanasia is “such a sensitive subject” after a doctor told him about so-called “Medical Assistance in Dying” (“MAiD”), as it’s known, as an option should his recovery go downhill.

Holland broke his hip after falling in the bathroom on Christmas Day. He noted that he is not currently dying, despite being in the hospital, was not dying right after he broke his hip. He is now recovering at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH).

The priest recalled how he could not believe that he was asked about assisted suicide despite staff at VGH knowing that he is a Catholic priest. He said he fell “kind of silent” after being asked by the doctor, who said that assisted suicide is “something they have to discuss with someone who’s been given a terminal diagnosis.”

Holland told the doctor that he was morally opposed to assisted suicide, but the doctor kept pressing it as an option.

After a few weeks, a nurse offered it to him again, claiming that it was a form of “compassion.”

The priest noted that, in reality, euthanasia is “a false compassion, really.”

According to Vancouver Coastal Health, which runs VGH, as noted by the B.C. Catholic, staff may “consider bringing up MAiD based on their clinical judgment, provided they possess the necessary knowledge and skills to do so.”

Coastal Health also said staff are “responsible for answering questions when patients bring up the topic of MAiD.”

Holland said that, even when offered assisted suicide, he could “feel the temptation,” calling it a “human reaction,” as “We always look for the easy way out.”

However, he said that turning down such a deadly offer only strengthens a person more and that going through pain “can encourage growth.”

“It can motivate you, it can open up new worlds, new vistas, new opportunities,” he said.

The Liberal government under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and now Mark Carney has worked to expand euthanasia 13-fold since it was legalized in 2016. Canada now has the fastest-growing assisted suicide program in the world. Meanwhile, Health Canada has released a series of studies on advanced requests for assisted suicide.

The expansion of euthanasia for the mentally ill is slated to become law in 2027 as a consequence of the passage of Bill C-7.

As reported by LifeSiteNews, Canada’s Catholic bishops have said that they “support” Bill C-218, which is a bill that would stop the planned expansion of assisted suicide.

However, Canadian psychiatrist Dr. John Maher recently told MPs that he personally saw patients with mental illness offered state-sanctioned assisted suicide in violation of the country’s current euthanasia laws.

Offering assisted suicide places that person in ‘role of the devil,’ says archdiocese’s pro-life chaplain
When news of what happened reached the ears of Father Larry Lynn, the archdiocese’s pro-life chaplain, it was a shock.

“This must surely be among the most appalling examples of Canada’s coercive and insensitive euthanasia regime,” said Lynn.

Lynn noted that medical practitioners offering assisted suicide to a person is bad enough, but especially when they know that a person is a religious and known to oppose the deadly practice.

“It places the medical practitioner into the role of the devil, tempting a vulnerable person into mortal sin,” he said.

Lynn noted that he is concerned that pro-euthanasia groups, such as the Canadian Association of MAiD Assessors and Providers, are trying to talk to Catholics about the procedure. He noted how a new document that they have brings this issue up.

The document reads: “Health care professionals may draw incorrect assumptions about a person’s views on MAiD; e.g., they may assume that a patient objects to MAiD because she is a Roman Catholic nun, and yet Roman Catholic nuns and others dedicated to a faith-based way of life have requested MAiD.”

There is no source for the booklet given, and Lynn called it “diabolical” that a nun is used as an example.

When it comes to assisted suicide, the province of British Columbia, under socialist NDP rule, has seen the practice skyrocket.

This has led to the province’s Catholic-based Providence Health Care being engaged in a legal battle with the government in court for a case in which the outcome will decide whether or not faith-based healthcare facilities will be forced to offer state-sanctioned euthanasia.

Euthanasia is now the sixth-highest cause of death in Canada, after it was not listed in Statistics Canada’s top 10 leading causes of death from 2019 to 2022.

There is now a thriving black market in suicide drugs in Canada and other countries.  No mention of the United States in this BBC post, but there have been rumors:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c70vg7glglyo

Canadian 'poison seller' pleads guilty to aiding suicides by selling toxic chemical online
By Sean Dilley, Christina McSorley, and Olivia Ireland - 29 May 2026

A man has pleaded guilty to 14 counts of aiding suicides in Canada after he sold toxic chemicals online.

Kenneth Law, 60, entered the guilty pleas relating to Canadian victims in an Ontario court on Friday, as part of a deal with prosecutors who withdrew more serious murder charges.

Authorities said the former chef also sold about 1,200 packages of the toxic substances to recipients - who he met in online suicide forums - in 40 countries, including the UK.

Families of British victims have said they are angry with UK prosecutors for not charging Law, who is linked to the deaths of 79 Britons. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the Canadian legal system will take the losses of UK families into account.

A letter from the CPS, seen by the BBC, said Law would not face charges in the UK because of legal complexities.

Specialist CPS prosecutor Andrew Hudson said including UK victims in the Canadian sentencing process was the "quickest and most effective route" to securing justice.

Hudson said a successful extradition was "far from guaranteed and would have taken years to conclude", and there was a risk if he was extradited that any prosecution "could have been blocked under double jeopardy principles".

He added: "A condition of our agreement with the Canadian prosecutor was that Kenneth Law's sentence must reflect the fact that people died in England and Wales as a direct result of using products that he supplied to them.

"No victim has been left behind as part of this process."

Law was also linked to the death of five people in Scotland and one in Northern Ireland.

Ontario man Ashtyn Prosser-Blake, 19, was one of Law's victims who died by suicide in March 2023.

"He was just such a super happy, really gentle soul, always looking to stand up for the underdog, the kids that got picked on," his mother Kim Prosser told the BBC.

Prosser-Blake's mental health declined after Covid - when he graduated he went to college for a year in Toronto before dropping out and moved home where he "just continued to struggle" before dying by suicide, his mother said.

"The pain of losing my son Ashtyn doesn't ease because someone sits behind bars," she said. "There is no solace in my healing journey to see someone else suffer."

In the UK, David Parfett's 22 year-old son, Thomas, used the substance said to have been sold to him by Law.

"Tom was somebody who really saw the joy in life. He would find humour in the weirdest places. I often think about his laugh," Parfett said.

"Tom was a massive football fan and he was a good footballer as well. I miss the opportunity to enjoy the 2026 World Cup with him."

Tom paid the equivalent of £50 ($67; C$92) for the substance. His body was found in a hotel in Sunbury-on-Thames, Surrey, in 2021.

David Parfett remembers his son Thomas, who died in 2021, as someone who "really saw the joy in life". Parfett said: "I had wanted Law to face charges in the UK... he really needed to face justice over here."

Parfett is calling on the UK government to hold a public inquiry into the deaths.

"I think that a public inquiry is needed because we need action across multiple government departments and unfortunately, we are not seeing that coordination and that understanding of how to address the problem today," he said.

"Fundamentally, the government is failing in its duty to protect life."

The BBC has approached the Home Office for comment.

Law was charged with 14 counts of aiding suicides in Canada and 14 counts of murder following his arrest in 2023.

His capture followed a complex investigation by at least 11 law-enforcement agencies and involved investigators from around a dozen countries, including the UK, Italy and the US.

Law was arrested in May 2023, a week after a Times investigation alleged he was selling poison to young people.

In the Times investigation, a journalist posed as a customer and spoke with Law directly.

During that conversation, Law reportedly counselled the journalist on how to use his products to "best ensure death", according to The Times.

Canadian detectives told the BBC in 2023 that Law ran multiple websites offering equipment and substances to help people end their lives.

Thomas Parfett was described by his father as a "massive football fan".  Earlier, Law's lawyer Matthew Gourlay confirmed to the BBC his client would plead guilty to aiding suicide under a deal with crown prosecutors that would result in the more serious murder charges withdrawn.

Those found guilty of aiding suicide under Canada's criminal code can face up to 14 years in prison.

Mark Atwood has created a year-by-year 40 year structural projection of the consequences of MAiD (Medical Assistance in Dying) on Canada, its economy, its demographics, and its health care system.  It is always perilous to look out that far ahead, but he makes some very interesting observations which should be valid, regardless of how Canada's political class proceeds with MAiD.

Note, this is a long post which takes some time to digest:

https://markatwood.substack.com/p/the-peculiar-institution

The Peculiar Institution

What happens when a state builds a medical system it can’t afford and a killing mechanism it can’t stop. A 40-year projection.

March 07, 2026

 

 

Canada has killed 76,000 of its own citizens through MAID since 2016. More than every US mass shooting death combined, 44 times over. This is the “good” path. I ran the math on what comes next.

---

I work in systems. I trace incentive gradients for a living. When I see a system where every actor is following rational incentives and the aggregate outcome is monstrous, I don’t look for a villain. I look for the structural loop that makes the monstrosity self-reinforcing. Then I ask whether anything in the current policy environment breaks the loop.

If nothing breaks the loop, the system runs until it consumes its inputs.

Canada has built a loop.

The loop works like this: the healthcare system costs more than the government will fund. The gap between what patients need and what the system provides creates suffering. The suffering creates eligibility for Medical Assistance in Dying. MAID resolves the suffering by killing the patient. The dead patient no longer requires expensive care. The savings reduce the fiscal pressure to fund healthcare. Reduced funding widens the gap. The wider gap creates more suffering. More suffering creates more MAID eligibility.

Every step in this loop is legal, “voluntary”, and described by its operators as compassionate. No step requires conspiracy or malice. Each actor (the politician, the administrator, the practitioner, the patient) is doing something defensible in isolation. The aggregate effect is a healthcare system that is resolving its own funding crisis by reducing the population it serves.

The numbers are not speculative. They’re from Health Canada’s own annual reports and the Parliamentary Budget Officer’s published cost analyses. 16,499 Canadians were killed by MAID in 2024. 5.1% of all deaths. The PBO calculated that the program saves the government $149 million per year. Eligibility has expanded twice since legalization (Bill C-7 in 2021 removed the requirement that death be “reasonably foreseeable”; mental illness as sole condition is scheduled for March 2027). The expansion to mental illness has been delayed three times. Not cancelled. Delayed.

I wanted to know what happens if the loop isn’t broken. Not the optimistic projection where Canada reforms its healthcare system and restricts MAID to the terminally ill. The other one. The one where the current incentives continue operating and nobody with the power to change them does.

So I ran it out. Forty years. Year by year. Using published fiscal data, demographic projections, healthcare spending trends, MAID growth rates, emigration patterns, and the structural constraints of Canadian federalism. No external shocks. No wars, no pandemics, no financial crises. This is the best case. Just the math, compounding.

The result is not a prediction. It’s a projection: if these incentives continue, this is what they produce. Every projection is wrong in its specifics. The question is whether the structural dynamics are right. I think they are.

I should flag my confidence levels. The near-term numbers (2026-2032) are high-confidence. They’re built on published budget projections, known demographic data, and MAID growth rates that have been consistent for years. The mid-term (2033-2045) is medium-confidence. The structural dynamics are sound but the magnitudes could vary significantly depending on variables I can’t model (political shifts, provincial policy divergence, practitioner supply elasticity). The long-term (2045-2065) is a structural sketch, not a forecast. It describes where the incentives point, not where Canada will necessarily arrive.

What I’m most confident about is the ratchet. The self-reinforcing loop where healthcare funding pressure produces MAID eligibility and MAID uptake reduces the pressure to fund healthcare. That mechanism is already operating. It doesn’t need to be activated. It is already activated. It needs to be interrupted. Nothing in current Canadian policy interrupts it.

One more thing before the timeline. Someone will read the cumulative numbers (the projection reaches 4 million MAID deaths by 2065) and say this is hysterical, alarmist, impossible. I want to note that in 2016, when MAID was legalized for the terminally ill under strict safeguards, anyone projecting 76,000 deaths and 5.1% of all mortality within nine years would have been called hysterical and alarmist. The projections that turned out to be wrong were the conservative ones. Every official estimate of MAID uptake has been revised upward. Every eligibility boundary has been expanded. The system has moved in one direction, at one speed, for nine years.

I’m not predicting that it will continue. I’m observing that nothing has changed that would cause it to stop.

Some Canadians I’ve spoken to about this have started using a phrase that I suspect will stick: they call MAID a “peculiar institution.” The reference is deliberate and it is structural, not rhetorical. The antebellum South built an economy that depended on a system everyone privately knew was monstrous but that nobody with fiscal power had an incentive to dismantle. The institution was defended on moral grounds (paternalism, civilizing mission, biblical sanction) while the actual mechanism was economic: the plantation system could not function without it. The people who could have changed it found it easier to look away or to leave than to bear the cost of dismantling something the economy depended on.

Canada is building the same structure with a different input. Not forced labor. Managed death. The economic dependency is the same: the fiscal system increasingly cannot function without the continued and expanding operation of the program. The moral defense is the same shape (autonomy, dignity, compassion performs the same function that paternalism, civilization, and scripture performed: making the monstrous sound principled). The criticism shield is the same (you’re attacking patient rights, as once it was you’re attacking property rights). The exit valve is the same: emigrate rather than reform.

The South’s peculiar institution didn’t end because the South reformed. It ended because an external force made it end, at a cost so catastrophic the region took a century to recover.

The projection that follows assumes no external force. This is the gentle version. The path where nothing goes wrong except everything that’s already going wrong continuing at the rate it’s already going wrong.

This is what the math says happens when a country builds a healthcare system it can’t afford to run and a killing mechanism it can’t afford to stop.

---

What follows is a year-by-year structural projection in two parts: 2026-2045 and 2045-2065. The assumptions, data sources, and confidence levels are stated at the top. Read the assumptions first. If you disagree with the inputs, the outputs won’t persuade you. If you agree with the inputs, the outputs won’t comfort you.

---

Canada 2026-2045: Incentive-Driven Projection

Assumptions and Inputs

 

Starting conditions (2025-26):

• Federal deficit: ~$78B (2.5% GDP), projected to decline to $57B by 2029-30 under optimistic assumptions

• Federal debt: $1.27T, debt-to-GDP ~41%

• Healthcare spending: $399B (12.7% GDP), growing 4-7% annually

• Healthcare wait times: 28.6 weeks GP-to-treatment (208% longer than 1993)

• MAID deaths: ~16,500/year (5.1% of all deaths), growing ~7% annually

• MAID fiscal savings: ~$149M/year (PBO estimate, likely conservative as eligibility expands)

• Population: ~41M, aging rapidly (seniors 23% by 2030)

• Oil revenue: declining investment, policy-driven production constraints

• Immigration: policy reversal underway (reduced intake after 2023-24 surge of 3% population growth)

• Real per capita public healthcare spending: negative growth in 2024 (-1.4%)

• Disability support: below poverty line in most provinces ($705-$1,685/month)

Structural constraints:

• Single-payer healthcare with no private alternative (Canada Health Act)

• Provincial delivery, federal transfer funding (CHT)

• No constitutional right to healthcare

• MAID is a guaranteed service; palliative care is not

• PBO gives only 7.5% probability that deficit-to-GDP ratio declines as planned

---

Year-by-Year Projection

Phase 1: Fiscal Tightening Meets Demographic Acceleration (2026-2030)

 

2026

• Federal deficit: ~$70B. Budget 2025 spending ramps hit. Trade war with US ongoing.

• Healthcare: spending grows 4-5% but population aging accelerates demand faster. Real per capita spending flat or negative. Wait times hold at 28-30 weeks.

• MAID: ~17,500 deaths. Mental illness expansion delayed to March 2027. Quebec already processing advance directive requests (1,400+ approved by end of 2025). Track 2 continues 15-17% annual growth.

• MAID savings: ~$160M. Still “negligible” in official framing.

• Energy: Oil production stable but investment declining. Carbon tax federal fuel charge eliminated April 2025 but provincial equivalents persist. Alberta equalization grievance intensifies.

• Immigration: intake reduced from 500K+ to ~300K. GDP growth slows. Tax base growth slows with it. Per-capita GDP continues declining (ongoing since 2022).

2027

• MAID for mental illness as sole condition becomes legal (March, unless delayed again). This is the inflection point. The eligible population expands by an order of magnitude.

• Federal deficit: ~$65B. Government claims trajectory is improving. Debt-to-GDP creeps to 43%.

• Healthcare: wait times worsen to 30-35 weeks in most provinces. New Brunswick, PEI, Nova Scotia approach 50+ weeks. Real per capita spending still flat. Physician shortage intensifies (only 8% practice rural).

• MAID: ~20,000-22,000 deaths. Mental illness expansion adds significant new volume. Track 2 grows 20%+. Practitioners: the 102-person cohort administering 60+ deaths/year each grows, but not proportionally. Concentration of killing in a small practitioner pool deepens.

• MAID savings: ~$200-250M. Starts showing up in provincial budget analyses as a line item worth managing.

• Key dynamic: every person who receives MAID instead of long-term mental health treatment saves the system $50K-$200K in lifetime care costs. The fiscal incentive to approve rather than treat is now structurally embedded.

2028

• Federal deficit: ~$60B (optimistic) to $70B (realistic). Debt-to-GDP: 43-44%. PBO’s 35% probability of debt ratio declining is looking generous.

• Healthcare: $430-450B. Seniors now 21-22% of population. Hospital bed ratio (2.49/1000, already among lowest in OECD) continues declining relative to demand. Wait times: 32-38 weeks nationally.

• MAID: ~24,000-26,000. Mental illness track operational for 12+ months. First wave of data shows what everyone suspects: recipients are disproportionately poor, isolated, and undertreated. Media covers individual cases. Government commissions reviews. Reviews recommend better safeguards. Safeguards are procedural (more forms, more consultations) not structural (more housing, more care).

• Provincial dynamics: Quebec leads at 7-8% of all deaths. BC close behind. Ontario lower but volume is highest. Alberta resists but is structurally constrained by the same healthcare shortages.

• Energy: global energy transition politics intensify. Canadian oil investment continues declining. Differential between WCS and WTI widens. Alberta’s fiscal position weakens despite oil remaining the country’s most durable export revenue.

2029

• Budget 2025’s “balanced operating budget by 2028-29” target: missed. Government redefines fiscal anchor (again).

• Healthcare spending: approaching $450-470B. 13%+ of GDP. Provinces begin making harder rationing decisions. Palliative care funding remains discretionary while MAID remains guaranteed.

• MAID: ~28,000-30,000. 6-7% of all deaths. Canada now unambiguously the world’s highest per-capita euthanasia rate. International criticism from UN, disability rights organizations intensifies. Government responds with data reports emphasizing “patient autonomy” and “informed consent.”

• The structural trap is now visible: MAID growth reduces the political constituency for healthcare investment. Dead people don’t wait in line. Every MAID death is one fewer patient in the wait time statistics. The wait time problem “improves” partly through mortality selection.

2030

• Seniors: 23% of population. Healthcare demand peak begins (and won’t crest for 20 years).

• Federal deficit: $55-70B depending on economic conditions. Debt-to-GDP: 43-45%. Debt service: $75-80B/year (2.1-2.3% GDP). Interest payments now exceed defense spending.

• MAID: ~32,000-35,000. Advance directives (Quebec model) spreading to other provinces. First cases of dementia patients killed under advance directives generate public controversy but no policy reversal.

• Healthcare: real per capita spending has been flat or negative for 6 years running. The system is not deteriorating. It has deteriorated. The deterioration is the new baseline.

• MAID savings: ~$350-500M/year. No longer negligible by anyone’s math. Provincial treasuries now structurally depend on MAID volume to manage healthcare budget projections.

---

Phase 2: The Ratchet (2031-2037)

2031-2033

• The ratchet mechanism engages. Each year:

  • Healthcare underfunding produces more suffering

  • More suffering produces more MAID eligibility

  • More MAID reduces the patient population requiring expensive care

  • Reduced patient population reduces political pressure to fund care

  • Reduced funding produces more suffering

• MAID: 35,000-45,000/year by 2033. 8-10% of all deaths. Cumulative total since legalization passes 200,000.

• “Mature minor” debate begins in earnest. Quebec or BC likely to pilot. First cases of 16-17 year olds requesting MAID for chronic conditions.

• Practitioner normalization complete. MAID is now a routine medical service, not an exceptional one. Medical schools include it in curriculum. Specialization develops. The professional class the raw material document predicted has fully formed: assessors, providers, coordinators, trainers, researchers, ethicists. All employed. All billing.

• Energy: Canadian oil production declining 2-4% annually as investment drought compounds. Provincial revenues in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland structurally impaired. Federal equalization pressure increases.

• Immigration: net fiscal contribution of post-2020 immigration cohorts becomes measurable. The data is unflattering. Per-capita GDP continues its decline. Housing costs remain structurally elevated. The immigrants Canada attracted during the 2022-2024 surge are disproportionately in healthcare-consuming rather than healthcare-providing roles.

2034-2037

• Federal debt-to-GDP: 45-50%. Budget 2025’s “long-term projection” of debt declining by mid-2030s: not happening.

• Healthcare: $550-650B. 14-15% GDP. System is consuming the federal budget. Provincial healthcare spending crowds out every other priority. Infrastructure, education, and social services decline in real terms.

• MAID: 45,000-60,000/year. 10-14% of all deaths. Advance directives are standard. Mental illness track is mature. The conversation about “completed life” (euthanasia for elderly people who are not sick but are “done”) is active. Netherlands is debating it. Canada is doing it under the “frailty” category (BC already was in 2024, at 35% of euthanasia deaths attributed to “other conditions,” of which 66% were frailty).

• Wait times: 40-50+ weeks in most provinces outside Ontario. The system functions as a triage operation: emergencies are treated, everything else waits. The wait itself becomes a MAID eligibility driver (your condition deteriorates while waiting, deterioration creates “irremediable” suffering, suffering qualifies you for MAID).

• The productive class begins to notice. High-earning Canadians (the ones funding the system through taxation) increasingly access private care outside Canada (US, medical tourism) or through emerging grey-market domestic private clinics. The public system becomes a system for people who can’t leave it. The people who can’t leave it are the people most likely to be offered MAID.

• Brain drain accelerates. Canadian physicians, engineers, and tech workers increasingly relocate to the US. The tax differential (Canadian top marginal rates already among highest in OECD) compounds with quality-of-life deterioration. Each departure reduces the tax base that funds the system.

---

Phase 3: The Fork (2038-2045)

Two scenarios diverge here. The fork depends on whether the productive class acts before or after the system reaches terminal velocity.

Scenario A: Reform (the productive class sees what’s happening by ~2038)

• Political realignment. A party or coalition runs explicitly on: healthcare privatization (parallel private system), MAID restriction (reversal to terminal-illness-only), energy production restoration, immigration fiscal accountability.

• This platform is politically toxic in 2026. By 2038, after 200,000+ MAID deaths, 50-week wait times, and a decade of declining per-capita GDP, it becomes electorally viable.

• Reform takes 5-7 years to implement. Private healthcare infrastructure doesn’t build overnight. Physician supply takes a decade to rebuild. Energy investment takes 3-5 years to restart after regulatory certainty is restored.

• MAID deaths plateau and decline to 15,000-20,000/year by 2045 (still high by international standards, but back to roughly terminal-illness cases).

• Cumulative MAID deaths 2016-2045: ~500,000-600,000.

• Canada emerges economically damaged but structurally recoverable. Debt-to-GDP: 50-55%. Comparable to post-WWII, requiring a generation of fiscal discipline to unwind.

Scenario B: Inertia (the productive class leaves instead of fighting)

• No political realignment. The professional-managerial class that benefits from the current structure (healthcare administrators, MAID practitioners, government employees, academic researchers) maintains policy capture.

• Brain drain accelerates to crisis levels. Canada loses 50,000-100,000 high-income taxpayers per decade to the US, UK, Australia.

• Tax base erosion forces further healthcare cuts. Further cuts produce more MAID eligibility. The ratchet continues.

• MAID: 70,000-90,000/year by 2045. 15-20% of all deaths. Canada becomes the first developed nation where state-administered death is a top-5 cause of mortality by volume (even though Health Canada will still insist it’s not a “cause of death”).

• Cumulative MAID deaths 2016-2045: ~800,000-1,000,000.

• Federal debt-to-GDP: 60-70%+. Credit rating downgrade (AAA lost, probably by late 2030s). Borrowing costs increase, compounding the fiscal spiral.

• At some point in this scenario, the system produces an outcome so grotesque it forces external intervention. A child killed under mature minor provisions. A mass-media case of someone killed who was clearly treatable. A whistleblower from the practitioner cohort. Something breaks the aesthetic frame that has protected the program.

• But by then the institutional infrastructure (practitioners, trainers, assessors, ethicists, administrators) is a $2-3B/year industry with its own lobbying capacity, its own academic journals, its own professional associations. Dismantling it is a decommissioning project, not a policy change.

---

Key Variables That Determine Which Fork

 

1. US trade relationship. If the US continues economic pressure on Canada, Scenario B accelerates (brain drain, fiscal pressure). If normalized, Scenario A becomes more plausible (economic breathing room for reform).

2. Energy policy reversal. If a future government restores oil/gas investment, Alberta and Saskatchewan fiscal positions recover, reducing federal transfer pressure. This is the single largest revenue lever Canada has.

3. Healthcare privatization. If Canada allows a parallel private tier (as most European universal systems do), the pressure valve releases. People who can pay get care. People who can’t still wait, but the MAID-as-pressure-valve function is reduced because the political class is no longer personally affected by wait times.

4. MAID practitioner supply. If the practitioner pool doesn’t grow proportionally, there’s a natural throughput constraint. 102 practitioners doing 60 deaths/year each is already a capacity question. But capacity constraints have never survived fiscal incentives for long.

5. International pressure. The UN has already flagged Canada’s program. If major trading partners (EU, UK) begin treating Canadian MAID as a human rights issue, the diplomatic cost changes the calculus.

6. Demographic math. By 2035, the baby boom is dying. Whether they die with palliative care, MAID, or in hospital waiting rooms is the fiscal question that determines everything else. The generation that built the system will be consumed by it.

---

The Bottom Line

Canada’s three fiscal pressures (healthcare costs, immigration fiscal drag, energy revenue suppression) converge on one output: a state that cannot afford to care for its population and has built a legal mechanism to resolve that gap by killing the people it can’t afford to treat.

The mechanism is self-reinforcing. It requires no conspiracy, no malice, and no central direction. It requires only that each actor in the system follow their incentives: politicians avoid healthcare spending that produces deficits, administrators avoid wait time statistics that produce accountability, practitioners follow protocols that produce billable procedures, and patients “choose” the option that’s fast, free, and framed as dignified.

The system will continue until it runs out of people willing to die, or people willing to pay for others to live.

The current trajectory suggests it will run out of the second group first.

---

Scenario B Extended: 2045-2065, No External Shocks

Starting Conditions (end of 2045)

 

From the previous projection:

• Federal debt-to-GDP: ~65-70%

• MAID: ~80,000-90,000/year, 18-20% of all deaths

• Cumulative MAID deaths since 2016: ~850,000-1,000,000

• Healthcare: ~$750-800B, 15-16% GDP

• Population: ~43-44M (immigration offsetting emigration and below-replacement fertility)

• Median age: ~45

• Working-age share: declining for 20 years

• Seniors (65+): ~27% of population

• Emigration: ~130,000/year, skewing high-income and professional

• Physicians per capita: declining since early 2030s

• Wait times: 45-55 weeks nationally

• AAA credit rating: lost (~2038-2040)

• Parallel private healthcare: still illegal in law, widespread in practice

• MAID practitioner industry: ~$3-4B/year ecosystem (practitioners, assessors, coordinators, trainers, ethicists, researchers, administrators)

• Disability support: still below poverty line, no structural reform in 20 years

• Oil production: 60-70% of 2019 peak, declining 2-3%/year

---

Phase 4: Post-Demographic Peak (2045-2052)

The baby boom is dying. The leading edge turned 65 in 2011, 80 in 2026, 100 in 2046. The trailing edge (born 1964) turns 81 in 2045. This is the decade where the largest generation in Canadian history passes through the system. How they pass through determines everything.

2045-2047

Fiscal: Deficit $80-90B. Debt-to-GDP 68-72%. Debt service $110-120B (3%+ GDP). Canada borrows at 150-200bps above US treasuries (post-downgrade premium). Debt service is now the second-largest federal expenditure after transfers.

Healthcare: $800-850B (16% GDP). The system has bifurcated in practice:

• Urban Ontario and parts of BC: functional but strained. 25-30 week waits. Grey-market private clinics handle 15-20% of elective procedures (technically illegal, universally tolerated, politically untouchable because every MP and senior bureaucrat uses them).

• Atlantic provinces, rural prairies, northern territories: effective collapse of specialist care. Patients travel 500+ km for oncology, cardiology, neurology. Many don’t. Many choose MAID instead of the journey.

• Quebec: operates a de facto parallel system through its distinct regulatory framework. Wait times lower (20-25 weeks) but MAID rates highest in the country (10-12% of all deaths).

MAID: 85,000-95,000/year. 20-22% of all deaths. The boomer die-off means total deaths are at historic highs (~430,000-450,000/year), which makes the percentage look “stable” even as absolute numbers climb. This is the statistical illusion that sustains the program’s political viability: the rate plateaus while the body count peaks.

Advance directives now account for 20-25% of MAID deaths. Dementia is the primary driver. The ethical debates of 2030 are settled law. A person who signed a directive at 72 while competent is administered MAID at 84 while resisting, and the courts have held (repeatedly) that prior competent wishes override current incompetent objections.

Mature minor MAID is legal in Quebec and BC. Uptake is low (~50-100/year) but each case generates international headlines. Canada’s diplomatic position on human rights is increasingly untenable. Canada stops seeking seats on UN human rights bodies because the scrutiny is counterproductive.

Emigration: 140,000/year. The cohort leaving is now multigenerational: professionals who left in the 2030s have established lives abroad, and their extended families follow. The Canadian diaspora in the US reaches 2M+. These are not seasonal workers. They are permanent departures of the upper-middle class.

Tax base: Personal income tax revenue per capita has been declining in real terms since the mid-2030s. Corporate tax revenue declining as businesses relocate headquarters (the “mailbox move” to Delaware or Nevada for tax purposes while maintaining Canadian operations). The tax base is hollowing from the top while obligations grow from the bottom.

2048-2050

Fiscal: Deficit $85-100B. Debt-to-GDP 73-78%. Canada’s second credit downgrade (to A+ or equivalent). Borrowing costs increase another 50-75bps. The fiscal spiral is now self-reinforcing: higher borrowing costs increase the deficit, higher deficit increases debt, higher debt increases borrowing costs.

Healthcare: $880-950B (16.5-17% GDP). Healthcare is now consuming 42-45% of provincial budgets. Education spending per pupil has declined 15% in real terms since 2025. Infrastructure maintenance deficit estimated at $300B nationally. Roads, bridges, water systems degrading visibly in smaller cities and rural areas.

MAID: 90,000-100,000/year. The boomer peak is passing. Total deaths begin declining from their peak. MAID’s percentage share continues rising even as absolute numbers plateau, because non-MAID deaths are declining faster (the boomers who would have died of natural causes in hospital are instead dying of MAID at home or in clinics, which shows up as a shift in the death-type ratio).

Cumulative since 2016: 1.5-1.7M.

The workforce: Canada’s dependency ratio (non-working to working population) has worsened continuously for 25 years. The working-age population is now 58-59% of total (down from 66% in 2020). Each worker supports more dependents through taxation. The workers who remain are increasingly those who couldn’t leave (lower-skilled, place-bound, family-obligated) rather than those who chose to stay.

Key dynamic that emerges here: The healthcare system is now staffed disproportionately by immigrant-origin practitioners, many of whom trained in systems where euthanasia is illegal and culturally abhorrent. Practitioner refusal rates for MAID increase. Conscientious objection conflicts intensify. The system responds by creating dedicated MAID clinics staffed by willing practitioners, further concentrating the killing in a smaller pool and further normalizing it as a specialty rather than an exception.

2051-2052

Fiscal: Deficit $90-105B. Debt-to-GDP 78-83%. The federal government’s interest payments now exceed $140B/year. This is more than the entire healthcare transfer. Canada is paying more to service past borrowing than it is transferring to provinces for healthcare.

Healthcare: approaching $1T. The number is psychologically significant even if it’s just inflation compounding over 25 years. Real per capita spending has declined ~20% from its 2019 peak. The system delivers 2005-era care at 2052-era prices.

MAID: 95,000-105,000/year. The boomers are mostly gone. The generation that follows (Gen X, born 1965-1980) is smaller but has spent their entire late careers in a deteriorating system and has lower savings rates (they funded the boomers’ care through taxation). They are now 72-87 years old. Their MAID uptake rate is higher than the boomers’ was at equivalent ages, because they have fewer illusions about what the system will provide.

Population: 43M (net growth has slowed to near zero as immigration decline meets emigration increase). Median age: 47. Canada is now one of the oldest societies in the OECD, comparable to Japan and Italy but without their cultural infrastructure for elder care (multi-generational housing, family obligation norms).

---

Phase 5: The New Normal (2053-2060)

The demographic bulge has passed. The crisis should be easing. It doesn’t, because the infrastructure that was supposed to serve the next generation was never built. The 2030s and 2040s were spent managing the boomer die-off, not investing in the system that would serve Generation X and Millennials in their old age. The deferred maintenance is now deferred permanently. You don’t rebuild a healthcare system that was allowed to decay for 30 years. You build a new one. Canada isn’t building a new one.

2053-2055

Fiscal: Deficit stabilizes at $70-80B (less spending pressure as boomer obligations wind down). But debt-to-GDP is 80-85% and the interest burden is structural. Debt service: $150-160B. Even with reduced program spending, the accumulated debt prevents fiscal recovery.

Healthcare: $950B-1T (16% GDP, slightly declining as the patient population shrinks and the system right-sizes through attrition rather than investment). Hospital closures accelerate. Canada had 1,087 hospitals in 2025. By 2055, it has ~700. The closures are concentrated in rural and small-city Canada. Entire regions are healthcare deserts.

MAID: 80,000-85,000/year. Declining in absolute terms (smaller elderly cohort) but the percentage of all deaths continues rising because the system is now structurally optimized around MAID as the default end-of-life pathway. Palliative care capacity has declined in absolute terms (fewer hospices, fewer palliative specialists, fewer funded beds). For many Canadians, the only end-of-life care option with guaranteed access is MAID.

This is the inversion point: MAID was introduced as an alternative to palliative care. By 2055, palliative care is the alternative to MAID, and it’s the one you can’t access.

Cumulative since 2016: 2.2-2.5M. Roughly 5-6% of everyone who has lived in Canada since legalization.

The economy: Canada’s GDP per capita has declined ~25% relative to the US since 2022 (it was already 20-25% lower). The gap is now 40-45%. This is comparable to the gap between the US and Portugal or Greece. Canada is no longer a peer economy to the US, UK, or Australia. It is a mid-tier developed nation with a deteriorating capital stock and a shrinking productive workforce.

Energy: Oil sands production at 40% of 2019 peak. The remaining production is operated by skeleton crews with minimal new investment. The resource is still there. The capital and regulatory environment to extract it is not. Alberta’s fiscal position is dependent on federal transfers (a complete inversion from 2025, when Alberta was a net contributor).

2056-2060

Fiscal: Debt-to-GDP begins declining (82% to 75%) not because of fiscal discipline but because the obligations are dying. Literally. The boomer healthcare burden is winding down through mortality (both natural and MAID). The Millennial generation (now 60-79) is smaller, has lower chronic disease rates (slightly), and has spent their lives in a system that taught them not to expect care. They demand less because they were trained by the system to accept less.

Healthcare: $900-950B (declining in real terms). The system has reached a grim equilibrium: it provides emergency care, basic primary care in urban centers, and MAID. Everything in between (elective surgery, specialist consultation, diagnostic imaging, chronic disease management, mental health treatment, rehabilitation) is either private-pay, unavailable, or waitlisted beyond clinical relevance.

MAID: 70,000-75,000/year. 22-25% of all deaths. The percentage is the highest it’s ever been even though the absolute number has declined from peak. This is because the non-MAID death infrastructure has atrophied. Fewer people die in hospitals because there are fewer hospital beds. Fewer people die in hospices because there are fewer hospices. More people die by MAID because it’s the pathway the system maintained funding for while everything else was cut.

The MAID industry: Fully mature. Annual revenue $5-6B. Approximately 6,000 practitioners. Professional association (CAMAP or successor) is one of the most powerful healthcare lobbying organizations in the country. MAID training is a standard component of medical education. The ethical debates are over. The practice is as normalized as any other medical procedure. Young physicians who entered the profession in the 2040s have never known a system without it.

Population: 42M (declining). Net emigration exceeds net immigration for the first time. Canada is losing population. This is historically unprecedented for a developed nation not at war.

---

Phase 6: Terminal State (2061-2065)

2061-2063

 

Fiscal: Debt-to-GDP 70-72% (declining slowly). Deficit $50-60B. The fiscal picture looks better on paper because the obligations have been resolved through death rather than service. This is the actuarial endpoint of the MAID ratchet: the people the state couldn’t afford to treat are gone, and the savings are permanent.

Healthcare: $850-900B (declining). System serves ~42M people at a level comparable to 2000-era care with 2060-era price tags. Wait times have “improved” to 25-30 weeks, not because the system got better but because demand dropped (smaller population, higher MAID uptake, reduced expectations).

MAID: 65,000-70,000/year. 24-26% of all deaths. The Millennial generation is now entering the high-mortality years (80+). Their relationship with MAID is categorically different from the boomers’. Boomers experienced MAID as a controversial expansion of end-of-life options. Millennials experienced it as a fixture of the healthcare system their entire adult lives. Their uptake rate will be the highest of any cohort because they have the least expectation that the alternative (care) will be available.

Cumulative since 2016: 3.0-3.5M. One in twelve Canadians who have died since legalization died by MAID.

The country: Canada in 2063 is recognizable but diminished. Population declining. GDP per capita 45-50% below the US. Infrastructure visibly degraded outside of Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal cores. Resource economy operating at half capacity. Healthcare system functional for acute care and MAID, vestigial for everything else. Brain drain has removed two generations of high-earning professionals. The diaspora in the US is 3M+ and culturally distinct (they identify as “Canadian” but have no intention of returning).

The political system has not collapsed. Elections still happen. Parliament still sits. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms still exists (Section 7, right to life, has been interpreted to include the right to end life, which the Supreme Court affirmed in Carter v. Canada in 2015 and which subsequent jurisprudence has extended to every expansion of MAID eligibility).

2064-2065

Fiscal: Debt-to-GDP 65-68%. The ratio is finally approaching pre-2025 levels, forty years later. The cost of getting there: 3.5-4M people killed by their own healthcare system, a 25% decline in GDP per capita relative to peers, loss of 3M+ productive citizens to emigration, collapse of resource extraction, degradation of physical infrastructure, and the normalization of state-administered death as a routine healthcare outcome.

MAID: 60,000-65,000/year. 25-27% of all deaths. The number is declining (smaller, younger population) but the rate is still climbing. MAID is now the single most common managed death pathway in Canada. More Canadians die by MAID than die in hospitals.

Cumulative since 2016: ~3.8-4.2M.

Population: 41M (below 2025 level for the first time).

---

What This State Looks Like From the Outside

By 2065, Canada has been running MAID for 49 years. The country has killed approximately 4 million of its own citizens through a medical program that was introduced to provide end-of-life autonomy to the terminally ill. At no point was there a single decision to expand the program into what it became. Each expansion followed logically from the last. Each was defended as compassionate. Each was fiscally convenient. The cumulative effect was a system that resolved its healthcare funding crisis by reducing the population that required healthcare.

No one planned this. No one decided “we will kill 4 million people to balance the budget.” The budget balanced itself, one patient at a time, through a mechanism that was always voluntary, always legal, always framed as the patient’s choice.

From the outside, other nations regard Canada the way Canada once regarded nations with poor human rights records: with a mixture of diplomatic politeness and private horror. The word most commonly used in international policy circles is not “genocide” (too intentional) or “negligence” (too passive). The word that emerges, in UN reports and EU policy briefs and academic literature, is one that doesn’t exist yet in 2026.

It will need to describe a new thing: a state that killed a significant fraction of its population through the accumulated weight of institutional incentives, without ever intending to, without ever deciding to, and without ever stopping.

---

The Structural Lesson

The projection doesn’t require villainy. It doesn’t require conspiracy. It doesn’t require any single actor doing anything they wouldn’t describe as reasonable, compassionate, or fiscally responsible.

It requires only:

• A healthcare system that costs more than the state will fund

• A legal mechanism that resolves suffering by ending the sufferer

• A fiscal incentive that rewards the second over the first

• A framing (autonomy, dignity, choice) that makes criticism socially impermissible

• An exit option (emigration) that allows the people who would otherwise demand reform to leave instead

Each of these exists today. None of them is being addressed. The trajectory is the trajectory until something changes it, and in Scenario B, nothing does.

The system doesn’t need to be evil. It just needs to be cheaper than the alternative.

It is.