Michigan healthcare freedom community forum

Notifications
Clear all

MAHP & MHA Offer Four Health Care Refinement Ideas

2 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
6 Views
10x25mm
(@10x25mm)
Famed Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1636
Topic starter  

Dominick Pallone of the Michigan Association of Health Plans (MAHP) and Brian Peters of the Michigan Health Hospital Association (MHA) recommend four refinements to improve health care affordability in Michigan.  The reinsurance recommendation is questionable, but the other three will reduce costs for individuals, if not the State of Michigan:

https://www.crainsdetroit.com/crains-content-studio/publishing-partner/cdb-mahp-mha-ideas-healthcare-affordable/

https://shvs.org/current-considerations-for-state-reinsurance-programs/

Free ideas to make healthcare affordable
By Dominick Pallone & Brian Peters - June 22, 2026

More Michiganders are taking a gamble by going without health insurance, jeopardizing their healthcare because they cannot afford the costs. While Michigan has historically maintained an uninsured rate below the national average, increases in health insurance premiums, the loss of federal healthcare tax credits and federal changes to Michigan’s Medicaid program will likely push another 200,000 Michiganders into the ranks of the uninsured, bringing the total to well over half a million.

To compound the uninsured spike, a troubling new trend among young professionals is to bet on their youth and decline employer-offered commercial health insurance. These bets can come at extremely high costs for all involved. The patient risks high out-of-pocket costs and plans suffer due to changes in the risk pool, while providers face higher rates of uncompensated care.

High costs are impacting Michiganders of all ages. Nearly 60% of older adults in Michigan are unable to afford essential prescription drug medications. Seniors with fixed incomes are now forced to choose between adhering to their treatments and other financial demands of life. This is not the American dream.

Increasing healthcare costs are forcing customers and patients to walk away from the healthcare table, feeling frustrated, annoyed and further in debt. It must stop. It is incumbent upon us to lead with solutions, rather than allowing finger-pointing.

Earlier this year, our associations brought together our teams to develop and share state-based policy ideas to lower healthcare costs in Michigan. Insurers and providers are in this crisis together and must find ways to help Michiganders stop rolling the dice with their health. We need to think creatively and focus on issues that can generate out-of-pocket savings for patients.

One such idea is reinsurance, which can be done at no cost to taxpayers. Seventeen states offer reinsurance programs to help pool costs for higher-cost medical claims. A state can establish a reinsurance program through cost savings by transitioning from a federal to a state exchange platform, at no cost to customers. States that have developed reinsurance programs have reduced premiums by an average of 16%, according to a Princeton University study.

Later this year, it is expected that Congress will pass several changes to allow small businesses and independent contractors to join broader Association Health Plans, which offer more affordable health insurance in a larger group setting. Michigan should be the first state in the nation to codify these changes into state law and preserve the expanded scope and accessibility of Association Health Plans. AHPs offer a more affordable health insurance option for small businesses, especially those in the gig economy. This is another idea that costs taxpayers nothing.

Michigan must also stop imposing taxes and mandates on health-related goods and services if it wants to prioritize healthy living. Government mandates on insurers to provide certain benefits or coverage, and regulations on hospitals to maintain mandated staffing ratios and meet various nuanced licensing requirements increase the costs of care.

One last creative idea is called a Medicaid Buy-In policy, which would allow uninsured Michiganders within a specific income threshold to purchase government-sponsored insurance that is cheaper than anything on the marketplace and could cost state taxpayers nothing. Such a policy requires federal approval but would create an important bridge for those most likely to find themselves underwater as a result of the upcoming Medicaid changes, or for those no longer able to afford individual marketplace insurance.

Overall, we need to continue to support solutions that protect access to care and help our communities. It’s time to stop Michiganders from further risking their pocketbooks and gambling on their health. It’s time to be bold and advance real reforms that will make healthcare affordable.

 



   
ReplyQuote
10x25mm
(@10x25mm)
Famed Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1636
Topic starter  

The reinsurance experience of Georgia is not encouraging:

https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00971

Georgia’s Reinsurance Waiver Associated With Decreased Premium Affordability And Enrollment
Authors: David M. Anderson david.m.anderson@duke.edu, Ezra Golberstein, and Coleman DrakeAuthors Info & Affiliations
March 4, 2024
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00971

Abstract

Sixteen states have used Section 1332 waivers to implement reinsurance programs that aim to reduce premiums and increase enrollment in the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance Marketplaces. Although reinsurance programs have successfully reduced premiums for unsubsidized enrollees, little is known about how reinsurance affects Marketplace premiums, minimum cost of coverage, and enrollment for the large majority of Marketplace enrollees who receive premium subsidies. Using a difference-in-differences analysis of matched counties straddling Georgia’s borders to examine Georgia’s 2022 implementation of its reinsurance program, we found that reinsurance increased the minimum cost of enrolling in subsidized Marketplace coverage by approximately 30 percent and decreased enrollment by roughly a third for Marketplace enrollees with incomes of 251–400 percent of the federal poverty level. Marketplace reinsurance programs may have the unintended consequences of increasing the minimum cost of subsidized coverage and reducing enrollment. These outcomes are especially relevant in the present policy context of enhanced subsidies, which have substantially reduced the number of unsubsidized enrollees who would benefit most from reinsurance.



   
ReplyQuote
Q

Get MHF Insights

News and tips for your healthcare freedom.

We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.

 

Name(Required)
Zip Code(Required)
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Sponsors

J & DE Family Charitable Fund

Friends
of MHF

Kelly Grotendiek

Philip Harbach

Dale Johnson

Drs. Jeffrey and Joni Jones

Vickie Kahle

Tammy Kipen

Marlin & Kathy Klumpp

Melanie Kurdys

Ruth Nobel

Patrick Peterson

Stephanie Poortenga

Jeanne Smit

Ben and Hope Staal

John Tuinstra

Jacki VanHuis

Sandy Walker

Sign Up for MHF Insights to keep up on the latest in Michigan Health Policy

Name(Required)
Zip Code(Required)
This field is hidden when viewing the form

5 great non profit logos 2021 - 2025
Michigan Healthcare Freedom Candid

Click here to join the MHF Community Forum!

Grow the community on our social media pages.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial