Michigan healthcare freedom community forum

Notifications
Clear all

CBO's 2022 Medicare Part D Lies During The IRA Debate

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
7 Views
10x25mm
(@10x25mm)
Famed Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1768
Topic starter  

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is federal agency within the legislative branch of the United States government tasked with developing budget and economic information for Congress. It is not part of the Executive Branch; it only answers to Congress.

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 was a United States federal law which claimed to reduce the federal government budget deficit and lower prescription drug prices.  The CBO claimed that the IRA's prescription drug language would reduce federal spending by $ 129 billion dollars during the 10 years ending in 2031. This CBO estimate was touted by IRA sponsors, who claimed it proved that the bill would reduce government spending and inflation.  We now know these assertions were bald faced political lies.

At the end of July, the then and current Director of the CBO, Phillip L. Swagel, sent a remedial letter to three powerful House Committee Chairmen:

Jodey Arrington
Committee on the Budget

Brett Guthrie
Committee on Energy and Commerce

Jason Smith
Committee on Ways and Means

The 29 July letter, "Developments in CBO’s Projections for Medicare Part D", retracts CBO's previous lies and deftly allows that Medicare Part D expenses to the government will amount to $ 700 billion, an $ 829 billion reversal from their 2022 lies.  A copy of this letter, in full, is attached as a .pdf file.

The money shot:

In September 2022, following the enactment in August, CBO projected that enacting those provisions would lead to combined deficit reductions of $129 billion over the 2022–2031 period.4 At the time, CBO estimated that by 2026, the reductions in direct spending stemming from the first two provisions would more than offset increases associated with enacting the third.

Since then, on the basis of new information, CBO has revised its projections. Evidence now indicates that the spending reductions attributable to drug price negotiation and inflation rebates have been smaller than CBO originally estimated. The costs of the Part D redesign have been significantly larger because of greater-than-anticipated increases in spending because of greater use of prescription drugs.

As a result, the agency now projects that those provisions will combine toincrease deficits over the 2022–2031 period.

An article on this turn of events:

https://www.cagw.org/cbo-confirms-ira-drug-negotiations-raised-costs-for-taxpayers/

CBO Confirms IRA Drug Negotiations Raised Costs for Taxpayers
By Eric Maus - August 5, 2026

Price controls in any industry do not work and inevitably lead to shortages and disrupted markets. Price controls on biopharmaceuticals are especially harmful because they raise costs, stifle research and development of new cures and treatments, and threaten America’s position as the global industry leader. As the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was being considered by Congress and then signed into law on August 16, 2022, Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) cited the costs and impact of the legislation, especially the damaging and dangerous price controls on drugs.

Despite conclusive evidence of the negative impact of price controls the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) nonetheless estimated that the drug pricing “negotiation” provisions for Medicare Part D in the IRA would save the government $129 billion from 2022-2031. On July 29, 2026, CBO sent a letter with a new estimate of their cost in response to a May 26, 2026, request by House Energy and Commerce Chairman Brett Guthrie (R-Fla.), House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (R-Mo.), and House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) asking CBO to explore the budgetary effects of the IRA’s provisions that affect Medicare Part D. The letter confirmed that instead of saving $129 billion, the provisions have cost $700 billion. CBO also initially claimed that spending on drugs would be reduced from $3,200 monthly to $2,300 monthly. Instead, drugs now cost $3,500 per month.

In a press release announcing CBO’s findings, Chairman Smith said “Washington Democrats’ Inflation Expansions Act was yet another costly promise that failed to deliver lower prices for seniors. Democrats promised lower prescription drug prices, but the Congressional Budget Office is once again confirming that their policies instead increased costs for America’s seniors and taxpayers by an additional $700 billion while offering 50% fewer drug plans for them to choose from. Plain and simple, Democrats have made it harder for seniors to afford prescription drugs.”

Chairman Arrington noted that Democrats used CBO’s analysis and “sold the American people a false bill of goods.” Chairman Guthrie said that in addition to the incorrect savings estimates, the IRA has “led to increased costs for taxpayers and instability in the marketplace.”

Proponents of price controls and greater government control in healthcare claim that these policies will help patients by lowering costs, but the reality is quite different. An August 2022 University of Chicago issue brief found that price controls would increase healthcare spending by $50.8 billion over the next 20 years and result in 135 fewer drugs, negatively impacting the lives of 2.47 million patients.

The CBO mea culpa adds to the plethora of evidence that price controls on pharmaceuticals increase rather than lower costs for patients and limit access to vital medications. Lawmakers should protect American biopharmaceutical innovation and global leadership by fighting back against price controls on pharmaceuticals and every other industry.


This topic was modified 23 hours ago 2 times by 10x25mm
This topic was modified 22 hours ago by 10x25mm

   
ReplyQuote
Q

Get MHF Insights

News and tips for your healthcare freedom.

We never spam you. One-step unsubscribe.

 

Name(Required)
Zip Code(Required)
This field is hidden when viewing the form

Sponsors

J & DE Family Charitable Fund

Friends
of MHF

Kelly Grotendiek

Philip Harbach

Dale Johnson

Drs. Jeffrey and Joni Jones

Vickie Kahle

Tammy Kipen

Marlin & Kathy Klumpp

Melanie Kurdys

Ruth Nobel

Patrick Peterson

Stephanie Poortenga

Jeanne Smit

Ben and Hope Staal

John Tuinstra

Jacki VanHuis

Sandy Walker

Sign Up for MHF Insights to keep up on the latest in Michigan Health Policy

Name(Required)
Zip Code(Required)
This field is hidden when viewing the form

5 great non profit logos 2021 - 2025
Michigan Healthcare Freedom Candid

Click here to join the MHF Community Forum!

Grow the community on our social media pages.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial